b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1937678 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

They got some footage from the department store opposite the second bomb yesterday.
There was a lot of talk about them having identified him, but that's been redacted by the FBI.
(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:27, 4 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
redacted means something completely different

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:30, Reply)
Not when they issue a statement and then reissue it with less information.

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:35, Reply)
There was a lot of talk about them having identified him, but the FBI reissued their statement with less information

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:36, Reply)

There was a lot of talk about them having identified him, but the FBI reissued their statement with less information
REDACTED
(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:37, Reply)
Fewer informations.

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:37, Reply)
*A* fewer informations
IF you don't mind.
(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:39, Reply)
I was talking proportionately.

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:41, Reply)
smaller information PLURAL

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:40, Reply)
A info?

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:43, Reply)
The data on this are quite interesting.

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 12:21, Reply)
"There was a lot of talk blah blah RETRACTED"

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:44, Reply)
refuted

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:31, Reply)
reticulated

(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:32, Reply)
The FBI covered over all the talk with dirty great black lines?
Seems inefficient.
(, Thu 18 Apr 2013, 11:32, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1