
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-23544913
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 12:38, 5 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

I heard he uses the word Peroni as code for young girl
5.9.83.79/questions/offtopic/post2036263
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 12:41, Reply)

as there have been no pedo rings made up of members of other religeons.
Nor have there been and muslims who are not pedos.
Nor, while I think of it, is the bible in any way as bad as the Koran when it comes to women.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:01, Reply)

I guess I just didn't realise how thick.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:11, Reply)

Your general mirth seems to be deep set.
As you were.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:19, Reply)

Now don't get me wrong, I do hate organised religion, quite a little bit.
but I hate thickies with weak arguments even more.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:21, Reply)

Just be thankful I'm not in Politics.
I might be missing out on a column in The Daily Mail though.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:23, Reply)

it was raised repeatedly that the offenders held beliefs that non-Muslim women were fair game and that it didn't really 'count'. Their attitudes were religion-specific. Please direct me to the cases of Christian paedos who only nonced Muslims please.
Or hop back in your airship and cheer up.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:26, Reply)

I wish I were in the same intelligence bracket as Old Man Steptoe here, but alas!
I will have to skulk through life with my bigoted beliefs and general low morals.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:28, Reply)

I think *someone* here needs to check the FAQs.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:30, Reply)

Jay didn't. that said your talking about another case I was only referring to this case and actually that article, being as that's all I know about it.
Although I'd make a case that you could probably find biblical justification to do just as bad and that it's more to do with people's interpretation of their religion than the religion it's self.
in other words cunts are cunts because they are cunts, not because they believe in once sky-pixie over another.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:33, Reply)

but the point is that there are no documented cases - from the same area and in the past year - of people doing so. The opposite is true of 'Muslims' (fucking warped ones if at all but they identify themselves as such), and therefore yet another nonce ring, in that area, with all but one bearing Pakistani names...I think 'another Muslim paedo ring' is a fair call tbh.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:38, Reply)

I don't especially agree with it, or the kind of thinking it engenders, but at least it's intelligently made and has some argumental basis.
This does not counter my main point that both Jay and Hartley are think as pigshit and while I can respectfully disagree with someone with well thought our, although different, views from my own, I fucking hate the kinds of thick, knee-jerk Daily Mail reading bigot that you spend a fair amount of time pretending to be and that they actually are.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:43, Reply)

I don't know what you class as your intelligence quota, minus a few throwaway comments on the internet, but you surely can't base a persons persona on them?
Grumpy old man.
(Look, I can do it too)
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:47, Reply)

from all rape cases ever.
I think your gynaecologist pulled the wrong tooth this morning.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:39, Reply)

this is not about me being in a generally bad mood today, it's about the fact that you are genuinely unpleasant and thick to boot. Now stop trying to smooth it over.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:45, Reply)

Take some of your own advice and disappear further up your own arse.
If possible.
Ta'raaa.
Thanks for the memories.
The end.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:48, Reply)

se how saying a thing doesn't make it true.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:50, Reply)

( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:51, Reply)

I'm assuming you have inside info. I shall further assume your real name is Ricardo Hinkson,
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:05, Reply)

Read the sir names, you hand wringing lefty prick
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:06, Reply)

There's so much I don't know, but for now I agree with CQ who may or may not be Doctor Frog
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:08, Reply)

( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:10, Reply)

this is not the same as religion, you biggoted fuckwit
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:10, Reply)

The last 4 gangs have all been, so are these
You're such a fucking lefty prick
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:15, Reply)

Gulfraz and Izthkhab Banaris, Isa Iqbal and Ismail Iqbal are all methodists YOU RACIST FUCK
as are Amir Mahmood and Tasveer Hussain. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY'RE MUSLIMS YOU FUCKING BIGOT
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:16, Reply)

Sorry Monts
I don't know what I was thinking, because the last 4 or so gangs came from a culture where women are considered sub-human, and Kafirs even worse I just jumped to a conclusion.
I must think before I type
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:17, Reply)

but just because you can make an assumption doesn't mean you should
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:27, Reply)

( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:32, Reply)

you being a fuckwit, on the other hand...
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:24, Reply)

Take a back packing holiday or Be an aid worker in Somalia, if you don't like the truth put me on 2.0
PRICK
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:27, Reply)

This ain't about me being a hippy, which is more meme than reality; or a lefty, which is fairly true; it's not even about you being a biggot, which you are; it's about you being a stupid biggot.
If you don't like being called a stupid biggot then I suggest you stop being one, or you could just shut up about it, or, as you say, there's always 2.0, can't say you'll be missed.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:37, Reply)

I guess it's one of the few that slips through my dyslexia. my gutt reaction is still that it looks wrong with 2 gs, but them proper looks like it should have 2 ps to me so I'm obviously wrong.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:47, Reply)

or just a bit thick and too lazy to use spellcheck but going to claim an extra 30 mins on an exam/free computer like my ex oswald when we were at uni dyslexia?
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:50, Reply)

I use a spell check most of the time but sometimes not when I'm lazy or responding quickly.
I got extra time in exams and sometimes computers, but I'm old enough that they didn't always have spell checks in the early days and anyway those don't catch everything.
ETA: yes properly diagnosed, statmented and everything.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:55, Reply)

my ex just claimed that he sometimes wrote things backwards, so the uni bent over backwards. it was really annoying.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:57, Reply)

mine is not very pronounced these days, thanks mostly to computers, so I don't usually make a thing of it, not least because people use it as an excuse for being thick and I am in the process of calling 2 other posters thick. also usually typos from me are me being lazy and not proof reading/spell checking, but this one wasn't/
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 14:00, Reply)

oswald's in the army now. maybe his inability to read quickly enough for a 3 hour exam will mean that he gets his cock blown off.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 14:05, Reply)

I use a spell check most of the time but sometimes not when I'm lazy or responding quickly.
I got extra time in exams and sometimes computers, but I'm old enough that they didn't always have spell checks in the early days and anyway those don't catch everything.
ETA: yes properly diagnosed, statmented and everything
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 14:12, Reply)

Are you really that dense?
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:41, Reply)

no, you are.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:48, Reply)

looking at the article,if the first thing you could think to come out with was Bigot? You really need to sort it out
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:51, Reply)

and no, if you can read my main point was not that you are a bigot, that was incidental to my calling you thick.
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:57, Reply)

calling someone a prick in bold does seem like you're angry. Perhaps this wasn't the emphasis you were looking for (/starwars) but that was how I read it. I was all like WHOAH this is a different side to HH here
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:49, Reply)

your arse has got a quivering wide-on like the blackwall tunnel in a gale for this new assertive HH
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:51, Reply)

I am now counting to ten very....very slowly
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:52, Reply)

( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:15, Reply)

I might create a sock account so I can click this twice
( , Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:33, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread