b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2036306 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Fucking hell, yet another Muslim Peado Ring
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-23544913
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 12:38, 5 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
Oh Coventry

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 12:40, Reply)
it's only a matter of time before sporters goes down
I heard he uses the word Peroni as code for young girl

5.9.83.79/questions/offtopic/post2036263
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 12:41, Reply)
Bang
To
Rights
Guv
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:36, Reply)
This is what happens when a culture views women as sub beings

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 12:55, Reply)
Is there an /OT paedo ring too then?

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 12:57, Reply)
yes.

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:01, Reply)
Shouldn't someone report this to Rob then?
tee-hee
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:06, Reply)
well, obviously this is true
as there have been no pedo rings made up of members of other religeons.

Nor have there been and muslims who are not pedos.

Nor, while I think of it, is the bible in any way as bad as the Koran when it comes to women.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:01, Reply)
*throws tena lady*

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:09, Reply)
well, I knew you were thick
I guess I just didn't realise how thick.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:11, Reply)
My sweeping generalisation was a bit 'heat of the moment'
Your general mirth seems to be deep set.

As you were.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:19, Reply)
I think the phrase you are looking for is not so much "heat of the moment" as "massively and obviously wrong"
Now don't get me wrong, I do hate organised religion, quite a little bit.

but I hate thickies with weak arguments even more.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:21, Reply)
Haters gonna hate.
Just be thankful I'm not in Politics.

I might be missing out on a column in The Daily Mail though.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:23, Reply)
In that last case
it was raised repeatedly that the offenders held beliefs that non-Muslim women were fair game and that it didn't really 'count'. Their attitudes were religion-specific. Please direct me to the cases of Christian paedos who only nonced Muslims please.

Or hop back in your airship and cheer up.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:26, Reply)
I feel victimised.
I wish I were in the same intelligence bracket as Old Man Steptoe here, but alas!

I will have to skulk through life with my bigoted beliefs and general low morals.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:28, Reply)
This whole thing smacks of homophobic 'bashing', Jay.
I think *someone* here needs to check the FAQs.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:30, Reply)
In this you have a point.
Jay didn't. that said your talking about another case I was only referring to this case and actually that article, being as that's all I know about it.

Although I'd make a case that you could probably find biblical justification to do just as bad and that it's more to do with people's interpretation of their religion than the religion it's self.

in other words cunts are cunts because they are cunts, not because they believe in once sky-pixie over another.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:33, Reply)
You could indeed probably find Biblical justification to do just as bad
but the point is that there are no documented cases - from the same area and in the past year - of people doing so. The opposite is true of 'Muslims' (fucking warped ones if at all but they identify themselves as such), and therefore yet another nonce ring, in that area, with all but one bearing Pakistani names...I think 'another Muslim paedo ring' is a fair call tbh.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:38, Reply)
LEAVE IT MONTS, HE ENT WORF IT, YEH?

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:40, Reply)
you have, as I've said, a point.
I don't especially agree with it, or the kind of thinking it engenders, but at least it's intelligently made and has some argumental basis.

This does not counter my main point that both Jay and Hartley are think as pigshit and while I can respectfully disagree with someone with well thought our, although different, views from my own, I fucking hate the kinds of thick, knee-jerk Daily Mail reading bigot that you spend a fair amount of time pretending to be and that they actually are.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:43, Reply)
Your point that me and Harters are 'thick as pigshit' is as much of a generalisation as my original post.
I don't know what you class as your intelligence quota, minus a few throwaway comments on the internet, but you surely can't base a persons persona on them?

Grumpy old man.

(Look, I can do it too)
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:47, Reply)
*quotient

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:51, Reply)
Also "Harters and I" rather than "me and Harters"

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 14:02, Reply)
I apologise that my one sentence answer didn't include all the statistical facts and figures
from all rape cases ever.


I think your gynaecologist pulled the wrong tooth this morning.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:39, Reply)
Oh do fuck off
this is not about me being in a generally bad mood today, it's about the fact that you are genuinely unpleasant and thick to boot. Now stop trying to smooth it over.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:45, Reply)
But the thing is Im not.
Take some of your own advice and disappear further up your own arse.

If possible.


Ta'raaa.
Thanks for the memories.
The end.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:48, Reply)
Yes and I'm the king of Albania.
se how saying a thing doesn't make it true.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:50, Reply)
Look, you don't like me, I haven't a clue who you are... deal with these facts and move on with your day.

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:51, Reply)
*thick

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:48, Reply)
yes, yes you are.

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:50, Reply)
given that the artical doesn't even mention the men's religeon
I'm assuming you have inside info. I shall further assume your real name is Ricardo Hinkson,
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:05, Reply)
CQ are you back on the lithium?
Read the sir names, you hand wringing lefty prick
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:06, Reply)
Is Hinkson a muslim name?
There's so much I don't know, but for now I agree with CQ who may or may not be Doctor Frog
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:08, Reply)
it's as traditionally muslim as "cat stevens" in all fairness

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:09, Reply)
Yeah but Hinkson Hare was saying they were obvs muzzys cause of their surnames

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:10, Reply)
surnames may denote ethnic origin
this is not the same as religion, you biggoted fuckwit
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:10, Reply)
CQ is correct here.

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:11, Reply)
Get off your moral high horse prick
The last 4 gangs have all been, so are these

You're such a fucking lefty prick
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:15, Reply)
In for a penny, in for a farthing - that's what I say.
Gulfraz and Izthkhab Banaris, Isa Iqbal and Ismail Iqbal are all methodists YOU RACIST FUCK

as are Amir Mahmood and Tasveer Hussain. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY'RE MUSLIMS YOU FUCKING BIGOT
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:16, Reply)
haha
Sorry Monts

I don't know what I was thinking, because the last 4 or so gangs came from a culture where women are considered sub-human, and Kafirs even worse I just jumped to a conclusion.

I must think before I type
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:17, Reply)
iqbal is definitely a muslim name
not sure about the others
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:24, Reply)
Yeah 'Mahmood' might not be eh

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:27, Reply)
he's a good catholic boy

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:28, Reply)
I see what you're trying to say here Monce
but just because you can make an assumption doesn't mean you should
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:27, Reply)
we all know what they say about assumptions

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:29, Reply)
that they save time and if your assumption is based on consistent, unwavering previous incidences that actually it's fair enough to make it?

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:32, Reply)
i think that's a presumption

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:39, Reply)
Morality has fuck all to do with it.
you being a fuckwit, on the other hand...
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:24, Reply)
Go fuck a tree
Take a back packing holiday or Be an aid worker in Somalia, if you don't like the truth put me on 2.0


PRICK
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:27, Reply)
UPSET ONLINE
This ain't about me being a hippy, which is more meme than reality; or a lefty, which is fairly true; it's not even about you being a biggot, which you are; it's about you being a stupid biggot.

If you don't like being called a stupid biggot then I suggest you stop being one, or you could just shut up about it, or, as you say, there's always 2.0, can't say you'll be missed.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:37, Reply)
there's only one G in bigot, dude

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:38, Reply)
nuthin' but a g thang

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:40, Reply)
BAYBEH

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:41, Reply)
Ahh. sorry, not a word I use offen
I guess it's one of the few that slips through my dyslexia. my gutt reaction is still that it looks wrong with 2 gs, but them proper looks like it should have 2 ps to me so I'm obviously wrong.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:47, Reply)
do you have proper dyslexia
or just a bit thick and too lazy to use spellcheck but going to claim an extra 30 mins on an exam/free computer like my ex oswald when we were at uni dyslexia?
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:50, Reply)
Proper, albeit not gonz-level
I use a spell check most of the time but sometimes not when I'm lazy or responding quickly.

I got extra time in exams and sometimes computers, but I'm old enough that they didn't always have spell checks in the early days and anyway those don't catch everything.

ETA: yes properly diagnosed, statmented and everything.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:55, Reply)
then that is acceptable
my ex just claimed that he sometimes wrote things backwards, so the uni bent over backwards. it was really annoying.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:57, Reply)
Good.
mine is not very pronounced these days, thanks mostly to computers, so I don't usually make a thing of it, not least because people use it as an excuse for being thick and I am in the process of calling 2 other posters thick. also usually typos from me are me being lazy and not proof reading/spell checking, but this one wasn't/
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 14:00, Reply)
i would sign a petition to have real spellings replaced with gonzisms
oswald's in the army now. maybe his inability to read quickly enough for a 3 hour exam will mean that he gets his cock blown off.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 14:05, Reply)

not gonz-level
I use a spell check most of the time but sometimes not when I'm lazy or responding quickly.

I got extra time in exams and sometimes computers, but I'm old enough that they didn't always have spell checks in the early days and anyway those don't catch everything.

ETA: yes properly diagnosed, statmented and everything
macht frei
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 14:12, Reply)
*kerlick*

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 14:15, Reply)
gut

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:54, Reply)
Yeah I'm really angry and upset on line



Are you really that dense?
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:41, Reply)
hey, you're the one who started shouting, what am I supposed to make of it?
no, you are.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:48, Reply)
Look, Fuck off
looking at the article,if the first thing you could think to come out with was Bigot? You really need to sort it out
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:51, Reply)
still sounding tetchy and defensive here Harters....
and no, if you can read my main point was not that you are a bigot, that was incidental to my calling you thick.
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:57, Reply)
To be fair HH, although you do know your oats n'all
calling someone a prick in bold does seem like you're angry. Perhaps this wasn't the emphasis you were looking for (/starwars) but that was how I read it. I was all like WHOAH this is a different side to HH here
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:49, Reply)
christ, look at you
your arse has got a quivering wide-on like the blackwall tunnel in a gale for this new assertive HH
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:51, Reply)
Nah, I prefer tee-hee-Hare

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:53, Reply)
whatevs, goatse

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:54, Reply)
You know what Reg. you are the voice of reason
I am now counting to ten very....very slowly
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:52, Reply)
he might surprise you by entering early

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:58, Reply)
That's right - it's impossible to tell from the name 'Lunn' that you are in fact a Zoroastrian.

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:15, Reply)
Well this all escalated quickly, didn't it?

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:25, Reply)
Wilf on his high horse* again
*Penny Farthing
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:29, Reply)
*buys pizza*

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:29, Reply)
LET IT GO!

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:30, Reply)
Hahahahahahahahahhahaahha
I might create a sock account so I can click this twice
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:33, Reply)
suck account more like

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:36, Reply)
YEAH!!!!


hang on...
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:41, Reply)
YER!!!
says king of the suck socks
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:43, Reply)

s c
(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:48, Reply)
NEVER!

(, Fri 2 Aug 2013, 13:36, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1