b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2041183 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Don't be a prick, Tangles.
I am assuming you're having a troll, but in case you're not, you really need to dial down on the hyperbolic straw man.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:14, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post2041159
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:15, Reply)
lol
To answer your question, mid-Sixties. That way I'll be safe.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:18, Reply)
my family are irish
not sure when they moved over here. does ireland count?
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:19, Reply)
Definitely.
pikeys are Irish, innit.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:19, Reply)
i'm rachel not rory

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:20, Reply)
You bogtrotters are all the same to me.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:21, Reply)
We're all descended from forrins
The closest we've got to true Britons are the Welsh, Cornish and Irish.
And they all travelled up from Ethiopia at some point.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:21, Reply)
Celts came from Hungary.
The English are genetically just as Celtic as the Welsh.

It's all pointless talking about this. The problem is in itinerant squatters shooting the crime rate up, not settled immigrant communities. If this wasn't so painfully typical of the usually middle-class hemp wearers that romanticise gypsies and druids and all the rest of it I wouldn't be bothering to comment at all.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:24, Reply)
They're so mysterious and exotic, aren't they?

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:25, Reply)
My problem is that I get annoyed by stupidity even when I know perfectly well it's being put on for lols

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:27, Reply)
As with all irredeemable problems, there is stupidity on both sides. Lols or otherwise.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:29, Reply)
I just don't see why a settled community should be expected to put up with
a tiny minority of people that absolutely refuse to respect the laws of the land. It wouldn't be put up with in any other group of people, so why this lot?
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:33, Reply)
What group wouldn't it be put up with in then?

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:34, Reply)
iran has a special machine for removing the fingers of thieves

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:35, Reply)
Name me another group of immigrants that haven't largely settled down and accepted British law.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:36, Reply)
No, you said "It wouldn't be put up with in any other group of people"
so you must have an example of another group of people who "refuse to respect the laws of the land" and haven't been put up with.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:38, Reply)
Oh, I see your point.
Fair enough, I guess the last lot would have been the Nazis.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:42, Reply)
I'm not being entirely serious, I do see your point.
I think you probably do see mine, though. A specific group of people are utterly refusing to live by British law and for some reason are having a blind eye turned so long as they don't take the piss. I genuinely don't believe that would be happening if they weren't using the "oh it's our culture to wander" as a cover for an insitutionally criminal lifestyle.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:45, Reply)
Aren't the stealing and the wandering two entirely separate facets?
Or are you proposing the latter be criminalised as well?
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:48, Reply)
When the wandering coincides with trespass and squatting on land that's owned by somebody
that would be a crime, yes. Two, actually.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:52, Reply)
trespass isn't a crime
but, no-one (well, I'm not) is disputing your point.

What I am fucking strongly disputing is the argument this lot haven't been nicked because of some "cultural" or ethnicity thing. That's utter horseshit. They haven't been nicked for the same reason anyone else isn't nicked. Not enough evidence, not enough police time and not worth the bother.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:56, Reply)
I'm not saying they haven't been nicked for cultural reasons
I'm saying that they're using their culture as an excuse to move around and rob people.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:00, Reply)
No they aren't
They might or might not be robbing people.

they are using their culture as reason to move around.

these two things are not the same.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:10, Reply)
If you genuinely don't believe that
then you've read too much fucking Daily Mail and there's little hope for you.

Organised criminal begging, trespass, pickpocketing has been going on in London with limited police interference for hundreds of fucking years. This lot are not have "a blind eye" turned to them any more than any other beggars or petty theives are. You've just been listening to too much xenophobic rhetoric.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:50, Reply)
Haven't read the Daily Mail in years.
Yes, crime of all sorts has been going on for years. The fact remains that it spikes when a particular community arrives, suggesting that they operate with an institutional disregard for the law.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:53, Reply)
no.
it spikes when a group of people who happen to be criminals arrive. you want to judge a whole ethnic community by the actions of those people, you're a racist. And an idiot. "institutional disregard for the law" my arse. Are you writing speeches for UKIP now?
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:59, Reply)
Are you telling me that local crime rates don't spike when a traveller community arrives?

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:03, Reply)
I've not the faintest idea
I haven't looked into it

But I certainly wouldn't just assume it was the case without thinking. Just like I don't assume that all young black men are drug dealing murderers. But, hey, whatever keeps you feeling liberal, my man.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:05, Reply)
I'm going on my own experience.
When I was a child we'd have frequent traveller camps in my area. They weren't just one ethnic group by any means, but every time they'd turn up the incidents of assault, burglaries, robberies and car theft would spike noticeably.

Perhaps that does make me prejudiced against traveller communities. Frankly, I'm OK with that. What I'm not is racist. Traveller communities come from all different ethnic backgrounds. "Travellers" are not a race.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:12, Reply)
You do know that's the same fucking argument the EDL and BNP use about Islam, right?
fucking hell.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:14, Reply)
Oh, come on, for fuck's sake.
Now you're just being insulting.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:17, Reply)
And so are you.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:18, Reply)
no, I'm not.
The "it's not racist because Islam isn't a race so THERE" argument is bandied all the time by those fuckwits.

You're prejudiced against a particular group of society. Yes, semantically, it's not racism. Neither is sexism, or homophobia. You reckon they are "better"?
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:22, Reply)
Yes, you are.
The reason for this is that you are judging this whole group of people from Romania as criminals simply by virtue of the fact that they have come from somewhere else and are living in a way you don't like.

Nobody likes the criminal element that is almost certainly present amongst this group, but nobody likes the criminal element anywhere.

But you really can't see just how prejudicial your argument are can you?
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:17, Reply)
Well, for one thing I'm not the one assuming travellers are all from Romania, you are.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:18, Reply)
Did you miss the original post?
Because you've spent a long time arguing here for someone who doesn't know full well that we are discussing a group gypsies who are allegedly form Romania living in Hyde Park, I mean, I'm not suggesting you're clutching at straws here, but you do actually talk about Hyde Park quite specifically in the post below.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:20, Reply)
*This* group of gypsies may be from Romania.
I was talking about my experience with travellers in general. I've twice referenced it in my posts and specifically stated that I'm not targetting one group of travellers over another.

My problem with travellers, with ALL travellers, is that the crime rate spikes when they arrive somewhere and that my sympathies lie much further towards the lives that are getting disrupted. I don't think a travelling culture is a decent excuse to allow them to spike the crime rate in this way.

I am not the one making this a racial argument.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:24, Reply)
For fucks sake, this is jsut ridiculous.
www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post2041416

I'm glad you're so happy being prejudiced against groups of people because of the way they lives whilst being blissfully unaware of what sort of person that makes you.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:26, Reply)
I don't think anyone is turning a blind eye
I think you're simply making up facts to suit your argument.

I think that if the gypsies on Park Lane, or the Irish Travellers are found to have commited a crime they will be charged in exactly the same way that someone who lives on your street would be.

I also think that you are proposing that these people should be criminalised by virtue of existing and I think you should be honest about that rather than trying to hide it and saying "oh but you know what I mean don't you, it's those types that are doing it"

I think there is far more of a problem with a blind eye being turned to police officers who abuse people in custody, to people who commit large scale business fraud and to the rights of working people not to be forced into zero hours contracts and I happen to think that these issues are actually a lot more damaging to the country than the actions of a few individual petty criminals, much as I dislike anyone who would rather live a life of crime rather than actually working at a legitamate job.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:53, Reply)
If they existed without spiking local crime rates I woudln't have a problem with them at all.
Despite what you clearly seem to believe, I'm pretty liberal about how people choose to live their lives. My problem is that people shouldn't be able to trample on other peoples' rights in the doing of it.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:57, Reply)
But by your argument you are demonstrating that you aren't in fact being that liberal

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:59, Reply)
I guess I'm not being terribly liberal about people committing crimes, no.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:02, Reply)
Stop falling back on that
nobody is arguing that criminals shouldn't be prosecuted, but you are actually arguing that this cultural group are inherently criminal and you apparently can't see how racist a viewpoint that is.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:04, Reply)

www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post2041382
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:12, Reply)
what "rights" are being trampled on, here?

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:59, Reply)
Ownership of land, mostly.
Or of property.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:01, Reply)
Who "owns" Hyde Park?

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:02, Reply)
Me

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:03, Reply)
Then, I agree, Boyce's rights are being infringed

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:03, Reply)
Hyde Park Owner's Corporation.
I'll have a dig through and find their rules on camping, should I?
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:04, Reply)
please do.
I'm sure they're undergoing a huge number of sleepless nights over this and are grateful for your deep concern about their "rights"
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:06, Reply)
Well if they're not bothered about it, then there's no problem, is there?

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:09, Reply)
I suspect they are a million times less bothered about it than the Metro or the Mail
or apparently a fair number of people here.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:11, Reply)
The right of "really quite liberal" people
to get on their soapboxes about the dirty forrin criminals whilst still retaining their liberal badge.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:01, Reply)
Pakis

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:39, Reply)
Nignogs

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:39, Reply)
Paddies

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:39, Reply)
Lithuanians

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:39, Reply)
Chinkies

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:40, Reply)
& Titch

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:40, Reply)
hahahahahah

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:40, Reply)
The British.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:40, Reply)
*doubleseats*

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:41, Reply)
No one should have to put up with anyone breaking laws, regardless of where they are from or how they choose to live.
I don't think the law makes exceptions for anyone though.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:36, Reply)
Apart from Jeffrey Archer.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:37, Reply)
Well I mean, the man's a national hero.
We should make exceptions for him.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:39, Reply)
You won't hear me complaning about LORD Archer's charmed life!
His books are excellent.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:40, Reply)
I'd like to think so, but in this case I'm not certain I agree.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:37, Reply)
See above.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:39, Reply)
Fazackerly
It should be about behaviour, not ethnicity.
Fit in or fuck off seems to work in countries at least as civilised as ours.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:34, Reply)
Precisely.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:37, Reply)
'Fit in or fuck off'
I like this! I like it a lot.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:38, Reply)
bollocks it is
the problem is that people seem to think the country of origin of said itinerant squatters is somehow relevant to how they should be dealt with.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:45, Reply)
I don't think I've mentioned a country of origin at all.
I've said "gypsies", and "squatters" etc. I don't care where they're from, I care about how they behave.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:55, Reply)

www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post2041089

no problem.
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 13:01, Reply)
then where's my lovely ethiopian melanin?
why am i as pasty as a fucking onion?
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:27, Reply)
Poor breeding.

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:29, Reply)
excuse me
my parents were only half brother and sister
(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:30, Reply)
aisle three, next to the pineapples

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:38, Reply)
GO BACK TO YOUR OWN COUNTRY

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:20, Reply)
home to the home counties

(, Wed 7 Aug 2013, 12:20, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1