
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

( , Thu 27 Feb 2014, 8:47, 1 reply, 11 years ago)

( , Thu 27 Feb 2014, 8:57, Reply)

if I were marrying someone much wealthier than me, or marrying someone less wealthy than me, and the pre-nup was fair, i'd sign it. greggs hat had a beautician (don't ask, I wish I hadn't) who was apparently very hot, and some dumbass rich banker had married her for it. they were married for 6 months, no kids, split up, and she promptly went for his house and half his cash. if they'd been married 16 years and he'd cheated, maybe, but why does she think she's entitled to all that? grrrr.
( , Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:06, Reply)

( , Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:09, Reply)

but there must be massive grounds for argument over the terms of the sharing. hence his lawyers fighting hers.
but morally, she's got a lot of questions to answer, if she thinks that living with someone for 6 months entitles her to a free house.
( , Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:12, Reply)

so I don't have any sympathy for him either. but greggs hat would come back from appointments and tell me the latest in their court battle, and it made me want to punch her stupid face.
( , Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:15, Reply)

Ridiculous. The court won't go for that.
( , Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:18, Reply)

throw in a few things it's easy to concede so that you look reasonable for the bigger things.
she's another one. ask for dental insurance for micro, and pay for your own dental insurance, you over-entitled cow.
( , Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:19, Reply)

They consider all sorts of things; what assets each had prior to the marriage, joint assets acquired during the marriage, the length of the marriage (and the length of time spent cohabiting before the marriage), earning capability of each person, what the lower earning partner needs to live on etc.
( , Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:13, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread