
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

IPO = Intellectual Property Office, a UK government agency.
I've spent much of this morning trying desperately hard to log a new invention with them to obtain some form of initial protection. I've now got it but not without ringing someone in deepest Wales and threatening to do unspeakables to them. Grrr.
Here's a question for you all: if you had an invention that could seriously improve (by simplification and providing protection) the lives of people with a specific condition (in this one, diabetes), would you give it away as freeware or would you sell it to the highest bidder? My view of the world is to give it away because:
(a) very good for the soul
(b) no idea who I'd sell it to
(c) I want to, and I can
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 11:51, 10 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

But on a manufacturing-contract.
So they'd have to renew it regularly, and would net me more cash in the long run.
Morally, if I'd invented something that'd help people, I'd feel I deserved some cold hard cash out of it.
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 11:53, Reply)

Inventing things should be to make people's lives easier in my opinion - so I'd give it out as Freeware.
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 11:54, Reply)

Sell it. Ask for a percentage of profits (no idea if this is possible but ask anyway)
If it's good, people will be it. If it's sold by a big company, more people will see it, more will buy it and more will benefit, thus appealing to your fluffy side :)
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 12:06, Reply)

...the most ethical bidder. Win Win Win.
They get a good product, you get karma and cash and the sickos get the help they need.
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 12:06, Reply)

If hard up, as I am now, I'd sell it to a company that would make it safely and well, but not neccessarily to the highest bidder. You've also got more chance of getting it on the market and helping people that way as the company that's invested money in it will want to market it and get their cash back, as opposed to someone who got it for free and can't see the point in marketing it much.
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 12:07, Reply)

some company will take it and figure out some way to make it slightly better then sell it.
having a company behind you to sell it gives more advantages than initial cash
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 12:16, Reply)

don't be a fool.
Sell it. Sanofi-Aventis is a good diabetes related pharma company.
If you want ethical, go to GSK.
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 12:19, Reply)

Then donate some of your money to charity.
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 12:50, Reply)

If it's the kind of thing which will replace currently available but expensive medicine/aids then make sure that if you sell it, the people who buy it don't just want to intellectual rights to it so they can prevent people from making it.
I say protect yourself as much as possible, give it away for free but with some mechanism for people to donate money to you should they feel like it.
( , Fri 8 May 2009, 13:37, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »