b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 626507 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

how can you not see yourself contradicting yourself here?
*boggles*
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:37, 1 reply, 16 years ago)
What contradiction?
1. People get upset and the mods step in. If their upsetment is justified then mods take action. This is fine.
2. If people are getting very involved with the website they ought to really pay, if they don't I don't think it should affect the way the mods deal with any concerns they raise, but it would be nice if they chipped in.
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:39, Reply)
you are saying, again, that chipping in will justify their behaviour in some way.

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:41, Reply)
which is also what you are saying that you are not saying.

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:41, Reply)
however much you try and change the wording
or wriggle away from what you originally said.
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:42, Reply)
Hello SSG

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:43, Reply)
DID YOU THREATEN TO OVERRULE HIM

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:45, Reply)
I'LL ASK YOU AGAIN

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:49, Reply)
best bit of telly ever.

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:49, Reply)
Better than when Frank Butcher
was wearing nothing but a bow tie?
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:53, Reply)
Nothing can top the Frank Butcher spinning bow tie incident.

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:58, Reply)
that's pretty good.
i'll give you that.
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 14:01, Reply)
My head hurts

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:54, Reply)
Mine does too but it's not allowed because I haven't paid
and a headache could be construed as special treatment, oh, wait, only those who have shouldn't receive special treatment so does that mean because I haven't paid I'm special?

I'm confused. I will pay up tonight.
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 15:25, Reply)
it took me a while
and I can see why you are saying that, but that isn't quite what he is saying

the gist is, if someone is on here enough to get involved enough to be whinging, then they should contribute.

similarly, if someone were on here enough to applaud someone posting all the time.
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:43, Reply)
i just like being paxman.

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:45, Reply)
you are doing a bang up job

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:46, Reply)
i give up.
there is a fundamental contradiction in the point, and he has whittled his point down to that which is now irrelevant.
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:47, Reply)
Alright last word on the subject
there isn't a contradiction in the point.

The original point I raised is that people who moan pay money, people who over-react to moaning don't pay money. That's all I said.

I have since gone on to say that everyone should pay some money toward the site in order to keep it running.
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:49, Reply)
I am going to appear awfully rude here but I would really rather you answered a simple yes or no question,
did you threaten to overrule him?
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 14:01, Reply)
still funny

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 14:07, Reply)
I got totally sucked in there
I really should follow my own advice more often
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:47, Reply)
but did you threaten to overrule him?

(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:49, Reply)

in off
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 13:49, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1