Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 13:56, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
down to Winchester to see my mother one weekend - 'that will never happen' I was told.
The only way I'm going to get unsupervised access is by order of the court, it seems.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 13:58, Reply)
Never actually managed to sit down with the bitch to discuss it.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:01, Reply)
But why does she insist on supervised access?
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:03, Reply)
Why do you need that, if you are the father and you've never done anything wrong with your daughter or against the law (that the law knows about, of course)?
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:04, Reply)
There is no other reason, on my daughter's life, Jeff.
My family hate my ex so much they stay away - if I could have my child on my own they'd be up all the time. My ex doesn't want this - she wants revenge on me for dumping her.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:06, Reply)
It might help her move on.
(Bert?)
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:08, Reply)
FFJ are such a bunch of losers. A united legal front would probably force some law changes.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:08, Reply)
But how is it possible that she's allowed to do something like that. You love your daughter as much (or more) as her mother, you both have the right to look after her. I understand that it's best for her to live most of the time only at one house, but that you can't be with her without your ex checking on you all the time? That's unfair and stupid.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:09, Reply)
now you understand the legal system in this country as it regards to a father's rights to his children
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:11, Reply)
I am the father so I have no rights - the whole thing hangs on the whims of the mother under English law.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:11, Reply)
And nobody complains? You have no blood, British! I can't believe you don't already have a society (or something similar) and haven't taken a group of cases to court. All together will make a lot more noise than one by one.
You are the fathers. The girl wouldn't be here without you. The mother doesn't have to prove that she's good for the kids, she just gets them, and you have to fight for a few hours on your own with her. FFS! Complain! But not here, complain properly!
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:16, Reply)
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:17, Reply)
They send angry emails to each other about it, too.
b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post863503
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:18, Reply)
edit: although apparently they are useless losers
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:18, Reply)
but are as completely pointless in the real world, apart from as advice-givers.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:29, Reply)
it's like the fuel strikes and stuff, and the war protests. People do stuff, no one listens. Everyone goes home mildly disgruntled.
If it were France stuff would be on fire and rocks being hurled and the government might listen.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:19, Reply)
and we changed president for not listening to us.
You have quite a good system here, as you can talk with your MPs directly, that's why usually you don't need to complaing loudly so much. But sometimes, like this one, seems necessary to make a big mess of it.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:26, Reply)
but they won't listen
likewise with the protests here. They never amount to anything, and wouldn't even if people did try to make a big noise.
It'd ultimately end up with some knob getting violent, the police having to give him a beating, arrest everyone and they all get tarred with the same brush of being moronic rioters who definitely shouldn't be seeing their kids.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:27, Reply)
Just that I'm sorry, and I hope everything improves. I really hope that when your daughter is a bit older she realises what's going on and stop her mum.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:32, Reply)
It makes me want to cry, having to just change the subject. I feel a genuine physical pain in my chest just thinking about it.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:35, Reply)
and for your little one. It's going to be hard for her when she understands what's happening.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:44, Reply)
The people who rule this country, be they MPs or heads of corporations, are untouchable and unaccountable, so why should they listen to the plebs?
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:30, Reply)
I was talking about everyone else in the nation.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:39, Reply)
How could she possibly argue to the court that you're unworthy of unsupervised access when she's happy for you to care for her on such occasions?
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:49, Reply)
is strongly biased in favour of the mother. If she gets custody she can pretty much dictate when he sees his daughter. The courts can say "monty is entitled to x amount of contact", but it's up to him to enforce it through the courts if she simply refuses. He has to prove she's doing something wrong.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:13, Reply)
Although saying that, a mate of mine was in a similar position with his ex and he ended up going to court 4 times to try and get regular access to his son.
Each time he went it cost him over a grand and each time the court agreed that he should have every other weekend, alternate Christmas and New Years with his son and a week in the summer so he could take his lad on holiday.
She still refused him access unless it suited her. The problem was that courts won't take any action against a primary carer or lock up a childs mother for being a cunt.
As he tearfully pointed out to the woman chairing the family court pannel, every visit to court is a thousand quid he could be spending on his son.
I wish you every success with getting proper access agreed. Get some good advice and see what the professionals reckon you should be able to secure.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:11, Reply)
It's a nightmare from which I fear I shall never awake.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:12, Reply)
And it helped massively when he was in court for the second time, was to keep a diary of events.
They were both told to keep one so that any problems could be discussed.
His read, 'Telephoned to enquire as to what time I could pick up my son, was told to fuck off'
Her diary was blank because 'I forgot to fill it in' (not a single entry over 4 months).
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:16, Reply)
It can't be doing your daughter any good to have all this shit going on.
If it comes to it, I can lend you a Captain America fancy dress outfit and you can chain yourself to a bridge or something.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:24, Reply)
(cos you could SPEED AWAY so quickly innit)
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:19, Reply)
is to find a group of fathers in the same situation, and present your case all together. Not complain each time she breaks the agreement, but make sure that the law includes punishment for her when she does it.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:18, Reply)
Not if the child is living with her full time.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:19, Reply)
but you are wildly underestimating the size of the legal hill.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:25, Reply)
It makes me feel very sad, though, that the law permits this and protects the person who's doing the harm.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:27, Reply)
it's all in the best interests of the child
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:28, Reply)
The court is wrong, clearly. The best interest of the child is to have both a mother and a father.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:30, Reply)
Particularly as in my case the mother's family are bunch of fucking peasants.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:33, Reply)
but in some cases the parents won't be together, or the father won't have any interest, or will have interest but be a violent bastard. There has to be some kind of law to protect the child in those sorts of instances, but unfortunately the way it is now punishes people like Monty. Or rather, allows his ex to punish him.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:33, Reply)
But if it's the mother the one that is a bastard, then that doesn't count. She doesn't have to prove anything. She's the mother and that's all that counts.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:46, Reply)
on the whole, if the child is to live with one parent then most of the time they are better off with the mother, particularly at a very young age.
unfortunately I imagine when the law was written they didn't consider that some people might use it to exact their own petty revenge on a partner who they think has slighted them.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:48, Reply)
But the way your law works here, as I see it, is believing that the mother is good until the opposite is proved, and believing that the father could be a cunt, so just we better don't bother with him too much, just in case, eh?
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:56, Reply)
in a lot of cases it works fine, because the mother is willing to give access to the father, either with or without court action.
but in some cases, like that of our unfortunate colleague, the mother is a psycho hosebeast
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 14:58, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread