Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
i actually have a small spot for the posh army twat. how did you know??
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:26, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
because he admits that his music is shit.
and when he was first into somewhere with his tank and minions he had his guitar with him
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:27, Reply)
he is actually quite hot.
i hated him at first, that "you're beautiful" song made my ears bleed. then everything else just sort of grew on me. argh, i hate myself.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:28, Reply)
glad you reminded me, i need to appeal the one that bastard gave me in oxford last weekend!
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:38, Reply)
but that doesn't give them the right to just give you a ticket does it!
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:52, Reply)
i had to scratch off the time of arrival, which was 12:10pm. i scratched off both the 12 and the 10 in the hours column. as these fucking things are like gold-dust, i then scratched off the 10 in the minutes column rather than using a fresh one, and left. (i) it was obvious to an illiterate monkey (ie a traffic warden) what i meant; and (ii) the earliest i could therefore have parked was 10:10am. either which way, it was clear.
when i got there at 8.30am the next morning... parking ticket. the scrubby, pikey, cheating, unscrupulous, desperate, working on commission, get a real job bastards.
i'm damned if i'm paying it, i'll see them in court!
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:05, Reply)
you've just admitted it's your fault you got it wrong and therefore according to the terms and conditions which you are implicitly accepting by using the ticket, you have invalidated the ticket.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:14, Reply)
but i don't consider it to be invalid. on the face of the ticket, it was quite clear. if i had arrived after 10.10am, i could have seen their point - conceivably i could have had more than 24 hours.
if i weren't a lawyer, i'd just scratch off a new ticket and send them that with a letter saying "what's your problem?"
but my practising certificate is worth more than a £35 parking ticket, sadly.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:26, Reply)
which I'm almost certain will, according to the T&Cs, render the ticket invalid.
So really you ought to look at it as an expensive lesson in colouring between the lines.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:31, Reply)
also there is nothing in the Ts & Cs about scratching off 2 boxes invalidating a ticket. NOTHING. don't get me started on the legal ramifications of interpreting express and implied contractual clauses. but i will be really irritating the cunts at oxford city council parking department. it's the principle of the thing - that man/woman could clearly SEE i was not breaching anything. AND i was the only car on the street, so it's not as if i was even taking up spaces for residents. argh!
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:36, Reply)
You should still try not to be such a clumsy arse in future though
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:38, Reply)
would be more accurate.
yes, i intend to exploit their weakness. ha.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:41, Reply)
I was amazed - I liked him enormously.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:29, Reply)
it has since been supported elsewhere
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:30, Reply)
and he was like "second?! Come on!"
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:55, Reply)
and I can't help but imagine you covered in mud brandishing a weapon
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:28, Reply)
i'm noveau riche, darling. fur coat, no knickers. big difference!
just don't tell monty, he'll never speak to me again...
and what was that about your muddy weapon?
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 14:29, Reply)
complain about the no knickers part
as for the fur coat... can't you tell when a girl is faking it??
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:02, Reply)
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:19, Reply)
and am not going to laugh
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:20, Reply)
that owns Victoria Secret and La Senza.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:37, Reply)
"men who hate girls going commando" ?
"men with substantial interest in sales of women's pants" ?
"men who've ironically made billions from garments they have no interest in, or in what those garments cover" ?
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:43, Reply)
because of all the "les is gay" rumours. if you occasionally read the "national enquirer", you are pretty much up to speed on who might be gay.
in fact, the "les is gay" rumours add a second layer of wit to your joke that i bet my SLK you were unaware of... (because gay men don't like teh pussy)
if i hadn't just outed myself as a "national enquirer" reader, i'd have won this round.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:28, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread