Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
so I want free laser eye surgery from them. This will probably not happen though as it's unlikely I'll complain. I'm rubbish at complaining.
What are the school saying your kid has done? Is this a case of "my little angel wouldn't do that?"
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:35, 5 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
because his dad is an internet nonce.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:39, Reply)
I've been way meaner when I was trying to make you cut down on drugs.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:02, Reply)
I AM trying, you know.
Yes, 'very trying' ahahahahaha.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:04, Reply)
oh can we have an intervention on Friday? Can we can we can we?
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:08, Reply)
You were a bit of a cunt earlier. I'm sorry I annoyed you, though.
You fucking nonces are so touchy.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:08, Reply)
I didn't get a chance to even sniff a child's hair today so you can imagine I am a bit tetchy.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:09, Reply)
and what, precisely, is wrong with your eyes to make you need them
Not necessarily for suing purposes, just because you can't be too careful with your eyesight. As someone with early-onset macular degeneration, if anyone does anything to in any way inconvenience my eyesight I will absolutely fuck them up
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:39, Reply)
This happened to me and the opticians said I had got something under the lens and rubbed my eye without realising.
I've been unable to wear contact lenses for any useful length of time for about 20 years now.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:42, Reply)
and that I've possibly had an eye infection before now and not done anything about it, so they're insinuating that it's my fault anyway. They said the more I've been wearing the lenses whilst my eye is damaged the more I've been scarring them, but I wasn't to know that. It first happened a year ago and I rung them about it and they said I'd been keeping them in past their sell-by-date (albeit only a day), so that's my fault too so I don't think I have a leg to stand on. However, I'm really worried that I won't be able to wear lenses again or that my sight is going to get worse. I've got an appointment at the emergency eye hospital tonight, but I'm pretty scared
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:51, Reply)
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:56, Reply)
but I want a guide steed.
I read an article a bit ago about guide dogs and it said that Labradors were the best breed. Apparently they tried spaniels but 4 people died. I proper laughed at that, so this is my karma.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:58, Reply)
Do you suffer from astigmatism at all?
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:57, Reply)
Does that sound right? Put it this way, if I take my glasses off I can't read this screen at all until I get about 15cm away.
What's astigmatism?
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:59, Reply)
i've got it mildly as well as being ridiculously shortsighted.
If you do have it, you have to get special contact lens
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:03, Reply)
my lenses are just normal (cursed) Acuvues. Bastard Acuvue, a plague on their house.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:13, Reply)
Mine is -6.75 but I'm pretty special, I think wellgroomedwookiee has worse eyesight than me but he's one of about 5 people I've ever encountered who can say that. The good news is that if you don't have astigmatism (a condition which basically makes your eyes fucking awkward to accurately prescribe or create lenses for due to shaping and clouding) it's unlikely that any retinal scarring that's arisen from wearing crappy lenses will have overly dramatic effects.
So your eyes might hate you for a little while but lasting damage is unlikely to have occured (I find a summary is usually for the best because I'm boring)
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:05, Reply)
yes yes I have wonky eyes
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:12, Reply)
until recently one was perfect vision and the other was -1 or something so she only used to wear one lens.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:13, Reply)
I asked her if the scarring was permanent and she said yes, but that I should speak to the hospital about it and then when they've treated the pain and stuff I should go back to them and they'll refit me with daily disposables so hopefully that means my lens wearing days aren't over, but I might have to wear glasses at the bash which I'm a bit miffed about because I'm well vain.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:12, Reply)
but I'm worried my eyes will melt. Plus it's well expensive.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:23, Reply)
assuming you don't have coke-bottle mong-lenses.
I am sure you'll prove me wrong though.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:17, Reply)
You can get some really nice frames nowadays, Specsavers have a really good range. I used to hate wearing glasses, even though with the macular degeneration wearing lenses 7 days a week isn't clever (restricts oxygen flow to the eyeballs) but since I got my new pairs I really don't mind it so much. Think of them as an accessorising option
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:30, Reply)
but I received a few 'sexy librarian' related comments a while back and that made me feel a bit better about them but I need some new frames if I'm going to be wearing them more often
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:34, Reply)
She's your age, or will be tomorrow, and was initially abhorred by the idea, until she saw the range of options presented to her. She was like a kid in a candy store. Apparently it's easier to justify spending money on fashion accessories under medical instruction to do so
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:38, Reply)
IT'S A MEDICAL AFFLICTION! *sobs*
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:43, Reply)
Wearing glasses as a fashion statement is one of my greatest pet hates. I think it was Crowsephine who suggested the next logical step for those idiots would be to nick a wheelchair in order to get down the front at gigs
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:50, Reply)
I'll try and get the hospital to give me as many details as possible.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:51, Reply)
as a clear example that you are FUCKING BLIND.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:40, Reply)
I didn't mean to 'Bobby out' on you. Please excuse me.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:00, Reply)
They're the only eyes you've got, woman, and they've fucked them up! I mean, obviously get proof and a second opinion or whatever, but I would kick off in an epic style about this.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:42, Reply)
and that I should have gone to a doctor last month when I had that 3 day migraine. It takes a lot for me to seek medical assistance, so they'll probably say that was to my detriment. It's annoying though because I never had any problems before they put me on these Acuvue Hydraclear. I think that's why I've been having so many headaches of late as well. There's a personal injury and a medical negligence department at my firm though so I might hit them up for some advice.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 14:53, Reply)
In brief, he is three years old and at nursery. He is well ahead of the activities done there, and consequently gets bored and doesn't play an active role in them. For example, they play games counting to five. He knows and understands numbers into the thousands. Similarly, they play games to identify squares and other basic shapes. He is way ahead of this.
Last May his head of nursery said they felt he wasn't being challenged and could well be classified as being gifted, and asked if we would allow them to observe him for a week with a view to accelerating his learning. We agreed to this, but what ha actually happened is that on the basis of two 90 minute observations, the local SENCO (not fully qualified to degree level as is now required) suggested he had special needs.
There's a whole load going on around this as a result, but he clearly has no special needs at all. The termly reports back us, the nursery back this, but it seems that as they're independent and were struggling, they're trying to meet various minority criteria for funding etc.
My Mum is a fully qualified regional SENCO, and they've breached a huge number of regulations. They have suggested that we're negligent parents (were there the slightest chance he had a problem, we would be first to get it checked and remedied) and have broken further regulations since. They've even refused to discuss our concerns with us in person. Also, my wife is trying to volunteer as a TA to support her post-grad teaching application. The school has an overlap and since our complaint her records and application, and CRB have been "lost"
Basically, through a lack of competence, and through an inability to communicate, and through breaking regulations there is a possibility that my son will be unfairly and inaccurately stigmatised before he's at school.
There have also been other issues where he's gone to the toilet to get changed after playing in the mud, and while he has no trousers or pants on, the woman helping him has wandered off leaving him naked from the waist down, in front of all the parents then picking up their children.
There are further issues since our complaint where the nursery haven't put his waterproofs on him when they go out to play and the ground is wet, and then leave him in his wet stuff. Same with not putting his wellies on instead of his shoes (we send a change of clothes, and waterproofs every day).
So, no, nothing to do with Tommy, just the idiots responsible for him at school. We're pulling him out and sending him to a different school as a result, but I want this dealt with so it doesn't happen to other parents. We're fortunate as we know the system, and we have an experienced head and SENCO in the family.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:00, Reply)
On the upside, I know what to bring up in order to break any uncomfortable silences next Monday
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:08, Reply)
If your kid's contemporaries are still identifying shapes and counting to five at three, the whole lot of them are fucking 'special needs'. My daughter's two and is way beyond that shit already, for Christ's sake.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:11, Reply)
my little sister is six and not great with her taking away. Yet she is pretty much one of the cleverest children I've met
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:14, Reply)
but some are also THICK (not your sister, obv.). This is practically heretical to say in this day and age but fuck it: some people are just fucking dim. Not everyone has ADHD, dyslexia, fucking HSBC or whatever.
Little bastards.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:20, Reply)
and it's not just a case about me being partial- one of my sisters is very nonacademic and the family realise that and let her do her own thing.
The ADHD thing pisses me off. If your child has a genuine problem then mainstream education isn't going to help them. If they don't, then stop shovelling coke and sweets down their neck, set some rules and stop letting them make teachers lives a misery
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:22, Reply)
a lot of these syndromes are made up crap to excuse a poor home upbringing and justify naughtiness.
People don't want to take responsibility for their kids' actions.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:26, Reply)
My daughter can write her name and she is 3 and called Elizabeth. I can remember being able to read, write and count long before starting school.
Thicket kids these days, eh?
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:15, Reply)
Yeh', sounds like me in a lot of respects.
Except, you know, he's 3, and you're trying to label him for life.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:12, Reply)
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:13, Reply)
My issue is simply with their trying to label him as something that's inappropriate, in the face of conflicting evidence and then breaching a lot of procedures. Also refusing to discuss things face to face like adults. I'm not willing to have him given an inaccurate label at the age of 3 that'll follow him throughout his school life.
Clearly I'm all for trying to push him, and keep his interest.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:25, Reply)
so you can track added value throughout the year. The problem is if your sprog is advanced beyond the majority of the class the teacher may not be good enough to cater to his needs and be holding him back. eg - not giving him appropriate books or words. The new foundation system should address this issue.
(, Tue 19 Oct 2010, 15:23, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread