Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
but only in the mind of the person seeing them. They aren't a physical construct as such, merely an imagined artefact.
If anyone is telling about their 'paranormal' experiences and the story starts, "I just woke up", or "I was in my bed about to go asleep when...", or "It was the middle of the night and I woke up"....WRONG, you were asleep, whether you think you were or not. I dismiss them at that point.
The only credible story I have ever heard was from a froend who was up beside a river on a sunny Summers day. Admittedly he was having a spliff. However, he turns round and sees a very solid loking monk standing about 50ft away, full robe, the works. He turned away and looked back to see the monk still there. Turned away for a second time, now shitting himself, and looked back to see the apparition gone. He got the fear and fled.
Fast forward 10 years and he is giving a lift to some work colleagues who start talking about sppoky things and they mention 'the mad monk of duchal woods', his mind snaps back to the Summers day 10 years previous....and of course that is exactly where he was, at Duchal Woods. Legend has it, that Mons Meg, the huge cannon that now resides in Edinbro Castle, was taken down to Kilmacolm and used to destroy Duchal Castle, everyone fled except for the Monk who stayed and was killed.
www.paranormaldatabase.com/highlands/Invedata.php
When he saw the Monk, he had no knowledge of this 'legend' whatsoever, so it wasn't as if it was some sort of self fulfilling prophecy. I believed him, for what it counts.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:18, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
don't "exist" by any definition I have ever heard.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:24, Reply)
I'm not going to though so, boom headshot.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:29, Reply)
and practically nothing about any
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:33, Reply)
I firmly believe that we are creating reality, on the fly, in our own individual minds. The mind is the most complicated machine that we know of in the entire universe and is capable of some pretty amazing feats. Therefore,'seeing' a ghost is a pretty easy thing for it to achieve.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:52, Reply)
We are percieving reality from the sensations we recieve. the mind is incredibly complicated but it also takes a shit load of short cuts and is easily fooled.
I don't really get your argument, are you saying that ghosts "exist" only in the mind? In which case I would say they're no more real than any of the optical illusions you can see, like the face on mars.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:57, Reply)
the mind decodes 'a reality' from the fog of information we are constantly surrounded by. Some of this 'fog' is widely accepted as real...eg, chips and boobehs. Some of it is classed as paranormal, our mind still perceives this although in this day and age we try to dismiss it as hogwash etc etc. We all have a 'sixth sense', our instincts if you will, this is merely our mind detecting this so called paranormal information. Ghosts and visions are merely a more condensed form of these energies.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:09, Reply)
Are you saying my money is not real?
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:27, Reply)
I hate all women, hate them.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:41, Reply)
where as the improbable is exceptionally unlikely within the rules we accept our universe runs by. Therefore Holmes has it the wrong way round.
/Gentleys
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:34, Reply)
after my mum died, i had quite a lot of really distressing dreams where she was there but i couldn't speak to her, or she was there and then she disappeared, or she was horribly ill, lather rinse repeat, all part of the fun of bereavement.
then one night about two years after she died, i dreamed that she was calling me over and over and i couldn't make her hear me however loudly i shouted back. i woke up at about 5.30am, pretty disturbed, usual stuff. calmed down, went back to sleep. when i got up for work, i had a missed call on my mobile from a number i sort of recognised but wasn't in my phonebook. the call was made at about 5am.
when i rang it back, it was my mum's school.
i literally can't explain this. not one person at the school would have had my mobile number, and anyway, who would be in a primary school at 5am?
any ideas, mr sceptic??
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:25, Reply)
but the answer is odd coincidence which your subconscious twists to fit a narrative of an episode that is obviously distressing for you.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:31, Reply)
i woke up from a very vivid dream. a few hours AFTER the dream, i found the phone with the missed call. and i simply cannot think how my mobile can have received a call from that number, at that time! it's not as if i got the call, then fell asleep...
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:34, Reply)
It would be quite complicated to work out the odds of you recieving that call at that time but it'll be lower than you'd imagine. Certainly within the territory of, say, winning Euromillions, but no-one claims there is a paranormal explanation for that.
I'm sure there are many, many occasions in that period where you woke up from a vivid dream involving your mum but hadn't recieved any phone call, too.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:39, Reply)
i don't believe there is a paranormal explanation, but i'd like to hear a practical one that would make me understand it.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:48, Reply)
We (as a species) are intelligent enough to know we should search for an explanation but sometimes we aren't quite rational enough to accept that explanation when we find it, because the explanation isn't "enough" for us.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:01, Reply)
someone could have called me.
it would mean someone at the school had to be in there at 5am and to stumble across my mobile number out of the blue and call it. i mean, seriously. HOW?!
it's really not that i imagined it as dream-aftermath, although that is the natural assumption. i showed my flatmate the missed call just to prove this to myself!
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:09, Reply)
it's possible. Don't underestimate the power of coincidence.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:15, Reply)
i just don't know. unless someone got locked in the school office overnight and was slowly dialling their way through every 11 digit combination, it is a mahoosive coincidence!
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:17, Reply)
it wasn't in my phonebook, although i did recognise it. so i returned the call by pressing the "call" button on my phone. and the school answered.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:44, Reply)
It's only a massive coincidence because you aren't comfortable with it. Things of that level of statistical likelihood happen all the time and we ignore them because they don't phase us.
Someone being in a school at 5am isn't unlikely. Teachers get drunk, stay out half the night, go into their work at random times just like the rest of us. Perhaps they are pissed and drunkenly decide to phone an ex and get the number wrong. Coincidentally they dial your number. I mean, you don't think "blimey, that's immpossibly unlikely" every time you get a wrong number, yet the odds of that alone are pretty unlikely.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:34, Reply)
but it doesn't satisfy my burning need to put this to bed!
besides, my mother's colleagues were on average 50, not sexy young single teachers!
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:44, Reply)
but to talk about this specific circumstance is insensitive.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:40, Reply)
telling you to come round mine later with an 8th of premium bugle and very little in the way of clothing.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:41, Reply)
OK bring the 8th, but keep your kit on and leave by 9, alright?
After that I'm going to be 'busy', ya get me blud?
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:00, Reply)
You know you can only goad Monty for so long with this MASSIVE drug talk before he does actually arrive at your house. Like a long haired manifestation, replete with cognac, Colombian flake and an obvious hard-on
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 16:55, Reply)
speed dick is not a good look.
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:07, Reply)
This was not always the case.
Ideally:
1. Few drinks
2. sexual marathon
3. drugs and drink marathon
4. sleep marathon
5. slightly less marathonic sex
6. food marathon
7. rinse and repeat
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:12, Reply)
men and women often differ here!!
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:16, Reply)
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:19, Reply)
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:20, Reply)
given that the mind fills in so many details for us automatically, it seems very odd that it would deliberately put in anomalous constructs that do not fit with what we are expecting
(, Mon 25 Oct 2010, 17:26, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread