Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
it's just revenue making for the council. if anyone is genuinely that obstructively parked, the police can shift it.
now they are on commission, it's all about self-interest and there is no reasonableness about it - the number of times you see them loitering around cars where tickets are due to expire just so they can slap a ticket on it... no no no.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:28, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
and in any case, no, they can't just shift cars.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:38, Reply)
or not where i live anyway. so they might as well be shifting cars.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:47, Reply)
obstructive parking isn't necessarily against the law. It's still cunty.
and I don't believe you really actually think the police don't have better things to do, you're too intelligent for that.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:49, Reply)
i just really really hate traffic wardens, is all.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:56, Reply)
are not worse, as human beings, than lawyers?
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:57, Reply)
you'd be glad of lawyers, could save you getting a proper pasting. if you had a car accident, or any other kind of accident, you'd need a lawyer. if your employer shafted you, if you wanted to go self-employed and had tax issues, if you wanted to make a will to ensure everything went to the right place, if someone squatted in your home when you were on holiday, if someone accused you of a crime you hadn't committed (or that you had), if someone said defamatory things about you, if you wanted to go into partnership with someone, if you wanted to get divorced... you'd be glad of lawyers.
traffic wardens... you'd only be glad if you needed to find someone less popular than yourself or needed a halloween costume.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:01, Reply)
if i slagged off chefs, you'd probably leap in there and say-
well actually, probably "i don't give a fuck, shut up woman."
so what's for dinner then?
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:07, Reply)
but also generally that i don't give a fuck.
i made a leek and potato soup, early dinner, feeling a bit ill like.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:10, Reply)
see, we agreed on something. it wasn't that hard, was it?
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:11, Reply)
but it does mean that you can't call me a moron without also calling yourself a moron
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:14, Reply)
because you feel you should be able to park wherever you like.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:41, Reply)
since traffic wardens, here at least, keep people off cycle lanes and from blocking disabled entrances. you can't just park anywhere, and there is usually a reason for that.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:54, Reply)
cycle lanes are even worse. they are built for cyclists, scumsuckers of the worst sort. block them all, i say, preferably with the cyclists trapped inside them with no food or water or toilets. then hopefully they might all eat each other and give the rest of us some peace from their wingmirror bashing, red light sailing, pedestrian endangering, driver endangering, traffic slowing ways!
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:58, Reply)
but cars, well.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:01, Reply)
i saw one twat nearly nail a baby in a pushchair the other night because apparently red lights don't apply to cyclists and they can zoom straight over pedestrian crossings without looking. the mother was in tears of shock and the cyclist had the nerve to yell at her!
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:03, Reply)
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:03, Reply)
but cyclists make me have to watch my back as a pedestrian and to drive more slowly as a driver.
outside london they don't bother me at all. inside london the city is full of tools with no idea how to adhere to the highway code giving the good cyclists a bad name.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:09, Reply)
the cyclists and the traffic wardens, they really are
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 18:14, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread