Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Holy shit. I think your bottom line (cough) must still be pretty impressive.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:10, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
Albeit I'd also have to sacrifice a lot more free time, pay more in rent, and likely have to cut my hair and shed piercings :/
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:22, Reply)
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:27, Reply)
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:24, Reply)
Stratford's not far off London prices though, so that wouldn't be a huge step up for me.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:25, Reply)
*sad faces*
bought all my family's presents and sent them off and my wallet is in paaaaaaaaaaaain.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 16:12, Reply)
If you're happy enough now then why worry.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:24, Reply)
that includes the weighting. Science sucks balls, it really does.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:24, Reply)
Oh well, I doubt I'd want -or be able- to do your job anyway.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:28, Reply)
My salary goes up by £2300 in London. Fucking matched salary scales. Mind you, I can't complain, I'm not at all badly paid except when I remember the salary I left in industry :( :(
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:29, Reply)
a lot of the jobs at Imperial/UCL are fairly well paid even before the weighting. Around £20k is average for a technician now, but I'm a ways off that sadly.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:33, Reply)
I thought all the academic scales were matched? I got the same salary when I moved from UCL to here because they couldn't pay a lecturer any more and they wouldn't give me SL straightaway. Bah.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:38, Reply)
Certain areas it's 17-21, but in places like Cambridge and London it's 20-24. Either way, it's always between 17-24.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:42, Reply)
I'll hardly say "lucky you" given how shite support salaries in academia are.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:43, Reply)
If I'd gone in to the graduate scheme at McDonalds, by now I'd probably be earning twice as much. Sad, isn't it?
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:46, Reply)
Did you see the fucking GQ "rock stars of science" thing? how can a society be so fucked up? Why do we want our scientists to be compared favorably to rock stars? for fucks sake, in any civilised society it should be the other way round.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 16:06, Reply)
"Hurr, tits!"-grade australopithecines.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 16:16, Reply)
sometimes i love my job, love my clients, love my colleagues, think i am lucky to earn such a silly amount of money for such a great job.
then i have whole weeks of working 7am-2am, sweating over court deadlines and expert reports and witness evidence whilst juggling it with the more standard 8am-8pm bread and butter work and billing and business development and senior solicitor duties... during those weeks, they could pay me three times what they do, it would still not be a third enough!
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:33, Reply)
I don't think anyone here seriously believes you don't deserve your pay, you work ridiculous hours for it.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:36, Reply)
That's not a complaint, mind, personal choice innit. fair play.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:41, Reply)
that's why so many people apply to be lawyers every single year, of course they aren't doing it for love of the law!
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:47, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread