![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Why not have a question about the EU referendum? asks Spanishfly. Rather than something you have done or experienced. Let's hear how you think leaving the EU will affect you.
( , Mon 27 Jun 2016, 13:44)
« Go Back
![This is a QotW answer](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'll play devil's advocate just to keep things antagonistic
( , Wed 6 Jul 2016, 7:27, 25 replies)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The Working Time Directive.
Probably the ECJ, too, although I'm sure you can tell me how corrupt it is.
Pissing off Eurosceptic Tories.
I'll probably miss that last one, more than anything, but I expect the EU will have plenty to annoy then with whilst we negotiate our Brexit.
( , Wed 6 Jul 2016, 11:26, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Wed 6 Jul 2016, 11:32, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Working Time Directive is easily bypassed by using zero-hours or junk contracts, or forcing people to set up their own companies to invoice them directly, or any other PAYE bullshit
ECJ is fair enough
( , Wed 6 Jul 2016, 11:45, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
rather than the rubbish box of six in the corner shop
( , Wed 6 Jul 2016, 14:07, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
ESPRC funds more PhDs and its pan-euro nature makes it easier for research and collaboration.
Also as a chemist REACH helps control and reduce hazardous chemical use. Useful if you work with stuff that can do a full on raiders of the lost ark on your face, like I do.
( , Wed 6 Jul 2016, 19:10, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
the fact that the UK pays in more to the EU than it gets back means it's a moot point. Of course, leaving the EU means expecting funding from the Tories rather than Brussels, but that just means you have to vote responsibly in the next election.
The REACH issue means that you think eurocrats overseas care more about the health and safety of UK workers than the UK agencies responsible do, which is almost ludicrous considering how the UK leads Europe in "injured at work?" court cases.
( , Wed 6 Jul 2016, 19:56, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
If you do want it to be about money though, it was one of the areas where the UK did do disproportionately well.
Regarding health and safety, how does the UK leading on court cases prove your point? Maybe it just points towards a problem with litigious culture or our workforce being made up of clumsy idiots.
( , Thu 7 Jul 2016, 13:41, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
to implement extremely stringent quality controls and workplace safety, because UK's litigation culture makes them much more susceptible to massive payouts for worker injuries compared to other places in the EU.
I don't know enough about your field to discuss international co-operation, but knowing that tools like Thompson Reuters' Web of Knowledge exist means that there other incentives for international collaboration outside the established EU frameworks.
( , Thu 7 Jul 2016, 14:23, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Thu 7 Jul 2016, 18:02, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
...there's the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health.
( , Thu 7 Jul 2016, 13:37, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I just got a condescending letter from Lord Tebbit in reply to my email about science funding.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2016, 16:35, closed)
« Go Back