Being the best at something
isn't a particularly good survival trait. Being average is far better. You only need to procreate once for your genes to carry on, so keep your head down and don't draw attention to yourself and chances are you'll manage at least one fuck trophy.
( CowJam, Sat 23 May 2009, 18:52, archived)

being the sexiest is presumably a survuval trait then
at which I fail.
( Rotating Wobbly Hat That's not a banana. THIS is a banana., Sat 23 May 2009, 18:55, archived)

Sexiness is defined by what the human species requires to survive
I assume we only find large(ish) knockers hot because it means they'll probably be be able to provide more milk for a child (would some like to prove this for me with science?)
( SuperMatt, Sat 23 May 2009, 18:57, archived)

I am researching this
with visual reference material from Nuts.
( Rotating Wobbly Hat That's not a banana. THIS is a banana., Sat 23 May 2009, 18:58, archived)

Not necessarily true.
Sometimes sexiness can be defined by what's available on a Saturday night through an alcoholic haze just before the club closes and you face the prospect of having to go home on your own again but would really like to get laid.
( Lord Gnome, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:00, archived)

oh christ no
don't remind me.

This is why I can no longer set foot in the district of Denton, Manchester.
( Rotating Wobbly Hat That's not a banana. THIS is a banana., Sat 23 May 2009, 19:05, archived)

It's a fairly universal anecdote.
But at least it has always helped me pull drunk women.
( Lord Gnome, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:06, archived)

Nope.
They're most likely purely decorative. Selected by sexual preference. Cave men were boob men. Other apes don't have knockers and they need to produce the same relative amount of milk.

Mmmmm norks.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:00, archived)

They don't?
filmdrunk.com/ul/347-MonkeytitsW.jpg
( Lord Gnome, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:03, archived)

Ah yes, but the norks of all mamillia swell when rearing their young.
I would have thought that larger norks would give a hint to the amount of swelling that would occur. I'm just speculating, but if I can use science to justify staring at norks, then so be it!
( SuperMatt, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:03, archived)

Or maybe we see large norks as being "already swollen" so it becomes attractive because it's proof of fertility

( SuperMatt, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:05, archived)

I thought you preferred budding norks.

( Lord Gnome, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:05, archived)

They swell because they've got milk in.
Little boobs swell too.
( LimeyTreat Bitch. Lover. Child. Mother. Sinner. Saint., Sat 23 May 2009, 19:11, archived)

Like I mentioned above
it may be the idea of already being swollen that attracts males. I could be wrong, but hey, it's a theory.
( SuperMatt, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:13, archived)

So that's why men like big swollen bellies on women
it's clear.
( Flapjack I spay a little mare for you, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:16, archived)

That's not what I said!

( SuperMatt, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:17, archived)

Some men do
It's a fairly well-known fetish to prefer pregnant women, just as it is to prefer lactating women.
( Lord Gnome, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:22, archived)

No, it isn't.

( CowJam, Sat 23 May 2009, 19:09, archived)