b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 626408

Re.:
www.b3ta.com/talk/626270
Can I just say...
...it was obviously The World-Wide Zionist Freemasonic Communist Alien League, in cahoots with the Thule Society, the Knights of Malta and the Trilateral Commission, planting bombs in order to bring about nuclear war on the entire Muslim world as forseen by Nostradamus? And that if you take the books of the Old Testament in original Hebrew, transcribe it in Wingdings and then take every 113th character you get the lyrics to Heartbreak Hotel, thus PROVING that George 'Satan' W. 'Satan' Bush knew all about 9/11? Because 9*11 = 99 and an ice-cream with a Cadbury's 99 was Saddam Hussein's favourite treat?

Sorry for wibbling, conspiracy dickheads really wind me up. Carry on...
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:49, archived)
You're forgetting
the Illuminati secretly funding the Symbionese Liberation Army to provoke a neo-con backlash.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:51, archived)
And what about the Bilderberg group?
Hmm? Forgotten about them haven't you.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:52, archived)
Shit, I had forgotten them
and they're coming for tea tonight!
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:53, archived)
You'll never fill all those vols au vent in time!

(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:01, archived)
*drops trousers*
Not on my watch!
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:06, archived)
Well that goes without saying.

(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:52, archived)
It's a conspiracy to make us all
think conspiracy theorists are dick heads!

*dons Kit Kat wrapper in place of tinfoil hat what I lefted at home*
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:52, archived)
This has actually occurred to me - a meta-conspiracy theory,
namely that the vast majority of idiotic conspiracy websites and books have been created secretly by the CIA to, as you say, make us think all conspiracy theorists are dickheads.
Still, the X-Files was quite entertaining for the first few series, so it's not all bad.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:56, archived)
I don't know if these conspiracy theories are true or not.
I do know, that my life won't change significantly as a result of nut jobs banging on about it.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:58, archived)
I was in love with Agent Reyes.

(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:03, archived)
I've been rewatching the X-files
and quite frankly I want to do Scully until she's broken in two.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:05, archived)
Not in the big-haired first few series though?
She was far sexier later on avec baby.

Anderson, you am teh craaaazy. :)
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:08, archived)
Their are some terrible hair and wardrobe faux pas
commited in the earlier series it's true.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:12, archived)
Dunno. She's sort of hot-and-boring at the same time.
Definitely do-able, what with that red hais and nice legs and cute nose, but she had the most boring character ever. In one episode her dad dies and when Mulder addressed her as 'Dana' she looked at him as if she was about to file a complaint of sexual harrassment.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:13, archived)
She only has that one look.
Pouting lips and one eye half closed. As if she's about to have a seizure.

But still. Pretty as hell. :)
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:16, archived)
My eyes/balls must be borked
I find her about as sexually appealling as a sherry trifle.

Mmmmmmm ... sherry trifle.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:09, archived)
You're officially a gayer:
www.100megsfree.com/spooky42/scully/Pic01.jpg
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:19, archived)
Most gay men love Gillian Anderson.
It's a bit like the "Kylie effect".
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:23, archived)
But you sounded as if you'd like to put your winkie inside her, too?
And I know you used to like girls before you saw the light. :)
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:27, archived)
I would probably put my winkie in her if forced.
I'm an open minded queer.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:30, archived)
"I'd shag Gillian Anderson if I was forced to."
Such modesty!
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:33, archived)
I wouldn't do it if she was an average woman.
But the celebrity status makes it a bit more exciting. And she might let me watch hardcore gay porn while I bang her.

I'd probably give her a snog for free though.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:37, archived)
*inflaccidates*

(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:26, archived)
But
Kit-kat wrappers are now made of plastic, not brain-ray-blocking aluminium.

Clearly this was done by the Lizards to foil plans such as yours.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:02, archived)
You are Dan Brown
AICMPoSM
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:52, archived)
What,
stealing everybody elses ideas and getting rich off it?
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:56, archived)
Somebody should write a conspiracy thriller based on
an author reading a few books and stealing characters, plot devices and research.

The original authors could then murder him and frame an ancient order of Franciscan Monks.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:02, archived)
Daddy or chips ?
that's the real question.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:56, archived)
Kempston or Quickshot?

(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:00, archived)
Quickshot!
Oh, right, you're taking the piss, aren't you?
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:01, archived)
I was but good answer anyway.

(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:05, archived)
This latest conspiracy theory doesn't even make sense as a conspiracy theory.
Who is supposed to be conspiring with whom to do what and why? It would make the worst X Files episode ever.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 12:59, archived)
More to the point, I fail to see how the Israeli Embassy getting a bomb threat is meant to be significant.
They probably get bomb threats every day - just consider how many disaffected young Muslim lads there must be in London alone. And the Met/CID must have the duty to follow up every threat they get seriously.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:02, archived)
Charles Clarke wants ID cards brought in
Tony wants to justify the War on Terror, the military-industrial complex has a vested interest, and Mister Al-Khazani in Finchley has a job lot of explosives to shift.

*eye twitch*
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:13, archived)
That's me persuaded.
Where do I subscribe to the newsletter/sign-up to the militia/send my personal cheque for ten thousand pounds?
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:17, archived)

Charles Clarke just appeared on TV and said that ID cards would not have prevented an attack like this.

It could well have been carried out by British terrorists, ie. who would have had perfectly legal ID cards.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:18, archived)
Charles Clarke on Today (Radio4) this morning:
"Yes, I want ID cards, but they wouldn't have helped to stop what happened yesterday." [paraphrased]
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:18, archived)
The problem with all these conspiracy theories
Especially those involving governments - is that governments change round so often, that it would be impossible to keep such a conspiracy running.

The only interesting thing in that regard, is that yesterday's bombing had 4 bombs, as did Madrid and New York. And no, I don't think this is a clue that it is some weird conspiracy, just an interesting factoid.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:16, archived)
I thought there were 5?
Edit: 3 tube bombs and a bus, according to BBC. Right you are.
(, Fri 8 Jul 2005, 13:23, archived)