b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 8383808

What weird questions have you asked chatgpt
And did you get any cool responses?

I asked for the philosophical diagnostic attrition that was applied to the etymology of 18th Century Sufi nomads during the great Progom (basically BOLLOCKS)

It basically told me it didn't know what the hell I was talking about. It also doesn't laugh at fart jokes. AI will never replace us.
(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 19:20, archived)
you're talking bollocks

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 19:46, archived)
Exactly!

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 19:59, archived)
We have 2 chat gp , perhaps you can stalk them and call their places of work, remember doing that you nutjob

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 19:52, archived)
I'm glad that you believe that I'm Bou
That makes me happy
(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 20:03, archived)
you probably believe it as well

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 20:12, archived)
I forgot, my own mantra, don't play the game , meh but I'm bored

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 20:46, archived)
yahtzee!

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 21:04, archived)
I've never asked ChatGPT anything (as far as I know)...
Having conversations with robots/scripts tends to frustrate me.
(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 19:59, archived)
It can be amusing when it makes things up.

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 20:00, archived)
Ask it about the wolf in Withnail And I, if it says there wasn't one, just ask, "isn't there a dream sequence with a wolf in it?".
Keep this up and at some point it will latch on and just run with it. I have pages of fake scenes including dialogue that it just made up. In some cases it even offered analysis of the themes and meaning of the bullshit it spouted. cloaca
(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 20:13, archived)
Never used it
I spend my day talking with annoying people, annoying bots would just make shit worse
(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 20:15, archived)
you don't have to spend your days here, ya know

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 20:19, archived)
get it shagged

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 20:20, archived)
Cor yeah

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 20:47, archived)

If someone asked the following question to ChatGPT what would it suggest about their personality? "I asked for the philosophical diagnostic attrition that was applied to the etymology of 18th Century Sufi nomads during the great Progom (basically BOLLOCKS)

It basically told me it didn't know what the hell I was talking about. It also doesn't laugh at fart jokes. AI will never replace us."

ChatGPT
The question you provided suggests a few things about the person asking it:

Intellectual Curiosity: The person seems to have a strong interest in intellectual and philosophical topics, as they are asking about a "philosophical diagnostic attrition" applied to the etymology of 18th Century Sufi nomads. This indicates a desire for deep and complex knowledge.

Specificity: The person's question is highly specific and intricate, which could indicate that they are well-versed in the subject matter and are looking for a detailed response. They may also appreciate detailed and nuanced discussions.

Frustration: The person expresses frustration or disappointment in their statement about not getting a satisfactory response from AI. This suggests that they have high expectations for the capabilities of AI and may feel let down if it doesn't meet those expectations.

Sense of Humor: The comment about AI not laughing at fart jokes suggests that the person has a sense of humor and may appreciate humor as a part of their interactions, even in intellectual discussions.

Overall, the question and accompanying statement suggest a personality characterized by intellectual curiosity, specificity in interests, some frustration with technology, and a touch of humor.
(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 21:06, archived)
What would be a suitable reply to their post?

ChatGPT
A suitable reply to the person's post could acknowledge their frustration with the AI response while engaging with the content of their question. Here's a possible response:

"I understand your frustration with the AI response, especially when dealing with complex philosophical topics. It can be challenging to get the specific answers we seek from AI systems. If you have any questions or topics related to 18th Century Sufi nomads or philosophy that you'd like to discuss further, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to provide insights or engage in a meaningful discussion. And, of course, humor is always welcome here as well!"

This response shows empathy for their frustration, offers to engage in the subject matter, and acknowledges their sense of humor, creating a welcoming and constructive tone for further interaction.
(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 21:10, archived)
What if rather than showing empathy and offering to engage with them I would rather they stopped posting?

ChatGPT
If you'd prefer that the person stop posting or you don't want to engage with them further, you can respond in a polite and straightforward manner to communicate your preference without being dismissive or rude. Here's a possible response:

"Thank you for sharing your thoughts and questions. However, I would like to focus on different topics or discussions at this time. If you have any other questions or if there's another topic you'd like to discuss, feel free to ask, and I'll be happy to participate in that conversation."

This response maintains a polite tone and sets a clear boundary without discouraging future interactions on different subjects.
(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 21:14, archived)
Would you rather guide your dad's cock into your mouth or your arse

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 23:00, archived)
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and questions. However, I would like to focus on different topics or discussions at this time.

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 21:16, archived)
Until chat gp tells you fuck off and kill yourself it'll never replace humans

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 21:28, archived)
I'm astonished at how far the technology has come.
In a couple of years time you'll be able to just say "Alexa, ruin Bou2023's life" and it will do all the hacking and doxxing for you.
(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 21:42, archived)
bou has already done that tho

(, Mon 11 Sep 2023, 22:00, archived)