toast ...
From the Infographics and Flowcharts challenge. See all 196 entries (closed)
( , Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:16, archived)
From the Infographics and Flowcharts challenge. See all 196 entries (closed)
( , Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:16, archived)
It's like we've gone back in time to the 1960s
and are now watching "The Comedians" standup comedy show.
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:18,
archived)
and which country do the "queers" go back to?
also, why "toast...."?
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:22,
archived)
also, why "toast...."?
I didn't realise
That Sambos, Nig-Nogs and Wogs were separate groups.
I've not seen any details on this, is it just a plane ticket, or do we get some cash to help with moving costs?
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:30,
archived)
I've not seen any details on this, is it just a plane ticket, or do we get some cash to help with moving costs?
and has any research been done in to whether the cost of repatriation is actually less
than the benefits they could claim if they were here simply for nefarious deeds?
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:31,
archived)
I still say, repatriate all immigrants and descendants of immigrants
In chronological order. Celts, Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Vikings and Normans first.
Pictland for the Picts!
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:34,
archived)
Pictland for the Picts!
**Packs bag**
Being Norfolk stock, I think I descended from Vikings :(
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:42,
archived)
**Sets sail for Vikingland**
**Awaits BNP repatriation payment**
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 21:05,
archived)
Or the taxes they pay on their earnings doing all the shitty work we won't
Half of which goes back to their families in the third world hellholes they escaped from.
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:35,
archived)
shhhhh, don't interfere with their racism, they'll get all grumpy and not sleep well
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:37,
archived)
Cool, I could jack in the job and shack up
at the father in law's third world hellhole mansion in Barbados
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 21:09,
archived)
has this got some sort of non-racist subtext that i'm missing?
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 20:41,
archived)
sub subtext
I guess I was going for some sort of shatirical comment on the BNP manifesto release and Unilever legal action happening on the same day
fah!
mebbe I misjudged the tone of the main board. I often miss cues. eg on first sight I thought the 'I agree with Nick' twitter chorus was an ironic cheering on of the BNP ...
( ,
Fri 23 Apr 2010, 22:10,
archived)
fah!
mebbe I misjudged the tone of the main board. I often miss cues. eg on first sight I thought the 'I agree with Nick' twitter chorus was an ironic cheering on of the BNP ...