While I'm against the ruling in principle, it's not all bad news...
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:26, archived)
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:26, archived)
hahahaha
this is excellent news as it means insurance policies for men will come right down.
won't it?
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:27,
archived)
won't it?
it's nice that in this pan-european austerity period
that they have decided to pass a law that forces insurance companies to charge people more.
i bet the belgian man that bought this case forward is really popular.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:36,
archived)
i bet the belgian man that bought this case forward is really popular.
his chocolates
and dodgy pron collection
/stereotypes in an attempt to ironically lampoon the insurance industry
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:46,
archived)
/stereotypes in an attempt to ironically lampoon the insurance industry
^ This needs to be a euphamism
I shall write to my MP to make it so.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:26,
archived)
I whole heartedly support the stereotype. I had a Belgian housemate who left the country quickly after being fired for gross misconduct and left behind a large bin bag in his room filled with pron and chocolate cake.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:49,
archived)
as soon as you posted that on FB, I thought I'd better get my skates on!
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:52,
archived)
I'll be collecting my cat from the vet's later
he'll be slightly lighter and somewhat annoyed
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:21,
archived)
he has to some down eventually
and he'll be wanting answers!
Also - Mrs S likes her new earrings - she'd better keep them covered up
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:31,
archived)
Also - Mrs S likes her new earrings - she'd better keep them covered up
if he's had enough drugs
he may just wake up and think he's lost them under a bush
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:33,
archived)
my missus is with them.
They are the shittest company ive ever had the misfortune to deal with.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:31,
archived)
lol
I hate those adverts. If it were reversed the wimmins lib facists would be up in arms saying that it was sexist and discriminated woman.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:36,
archived)
Big Daves Men Only Car Insurance
Ladies - Fuck off, we won't insure you.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:37,
archived)
Classic example
An advert that excludes women. It was discontinued on grounds of sexual discrimination. Whereas men a continually portrayed as simple, uncouth, inintelligent, inferior to women (who are smart as they use BrandX) beings in about 99% of all televised adverts..
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:48,
archived)
man
that's bad news. Threaten to leave her. In the middle of the street
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:22,
archived)
clever people cat stutter you know:P
Second time lucky for you though. I haven't forgotten last time.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:42,
archived)
Well, that's a double bonus for you, matey.
I don't know of any cats that stutter.
*kapow!*
Edit: isn't "smartarse" hyphenated? ;-)
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:46,
archived)
*kapow!*
Edit: isn't "smartarse" hyphenated? ;-)
if you look at any statistics that are split across 2 groups
then one will always be higher than the other, i,e accidents per miles driven
men v women
white people v non-white people
people over 5 foot 7 vs shorter
people with a middle name v people with no middle name
one religion vs all other religions
but nobody would dream of discriminating across any of these categories
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:57,
archived)
men v women
white people v non-white people
people over 5 foot 7 vs shorter
people with a middle name v people with no middle name
one religion vs all other religions
but nobody would dream of discriminating across any of these categories
I'd like to discriminate against people who don't have a middle name
and also people who have more than one middle name.
Ronnie Corbett was in a sitcom about a world in which short people were discriminated against, but that's all I can remember about it.
edit/ as far as I can find out, the sitcom was "Small Problem" and didn't star Ronnie Corbett, it was Mike out of the Young Ones.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:03,
archived)
Ronnie Corbett was in a sitcom about a world in which short people were discriminated against, but that's all I can remember about it.
edit/ as far as I can find out, the sitcom was "Small Problem" and didn't star Ronnie Corbett, it was Mike out of the Young Ones.
margaret :(
thank you grandma, for having the poor taste to die 2 months before i was born.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:14,
archived)
i'm the ONLY ONE in the family with a middle name
those fuckers don't know how lightly they got off.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:24,
archived)
Yes they would!
If statistics said people under 5' 7" claimed more money; they'd charge them extra. They do this for a living you know! Health insurance does it all the time. Family history, lifestyle, BMI, smokers...
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:04,
archived)
Presumably now they can't charge women less
for a decreased risk of contracting testicular cancer
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:08,
archived)
I'm not defending anything
I'm just pointing out the facts. And as far as I know, nobody gets charged for cancer. It's free.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:13,
archived)
I for one stand up for those of us in society
who are 1.82m tall, have a middle name that starts with a vowel, owns a shed and doesn't particularly like Hawaiian pizzas but will eat one if put in front of me!
FOR WE ARE STRONG!
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:09,
archived)
FOR WE ARE STRONG!
It is sexist and it's as irritating to women as it's is to men.
They also are a rip-off, they charge more than other insurance companies not less as they claim.
The EU bullshit won't make it cheaper insurance for anybody but that's more down to the way Insurance Companies work rather than anything else especially as they try to predict what kind of driver you are based on some statistics they claim to be accurate but it's the worse kind of generalisation.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:27,
archived)
The EU bullshit won't make it cheaper insurance for anybody but that's more down to the way Insurance Companies work rather than anything else especially as they try to predict what kind of driver you are based on some statistics they claim to be accurate but it's the worse kind of generalisation.
I think it is insanely wonderful
Insurance companies can no longer assess risk using known facts. I so hope they start being bizzarre in retaliation. Question 1: Regardless of gender, age or postcode: Are you fluffeh?
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:36,
archived)
It depends on which "facts" you choose to divide people
Why gender? Why not race, or religion?
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:40,
archived)
Muslim women should pay higher premiums because they can't see out their yashmaks.
Scientific fact.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:42,
archived)
Statistics prove they have a greater risk of driving their cars into a lake or river.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:32,
archived)
You are not privvy to OUR data files!
The way we weight our points system is beyond your Science and Understanding mere Mortal - DO NOT QUESTION OUR WAYS!
But we can assure you it's entirely fair and demographically, geographically and ottergraphically correct... in the loosest sense of the word correct.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:49,
archived)
But we can assure you it's entirely fair and demographically, geographically and ottergraphically correct... in the loosest sense of the word correct.
Gender, age and postcode
are the main definers as to who makes a claim and for how much. If race or religion made a difference, you can be darned sure the insurance companies would take it into account.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:46,
archived)
Why gender?
Why am I lumped in with a category of everyone else who happens to have similar genitals to me?
The only reason they don't take race or religion into account is because it's illegal thanks to anti-discrimination laws. Otherwise you know they would.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:22,
archived)
The only reason they don't take race or religion into account is because it's illegal thanks to anti-discrimination laws. Otherwise you know they would.
It isn't my fault.
We are all lumped into catergories; it is how the world works. Our current government got about 30% of the vote, if that. So 70% were sold short. I don't like it any more than you do, but show me an alternative that works? Should insurance companies interview each applicant? How much extra would that cost?
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:30,
archived)
Well the ECJ has shown the way
By ruling that gender-based discrimination is not allowed, which I think is a step in the right direction.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:45,
archived)
Sounds fair enough to me
If it's your first time being insured you get charged a flat rate that goes up or down depending on your experience, claims and no claims. Why your gender, age, colour, creed etc should be a factor is beyond me.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 16:04,
archived)
Well.
If you are male you are more likely to make a claim. If you are under 25 you are more likely to make a claim. What business wouldn't take that into account? They would be stupid. Would you sell private health care to a rugby playing boxer with a 40 a day habit for the same price as a monk? You'd be mad!
edit: and skint in a week.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 16:53,
archived)
edit: and skint in a week.
Statistically they woman may be safer driver than men
To say that someone has to pay more because he is a man is discriminatory. The statistic conciders the whole not the individial therefore is inaccurate when applied just to one person.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:45,
archived)
But insurance is a form of gambling
So statistics is all they have to work with.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:48,
archived)
Not so
They also take in the history of the individual. Anyway the way I see it is you need insurance to drive a car and you can buy to have insurance really cheaply but in effect get basically no cover for damage or accident.
PRetty much it's a licence for insurance companies to print money.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:53,
archived)
PRetty much it's a licence for insurance companies to print money.
I'm not defending them;
they are rip-off merchants. but so are the general public, it is chicken/egg. My friend works in car insurance and nearly every claim that now comes in for men under 25 says there were 5 people in the car and they all have whiplash.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:58,
archived)
It's kind of anti-gambling.
I work in insurance software. There can be up to 20 or so factors that are used in calculating a motor insurance quote. The rates used are based on the statistical findings for that particular category, e.g. postcode, mileage, engine size, where you keep your car, etc.
Think of the history of the individual as kind of a trump card...
But yeah, just like a casino or a bookmaker, if the underwriters have done their job properly the insurance company will always win.
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:02,
archived)
Think of the history of the individual as kind of a trump card...
But yeah, just like a casino or a bookmaker, if the underwriters have done their job properly the insurance company will always win.
Well they always sorta win.
They don't have you pay out. It's in the own interest to pay out a little as possible.
I'm guessing there a formula somewhere which works out the lowest payout level to the least number of paying customers lost.
Additionally if you write insurance softerware, are you a merekat?
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:14,
archived)
I'm guessing there a formula somewhere which works out the lowest payout level to the least number of paying customers lost.
Additionally if you write insurance softerware, are you a merekat?
You should bloody well still have to pay insurance like the rest of us.
That's discrimination that is!
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:15,
archived)
If anyone's interested-
This is a pretty good radio show. A couple of hours left.
www.live365.com/stations/kxlu1?site=pro
( ,
Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:56,
archived)
www.live365.com/stations/kxlu1?site=pro