
all of those words just spell delicious :D
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:01,
archived)

that sounds so much better than a bacon sandwich with crispy lettuce and tomato.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:05,
archived)

read this if you have time:
www.animalsandsociety.org/assets/462_mitchellsa.pdf
fascinating stuff about how the brain accepts things like animal farming in the same way people did the holocaust.
Genuinely great read for anyone interested in how the brain works.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:08,
archived)
www.animalsandsociety.org/assets/462_mitchellsa.pdf
fascinating stuff about how the brain accepts things like animal farming in the same way people did the holocaust.
Genuinely great read for anyone interested in how the brain works.

I suppose if you were brought on tofu and such then you'd be used to it.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:11,
archived)

so they are the healthier choice.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:19,
archived)

Well, that looks like nonsense. It utterly ignored the differences between persons and non-persons - comparing animal husbandry to the holocaust is only going to be plausible if you think that farm-animals are persons, or Jews non-persons. Both of these would be false.
The language is loaded, therefore question-begging.
Also, this paper ignores all the important philosophical work that's been done on animal welfare in the last 40 years - it doesn't even cite Singer or Rachels, who would be plausible allies, let alone give a hearing to those who think that nonhumans are of little to no moral importance.
How does stuff like this pass peer-review, grumble grumble.
Right: I'm off to spend an afternoon doing real philosophy. Dispassionately. With arguments.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:24,
archived)
The language is loaded, therefore question-begging.
Also, this paper ignores all the important philosophical work that's been done on animal welfare in the last 40 years - it doesn't even cite Singer or Rachels, who would be plausible allies, let alone give a hearing to those who think that nonhumans are of little to no moral importance.
How does stuff like this pass peer-review, grumble grumble.
Right: I'm off to spend an afternoon doing real philosophy. Dispassionately. With arguments.

the holocaust comment I made is a very tiny comparison made almost as an aside, its not what the blokes paper is about.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:28,
archived)

So long as it's not going on under your nose and there's offical sanction, it's okay, even when it's not. That said, pigs aren't animals and they're very tasty, whereas jewish people aren't tasty and complain more
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:37,
archived)

There's a lot of highly morally loaded language in there, and precious little argument to support it. And there remains a big, big, big problem along the lines that comparing treatments of different kinds of animal in this way is only ever going to be more than empty formalism if there is some serious sense in which the animals are morally comparable. That doesn't seem to be established here.
I simply don't buy the argument - not least because the important bits are left out.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:37,
archived)
I simply don't buy the argument - not least because the important bits are left out.

and they sound like, "I like meat, they're animals, shut up".
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:47,
archived)

It sounded like 'comments..sound..meat'. Coincidentally the new album by Nine Inch Nails.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:51,
archived)

and now we're caught in a sexual allegory :(
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:53,
archived)

"Whenever and wherever possible, it is important that nonhuman farming be portrayed as abusive in its essential character, even in its supposedly more benign forms such as “free range,” “traditional,” or “grass fed.” It needs to be apprehended by the public as a system in which nonhumans are held captive, mutilated, controlled, impregnated, castrated, and killed."
...what did they think happened on farms?
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 15:06,
archived)
...what did they think happened on farms?

are enought to tell me there is no point me reading the article.
I do hope everyone's high horses are being treated ethically though!
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 15:39,
archived)
I do hope everyone's high horses are being treated ethically though!

I a few days in December as a hand on a farm for pigs and cattle - sorry, I mean an institution for the abuse of nonhumans.
Mmmm, tasty, tasty nonhumans.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 15:48,
archived)
Mmmm, tasty, tasty nonhumans.

You see ^This^ is whay I hate the fact the internet is text based... I simply can't tell if people are being sarcastic or genuine. I really hope you don't mean that :(
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:09,
archived)

as for Tofu I've never ventured to try it but my brain immediately tells me as I've tasted soya milk before then Tofu isn't going to be a pleasant experience.
( ,
Mon 18 Apr 2011, 14:14,
archived)