
But I don't get why they want to get married, when Ye Goode Booke is quite specifically against it.
Mind, I don't get much of why you'd be into Christianity as a gay in general anyway, so maybe I should just shut up and carry on with my knitting.
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 11:54,
archived)
Mind, I don't get much of why you'd be into Christianity as a gay in general anyway, so maybe I should just shut up and carry on with my knitting.

img.ly/images/4299990/full
Details marriage in the bible rather well.
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:04,
archived)
Details marriage in the bible rather well.

I'm glad the 4th one is no longer law! I don't want to keep them or loose money :(
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:07,
archived)

skepticsannotatedbible.com/women/long.html
It's actually marked "Misogyny" but it showcases the Bible's attitude towards the fairer sex all the better for that.
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 13:54,
archived)
It's actually marked "Misogyny" but it showcases the Bible's attitude towards the fairer sex all the better for that.

I even understand people wanting to get married in churches purely based on architectural choice.
But wanting to get married in the eyes of a lord that hates you is very weird.
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:06,
archived)
But wanting to get married in the eyes of a lord that hates you is very weird.

but does that hold with other houses of worship for different faiths?
i dunno, i tend to keep out of it as i'm not learned on such stuff.
it just sounds like a rebrand of cival partnership, but with some new locations, to me, but then what do i know.
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:26,
archived)
i dunno, i tend to keep out of it as i'm not learned on such stuff.
it just sounds like a rebrand of cival partnership, but with some new locations, to me, but then what do i know.

"Jesus hates pretty much anything you want him to"
I'm sure plenty of Christians ignore the one line in the new testament against homosexuality, especially as it is listed alongside being drunk as a sin in that particular list. If they have a problem with gay weddings, they should have a problem with anyone getting drunk at a wedding too.
I can't help but feel that the making out being gay is specifically at odds with Christianity when 90% of the modern world is at odds with some part of the bible, is fueling a lot of homophobia. The media likes conflict, but I don't think gays vs Christians is entirely true.
I wonder if the thing many Christians have a problem with is simply change. Ultimately, religion is going to be attractive to people who like tradition.
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:51,
archived)
I'm sure plenty of Christians ignore the one line in the new testament against homosexuality, especially as it is listed alongside being drunk as a sin in that particular list. If they have a problem with gay weddings, they should have a problem with anyone getting drunk at a wedding too.
I can't help but feel that the making out being gay is specifically at odds with Christianity when 90% of the modern world is at odds with some part of the bible, is fueling a lot of homophobia. The media likes conflict, but I don't think gays vs Christians is entirely true.
I wonder if the thing many Christians have a problem with is simply change. Ultimately, religion is going to be attractive to people who like tradition.


so whatever it says is irrelevant anyway
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:07,
archived)

which I thought sort of summed it up, I don't really think religion has much part in the whole thing: "the question comes down to whether you see marriage as a religious institution or a secular one. I don’t think, in reality, that we can say anymore that in this country it is a religious institution. The state recognises marriages made in many religious traditions and also marriages made without any religious tradition being involved. It is pretty clear that it is a secular institution. Therefore, the decision about what ‘marriage’ is shouldn’t be based on what anyone’s holy book says, but on what is best for people and for the state. Personally, I can’t see how you could argue that gay marriage is bad on either of those grounds, and it has clear benefits to the individuals who want to get married, so it should be allowed so long as no individuals or Churches who don't want to be involved aren't forced to be (which they aren't). There ought to be nothing more to the debate than that."
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:31,
archived)

But I suppose my mate and his wife got hitched in a non-god ceremony thing, so, yeah. Gays should be allowed to do that.
Just not religious marriage, or whatever (depending on whether or not that religion wants to marry gays, in which case I'd say it should be quite welcome to say either way).
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:36,
archived)
Just not religious marriage, or whatever (depending on whether or not that religion wants to marry gays, in which case I'd say it should be quite welcome to say either way).

Facebook is not for intelligence, it is for POST THIS ON UR WAL IF UR AGENST GAYS AND RAPE IGNORE IF U WANT A VIRUS
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:39,
archived)

WILL U BE IN THE 2 PERSENT THAT DO???
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 12:54,
archived)

Also, in ancient Greece it wasn't uncommon to have same sex marriages.
But I have no idea why people want religions that frown on that sort of thing to marry them. Just invent your own version of that religion, that's what everyone has done historically because it's all made up bollocks anyway.
( ,
Tue 5 Feb 2013, 13:19,
archived)
But I have no idea why people want religions that frown on that sort of thing to marry them. Just invent your own version of that religion, that's what everyone has done historically because it's all made up bollocks anyway.