
which must be in the database somewhere
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B3ta
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:45,
archived)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B3ta

i'm guessing about 2.1 jiggabytes
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:47,
archived)

such knowledge would surely kill you
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:48,
archived)

*brain explodes*
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:51,
archived)

but that doesn't include all the images that you lot host and the odd bit of flash we sometimes stick on free servers.
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:53,
archived)

i'm guessing you have unlimited bandwidth then.. bet your host loves you! =P
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:55,
archived)

we have a set amount.
Anyway. No more questions as I am off to town for a bite to eat.
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:56,
archived)
Anyway. No more questions as I am off to town for a bite to eat.

Probably a bit like bytes. That is - salty.
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:58,
archived)

but he says "the site uses around 2 terrabytes a month" so i guess not...
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 21:01,
archived)

and i would pronounce giga with a g and not a j.. and it sounds funnier to use a j, because BTTF is so old-fashioned..
oh i dunno...
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 21:12,
archived)
oh i dunno...

it's a myth propagated by hosting companies with watertight abuse policies
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:59,
archived)

and they haven't tried to reign me in yet. So far they've been unlimited with everyone as far as I've heard.
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 21:08,
archived)

next to the best of the board
but i don't understand the point of it, it's more of a news thing, seeing as the newsletter is for links..
it's not had links in ages really..
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:49,
archived)
but i don't understand the point of it, it's more of a news thing, seeing as the newsletter is for links..
it's not had links in ages really..

if we filled the blog with links then it would compete with the newsletter.
ho-hum
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:51,
archived)
ho-hum

As previously stated, b3ta is very puerile. Although images which could be interpreted as being pornographic are not shown explicitly, and marked 'NSFW' – 'Not Safe For Work' – b3ta's content is considered by many to be distasteful. b3ta also holds the somewhat dubious honour of being one – if not the only – website to be banned under six categories by web filtering company N2H2 (see database.n2h2.com/cgi-perl/catrpt.pl). Some of these categories, particularly 'Nudity' and 'Sex', are seen as undeserved by some. Regardless, many companies and schools use N2H2 to filter out their employees' or students' web requests, and b3ta undeniably reduces office productivity.
that's great
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:46,
archived)
that's great

but swearing is hardly NSFW now, seeing as b3ta doesn't allow <h1> anyway...
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:48,
archived)

I'll have to start looking at it at work then...
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:50,
archived)

that is one detailed article, I'm not convinced it's 100% accurate, but pretty good.
( ,
Mon 12 Jul 2004, 20:52,
archived)