I figure anyone
within a 10 meter radius would be destroyed instantly.
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:10,
archived)
and why they are never all driving at the same time (Thank God)
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:25,
archived)
I believe you
I'm scared but vaguely optimistic at the good stuff that will come with this change
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:09,
archived)
like your grandson standing there looking terrified
surrounded by tooth shrapnel
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:11,
archived)
It actually
happens the exact instant you turn 80, your mouth turns into a deadly tooth shrapnel weapon.
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:12,
archived)
Hahahahaha
you could use them as support weaponry in a battle
*imagines 40 OAPs strapped to a tank*
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:12,
archived)
*imagines 40 OAPs strapped to a tank*
It would be a bit random
Depending on the times of their respective births.
/getcoat
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:14,
archived)
/getcoat
WOO!
happy birthday granda...BLAMM
(presents and young children splattered over the back wall)
I would have drawn this, but meh... I'm eating
and it would have been a pile of crap.
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:13,
archived)
(presents and young children splattered over the back wall)
I would have drawn this, but meh... I'm eating
and it would have been a pile of crap.
Do it anyway!
go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on go on
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:18,
archived)
people having their 80th birthdays:
The new weapon against terror.
Woo yay!
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:16,
archived)
Woo yay!
either, really
you know how it is, once somebody develops a new weapon, the soviets steal it and sell it to middle eastern terrorist groups
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:18,
archived)
That would be a potential political scandal!
Maybe it would be called...
Colgate.
I'm sorry
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:19,
archived)
Colgate.
I'm sorry
I wanna see someone use a chicken cannon
buk-kuuuuuuuuuukBANG!
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:20,
archived)
I managed to avoid saying this even though I thought it every time I scanned past
*adores*
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:23,
archived)
*adores*
no the US is more like this:
somebody develops a new weapon, the US condemns it, and starts a worldwide campaign to stop its use. Then the US invades countries it doesn't like and claim they are using it, and then doesn't sign the treaty for not using it that it started in the first place.
The Republicans say it's unfair to the American manufacturers to stop them prodicing the new weapon, and the Democrats say we need it to help poor countries.
THAT's what the US does
( ,
Fri 10 Jun 2005, 19:26,
archived)
The Republicans say it's unfair to the American manufacturers to stop them prodicing the new weapon, and the Democrats say we need it to help poor countries.
THAT's what the US does