
Stop this people, for the love of cunting fuck - stop this filth.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 18:55,
archived)

1) Sometimes, if the tea levels run too low
2) I don't really know myself
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 18:57,
archived)
2) I don't really know myself

Our sainsburys local has a great deal on cookies at the moment. They're 70p each, but £1 for 3 packs.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:03,
archived)

from Spar, 2 packs for a paaaaand I tells ya!
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:05,
archived)

It results in tea that looks a bit weird when you put milk in, but really wakes you up.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:04,
archived)

drinking, I've never heard of such a thing. I may try it, although it'll likely end up with either fire, noise or destruction of property, knowing me
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:05,
archived)

It was cadburys instant with a bit of nescafe. I made it by accident first, as I was making some chocolate and my mum put coffee in the cup =( I don't usually like coffee.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:07,
archived)

I emptied 30 teabags into the filter and switched it on.
There were many, many angry coffee drinkers.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:08,
archived)
There were many, many angry coffee drinkers.

Tremendously expensive, but a lovely cuppa.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:07,
archived)

they destroy economies just to placate middle class idiots.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:07,
archived)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_trade_debate
I wasn't aware of the criticism - and it's certainly interesting.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:25,
archived)
I wasn't aware of the criticism - and it's certainly interesting.

www.iea.org.uk/files/upld-book408pdf?.pdf
It's fair - it discusses the positives as well as the negatives, unlike ranting Manleys.
Wikipedia isn't very good on subjects like this as most people are ignorant but enthusiastic on the subject.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:29,
archived)
It's fair - it discusses the positives as well as the negatives, unlike ranting Manleys.
Wikipedia isn't very good on subjects like this as most people are ignorant but enthusiastic on the subject.

Because other employers will be obliged to offer wages at or close to those being
offered by the Fair Trade organisation, the benefit is more widely spread than just
among those producer households which are employed by, or which supply, the
local Fair Trade organisation. Fair Trade, therefore, does not distort the market for
labour and so is not unfair to other workers who are not employed by Fair Trade
employers. On the contrary, it helps these employees as well.
But this is, in practise, bollocks. Fairtrade means that there is a higher wage paid to a small select group who then force prices up - in subsistance economies this change can mean the deaths of many workers.
In Africa I saw huge problems associated with American forces paying western wages. We paid our locally sourced labour arounf £1.50 a week. This was a good wage and many wanted the work.
The Americans paid western wages.
Can you imagine what would happen if, for example, a security company in Basingstoke started offering 150 jobs paying £3million a year, without other companies following suit.
The workers who get roles within fairtrade farms are far outweighed by those who do not, thus the economy does not force a rise in the wages of others. In fact, those who have not got a fairtrade status are selling less and so the fairtrade company grows at the expense of the others.
In the long term this will mean that, with the tiny amount given extra, comparatively, to workers, wages might double, but costs will double too, nobody will be richer and thousands starve to death along the way - it is like carbon offsetting, a tool to keep the middle classes happy and to rake in a huge profit from them which, in reality, does nothing positive and, in fact, costs hundreds of lives - much better to stop buying cut flowers from Africa than to go fairtrade - it's shit.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:26,
archived)
offered by the Fair Trade organisation, the benefit is more widely spread than just
among those producer households which are employed by, or which supply, the
local Fair Trade organisation. Fair Trade, therefore, does not distort the market for
labour and so is not unfair to other workers who are not employed by Fair Trade
employers. On the contrary, it helps these employees as well.
But this is, in practise, bollocks. Fairtrade means that there is a higher wage paid to a small select group who then force prices up - in subsistance economies this change can mean the deaths of many workers.
In Africa I saw huge problems associated with American forces paying western wages. We paid our locally sourced labour arounf £1.50 a week. This was a good wage and many wanted the work.
The Americans paid western wages.
Can you imagine what would happen if, for example, a security company in Basingstoke started offering 150 jobs paying £3million a year, without other companies following suit.
The workers who get roles within fairtrade farms are far outweighed by those who do not, thus the economy does not force a rise in the wages of others. In fact, those who have not got a fairtrade status are selling less and so the fairtrade company grows at the expense of the others.
In the long term this will mean that, with the tiny amount given extra, comparatively, to workers, wages might double, but costs will double too, nobody will be richer and thousands starve to death along the way - it is like carbon offsetting, a tool to keep the middle classes happy and to rake in a huge profit from them which, in reality, does nothing positive and, in fact, costs hundreds of lives - much better to stop buying cut flowers from Africa than to go fairtrade - it's shit.

Then we felt that it tasted better than PG anyway.
And PG disagrees with me.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:13,
archived)
And PG disagrees with me.

The fair trade movement claims that the products it provides are sourced “justly” and that purchasing fair trade products brings economic benefits for the poor.
Whilst it is clear that fair trade might bring some benefits to particular groups, whether it brings significant net benefits to the poor in general is questionable. Moreover, the claim that fair trade transactions are more “just” cannot be substantiated.
Customers also might be surprised to learn that the majority of the Fairtrade Foundation’s income is spent on promoting its own brand.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:18,
archived)
Whilst it is clear that fair trade might bring some benefits to particular groups, whether it brings significant net benefits to the poor in general is questionable. Moreover, the claim that fair trade transactions are more “just” cannot be substantiated.
Customers also might be surprised to learn that the majority of the Fairtrade Foundation’s income is spent on promoting its own brand.

but I prefer English Breakfast tea from Sainsbury - much better than the Twinings ones.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:07,
archived)

and that one looks to have a used condom floating in it.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:10,
archived)

he'd have to climb for a long time on the ladder of life before he even reached the mental rung.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 18:57,
archived)

I see the truth in it...
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 18:57,
archived)

...the year of the blond streaked mullet... the monolith has replicated itself and consumed Jupiter... humanity turns to the mullet...
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:03,
archived)

years ago. But it was pretty much one of the first movies I remember seeing, so that's not saying much.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 18:59,
archived)

First movie I can recall at the pictures is Bambi.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:03,
archived)

I did get it from your pretty pictures though (I didn;t notice the title in the middle as Im fucking stupid)
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:07,
archived)

it could easily be one of the most demented things I've ever drawn if you've never heard of the film before
(and comes close to that anyway)
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:08,
archived)
(and comes close to that anyway)

"oh I hate thee true....
Blocking Neville's posts from me,
I may as well sniff glue."
*wipes fake tear*
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 18:59,
archived)
Blocking Neville's posts from me,
I may as well sniff glue."
*wipes fake tear*

1) RAngrh! Children's 80's film!
2) RArargh! More of that
3) mental!
4) mental!
5) ragrhahh!
6) *obscure and irrelevant reference to the current Olympic Logo "bandwagon"*
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:01,
archived)
2) RArargh! More of that
3) mental!
4) mental!
5) ragrhahh!
6) *obscure and irrelevant reference to the current Olympic Logo "bandwagon"*

client references before being asked to create the branding for the next Olympic Games
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 19:06,
archived)