b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7395045 (Thread)

#
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:00, archived)
# is that an offer?
TJ: can any vector experts tell me where I'm going wrong here? (apart from the fact that the hair isn't done and the model is hideous, naturally)

(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:01, archived)
# Yes.
You appear to have spunked all over the image.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:07, archived)
# is that wrong?
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:09, archived)
# For this particular image,
yes.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:10, archived)
# why do you think you are going wrong?
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:09, archived)
# the eyes don't look right.
nor the mouth.

I'm not sure why.

You were very helpful when I butchered my last vector.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:11, archived)
# i can't really see anything objectionable there
the eyes are fine, and the mouth just looks like an insincere smile
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:13, archived)
# oh fair enough then.
it's supposed to look like an insincere smile, so I guess I can't be going as far wrong as I thought. Ta.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:15, archived)
# looks fine to me.
if you want to take some of the harshness out of it you could always feather your selections before filling them, or fill them with a modified gradient fill ( modify it so the very outer edges get the fade ). If you are using A.I. you could always try the gradient mesh route. ( I think it's hard to learn that stuff but by christ it gives professional results. )
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:32, archived)
# that is a bloke I used to live with who is called Steve
AICMFP
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:09, archived)
# or not
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:15, archived)
# use paths
and less colour levels. drink more beer. and trust me on the sunscreen.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:09, archived)
# less colour levels?
it is using paths though.. or the Paintshop Pro equivalent..
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:12, archived)
# fucking sunscreen
bollocks
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:13, archived)
# the baby oil -25 factor
sunscreen
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:15, archived)
# bukkake
is where it's going wrong
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:10, archived)
# Matt Walker
what are you doing on my screen?
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:17, archived)
# Matt Walker?
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:19, archived)
# what an odd name to give your daughter
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:01, archived)
# I read that story too, uncomfortbale reading
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:02, archived)
# yes - moi aussi
the wikipeado page is more technical but no less... upsetting

/activist blog
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:04, archived)
# Not usually one to get placards out about things
But this should be stopped
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:08, archived)
# what story would this be?
*hasn't a clue*
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:11, archived)
# Cutting off women's soft parts
Without anaesthetic, when they're about five years old. Sewing them shut. And giving the man who marries them a KNIFE to cut them open with on their wedding night!
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:14, archived)
# do you reckon they cut the cake with it first?
/sorry, dark humour
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:18, archived)
# nice!!
a sort of female jew snip then
i don't know if i like the idea
but "pierce packaging with straw" is making me laugh
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:19, archived)
# Fucking hell!
There's something very, very wrong with a lot of people on this planet.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:21, archived)
#
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:14, archived)
# Someone at work
(who doesn't know of b3ta) forwarded me your Spice Girls image today. It's doing the rounds.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:14, archived)
# That whole business is horrific
And gives me fear
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:03, archived)
# these maybe?
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:03, archived)
# hahahaha
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:07, archived)
# A TOAP?
From you sir?!
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:09, archived)
# fuck it... I'm tired of trying
(, Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:15, archived)