TODAY'S TALK IS ON GENTLEMEN
The term gentleman (from Latin genitalismaximushomo meaning man who acts like he has a big cock cognate with the French word gentilhomme and the Italian gentil uomo or gentiluomo) in its original and strict signification denoted a man of good family the Latin generosus (its invariable translation in English-Latin documents).
William Harrison says 'gentlemen be those whom their race and blood or at the least their virtuse do make noble and known and stuff'. A gentleman was in his time usually expected to have a coat of arms this was not a coat of arms as we know it today but a coat fashioned from chimpanzee arms. A gentleman would use the little hands to carry around his worldly posessions it wasn't until around 1600 that pockets were invented.

Shakespeare himself was demonstrated by the grant of his coat of arms to be no 'vagabond' but a gentleman. The inseparability of arms and gentility is shown by two of his characters:
Petruchio: I swear I'll cuff you if you strike again.
Katharine: So may you lose your arms: If you strike me you are no gentleman;
And if no gentleman why then no arms.
Petruchio: You can take my life you can take my freedom but you'll never have my monkey jacket
(The taming of the schrew. Act II Scene i.)
Although the monkey coat was highly important for early gentelmen in later years a gentleman was defined by his actions rather than social status. Social decorum ettiquette and manners all became part of being a gentleman.
Social Decorum was first invented by Lord Chesterfield in 1725 in an attempt to unify several different white papers which had been submitted on manners and etiquette. Lord Chesterfield was forced later to reduce his paper on conduct due to constant changes in the rules governing social behaviour.
Unfortunately for Lord Chesterfield he was hoisted by his own petard he'd failed to keep up with the rules of etiquette spending too much time in the house of lords and not enough time keeping his elbows of his well polished dining table. In 1732 Chesterfield demanded several of his guests removed their underpants and prepared to be inspected for lice. While this would have been socially acceptable in 1725 it was considered at the time to be the biggest social faux pas in history.
Chesterfield's guests were governed by the rules of social etiquette and were forced to go along with this request rather than speak out to Lord Chesterfield. One guest even posed for a commisioned picture of the act (See below) crouching with his buttocks exposed for 6 hours. The embarassment was too much for Chesterfield and he never recovered. It is recorded that on his deathbed his last words were 'damn and blast those stupid lice'

It was after this terrible incident that the Emperor of Britain decided that the strict rules of social etiquette should no longer apply to gentlemen and they should be judged to be a gentlemen based on social standards of the time rather than rules and social status.
In 1731 the act of being a gentlemen was so popular that The Gentleman's Magazine was founded in London by Edward cave . The original complete title was The Gentleman's Magazine: or Trader's monthly intelligencer. Cave's innovation was to create a monthly digest of news and commentary on any topic the educated public might be interested in from commodity prices to Latin poetry. 'storehouse') for a periodical.
The earliest eddition in existence today is the 1755 issue where a competition was held for single men around the country to draw a picture of what a naked lady might look like.
The compeition was judged by a man called Burt Ringledinc The Third who said he had seen his wife naked once. Charles Weisenthal won this competition with the entry below which later became the first blueprint for a modern sewing machine. Some historians today believe that Charles Weisenthal wasn't that close with his illustration and question the authenicaty of Mr. Ringledinc's claim that he had seen his wife naked.

(,
Mon 3 Sep 2007, 0:09,
archived)
The term gentleman (from Latin genitalismaximushomo meaning man who acts like he has a big cock cognate with the French word gentilhomme and the Italian gentil uomo or gentiluomo) in its original and strict signification denoted a man of good family the Latin generosus (its invariable translation in English-Latin documents).
William Harrison says 'gentlemen be those whom their race and blood or at the least their virtuse do make noble and known and stuff'. A gentleman was in his time usually expected to have a coat of arms this was not a coat of arms as we know it today but a coat fashioned from chimpanzee arms. A gentleman would use the little hands to carry around his worldly posessions it wasn't until around 1600 that pockets were invented.

Shakespeare himself was demonstrated by the grant of his coat of arms to be no 'vagabond' but a gentleman. The inseparability of arms and gentility is shown by two of his characters:
Petruchio: I swear I'll cuff you if you strike again.
Katharine: So may you lose your arms: If you strike me you are no gentleman;
And if no gentleman why then no arms.
Petruchio: You can take my life you can take my freedom but you'll never have my monkey jacket
(The taming of the schrew. Act II Scene i.)
Although the monkey coat was highly important for early gentelmen in later years a gentleman was defined by his actions rather than social status. Social decorum ettiquette and manners all became part of being a gentleman.
Social Decorum was first invented by Lord Chesterfield in 1725 in an attempt to unify several different white papers which had been submitted on manners and etiquette. Lord Chesterfield was forced later to reduce his paper on conduct due to constant changes in the rules governing social behaviour.
Unfortunately for Lord Chesterfield he was hoisted by his own petard he'd failed to keep up with the rules of etiquette spending too much time in the house of lords and not enough time keeping his elbows of his well polished dining table. In 1732 Chesterfield demanded several of his guests removed their underpants and prepared to be inspected for lice. While this would have been socially acceptable in 1725 it was considered at the time to be the biggest social faux pas in history.
Chesterfield's guests were governed by the rules of social etiquette and were forced to go along with this request rather than speak out to Lord Chesterfield. One guest even posed for a commisioned picture of the act (See below) crouching with his buttocks exposed for 6 hours. The embarassment was too much for Chesterfield and he never recovered. It is recorded that on his deathbed his last words were 'damn and blast those stupid lice'
It was after this terrible incident that the Emperor of Britain decided that the strict rules of social etiquette should no longer apply to gentlemen and they should be judged to be a gentlemen based on social standards of the time rather than rules and social status.
In 1731 the act of being a gentlemen was so popular that The Gentleman's Magazine was founded in London by Edward cave . The original complete title was The Gentleman's Magazine: or Trader's monthly intelligencer. Cave's innovation was to create a monthly digest of news and commentary on any topic the educated public might be interested in from commodity prices to Latin poetry. 'storehouse') for a periodical.
The earliest eddition in existence today is the 1755 issue where a competition was held for single men around the country to draw a picture of what a naked lady might look like.
The compeition was judged by a man called Burt Ringledinc The Third who said he had seen his wife naked once. Charles Weisenthal won this competition with the entry below which later became the first blueprint for a modern sewing machine. Some historians today believe that Charles Weisenthal wasn't that close with his illustration and question the authenicaty of Mr. Ringledinc's claim that he had seen his wife naked.

and no it's not me. i should be so lucky as to have maurice dean wint's stunning visage.
(,
Mon 3 Sep 2007, 0:21,
archived)
well done sir. well done indeed.
(,
Mon 3 Sep 2007, 0:26,
archived)
and build this new pc
(,
Mon 3 Sep 2007, 0:36,
archived)
You think you could out-clever us French folk with your silly knees-bent running about advancing behaviour?
I wave my private parts at your auntie you cheesy lot of second-hand electric donkey-bottom biters.

(,
Mon 3 Sep 2007, 0:36,
archived)
I wave my private parts at your auntie you cheesy lot of second-hand electric donkey-bottom biters.

you are clearly very well educated
(,
Mon 3 Sep 2007, 0:15,
archived)
I learn so much from you. Not least that you are ever-so-slightly bonkers.
I hope you do laydees soon. In a Harry Enfield stylee :)
Edit: Oops I see you've already been called bonkers. Well that adds weight to my comment.

(,
Mon 3 Sep 2007, 0:15,
archived)
I hope you do laydees soon. In a Harry Enfield stylee :)
Edit: Oops I see you've already been called bonkers. Well that adds weight to my comment.

If so . . . I will need a few moments to digest . . . this . . .
(,
Mon 3 Sep 2007, 0:25,
archived)
Question 1: who was the father of Burt Ringledinc The Third's children?
(,
Mon 3 Sep 2007, 0:28,
archived)


