![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Low Budget Film Remakes"){kind=small}
Quickie for the compo
From the Low Budget Film Remakes challenge. See all 715 entries (closed)
(
deathsquirrel Oh dear.,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:06,
archived)
hehhehebetter than the real film :D
(
Rev. Jesse. broke his ankle,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:08,
archived)
^The film was the biggest pile of shaky cam monster wank that I've ever had the misfortune to see.
prodigy69 broke b3ta and made everyone leave,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:10,
archived)
^Thisthisthisthis Total arsegravy
( We are the lemon irked your craw on,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:11,
archived)
yep. Watch The Host instead.
WHTRZ Corp dosen't like the sound of Rupert watching porn,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:13,
archived)
I endorse this opinion.
The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:14,
archived)
And I endorse yours. Lets go out for dinner sometime. WHTRZ Corp dosen't like the sound of Rupert watching porn,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:16,
archived)
really? I actually liked it....supposed to be a sequel in the works too...
(
theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:13,
archived)
this is the best review of anything ever
Mighty Nibus who dares gins | @nibus,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:13,
archived)
agreedit wasnt great - the monster wasnt bad, but the camera work was poop!
( Rev. Jesse. broke his ankle,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:14,
archived)
It wasn't a brilliant filmbut it was enjoyable
so there!
(so there!
The Coast Of Yemen,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:14,
archived)
I thought it was pretty good. monkdagola but how do you TURN a phrase?,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:32,
archived)
the 'funny' guywas just annoying and not nearly funny enough, the monsters were laughably poor... the atmospherics were good.
Good made for TV film.
(Good made for TV film.
Prof UnderCover evitable,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:11,
archived)
*Gasps again* Colonel Dracula Two manky hookers and a racist dwarf,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:13,
archived)
(most of) the women weren't hot enoughvirtually all of the men were uggos, the dialogue was poor, the army were too fat, the coffee was cold... the dust was too big... the rats were badly acted, there was too much sound, the picture was too left-centric, the camera man was underpaid, the dark wasn't dark enough, the sandwiches had spread rather than butter...
( Prof UnderCover evitable,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:18,
archived)
Now get a camcorder and run around for a bit.
Mstandot I suppose I should post more often.,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:09,
archived)
That is an annoying way to film.I wish directors would stop using it.
( We are the lemon irked your craw on,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:10,
archived)
me too. it gives me a headache.i still haven't seen diary of the dead because i'm afraid it'll suck
( Tom OBedlam I have control of a tank,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:16,
archived)
My review on IMDB was removed.mind you all it said was " will someone buy that cunt a steadycam?"
( Pasanonic 's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:24,
archived)
plus make it so darkyou cant see what happening :D
( Rev. Jesse. broke his ankle,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:11,
archived)
This.Why can't we have an invasion in daylight!!
( Mstandot I suppose I should post more often.,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:13,
archived)
bit like lostso much of that i miss by it being in the jungle at night with no light :D
( Rev. Jesse. broke his ankle,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:17,
archived)
Rarrrrgghh!
Faceboke Graffitti!
monkdagola but how do you TURN a phrase?,
Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:24,
archived)
