b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8699174 (Thread)

# :)
www.gcse.com/english/less.htm

edit: i didn't know either ;)
(I helped save b3ta! kingsuperspecial is in an audience, wanking furiously, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:14, archived)
# Makes sense
(I helped save b3ta! ClanSoul, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:20, archived)
# It's one of those pointless distinctions that rile people up
I don't see why I have to distinguish between large numbers of small things (less sugar) and small numbers of large things (fewer shoes). Why can't I use one term for both?

On the other hand, people better not be misusing "insure" and "ensure" around me... :)
(I helped save b3ta! The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:20, archived)
# please insure you renew your ensurance ;)
(I helped save b3ta! kingsuperspecial is in an audience, wanking furiously, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:21, archived)
# *shakes fist*
(I helped save b3ta! The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:23, archived)
# *shake's fist*
;-P
(I helped save b3ta! kingsuperspecial is in an audience, wanking furiously, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:24, archived)
# *shakes fi'st*
(I helped save b3ta! Mystery_Bob, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:25, archived)
# what is the sailing word with all the apostrophees
foc's'ale? something like that. bring it on you pedants ;)
(I helped save b3ta! Avast is still alive!!!!, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:33, archived)
# fo'c'sle
forward of the castle

edit: (although it could be fo'c'sl'e or f'o'c'sl'e - dunno)
(I helped save b3ta! kingsuperspecial is in an audience, wanking furiously, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:37, archived)
# thats the baby
ta
(I helped save b3ta! Avast is still alive!!!!, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:40, archived)
# Life assurance.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:25, archived)
# Hahah.
(I helped save b3ta! the_rhyme_minister has a little bit of gold and a pager, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:25, archived)
# I hope it costs fewer this year.


(I helped save b3ta! Mstandot I suppose I should post more often., Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:42, archived)
# it's where you look at them after they say their little bit of grammar nazi
ponder it a moment

then punch them in the face

"Nobody gives a fuck"

and get on with your life :)
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:22, archived)
# You would have less sugar
if you consider the sugar to be one flowing item, like a liquid. If you were referring to the individual sugar grains, you would use fewer.

I don't make the rules, I just have to slavishly insure that everybody else follows them ;)
(I helped save b3ta! Mystery_Bob, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:23, archived)
# Ahh. But it brings up the old philosophical issue:
I have a pile of sand (or sugar, I suppose but what the hell am I doing with a pile of sugar for fuck's sake?!) and I remove a grain from the top of the pile.

I continue to remove grains from the pile, one at a time; at what point does it stop being a pile of sand? When one grain is left? 10 grains? There is no real distinction between masses of things and groups of things.
(I helped save b3ta! The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:27, archived)
# Sand thief!
:D
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:29, archived)
# When I do a poo on it and rub it into your hair.
Then it's just "smelly hair sand".
(I helped save b3ta! ClanSoul, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:31, archived)
# I sort of know a song about that (sortof)
www.last.fm/music/King+Missile/_/The+Sandbox
(I helped save b3ta! The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:37, archived)
# There may not be a difference philosophically
but there is a difference in everyday language.

If I ask a greengrocer for a bunch of grapes and he hands me a single grape, arguments about philosophy are not going to make me buy it.

[edit] On reflection, i think what you have identified is simply vague language, rather than any philosophical idea. A 'pile' of sand is a relative term which may mean something different to everyone, whereas 'ten tons of sand' is a specific value that there can be no doubt about.
(I helped save b3ta! Mystery_Bob, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:32, archived)
# http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_the_heap
(I helped save b3ta! The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:39, archived)
# You have missed the point.
It is not size dependant, you can have less of anything or fewer of anything.

Less sugar or fewer grains of sugar, fewer shoes or less shoe.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:24, archived)
# I had some shoes that fell apart
so techinically I had less shoe
(I helped save b3ta! discomeats This canoe, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:27, archived)
# You are sort of right:
"Use fewer to describe countable things. Use less to describe uncountable quantities, collective amounts, and degree. These terms are not interchangeable."

It is number dependant, not size-dependant. Or dependent. Whatever.
(I helped save b3ta! The Alchemist king of the needlessly complicated, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:31, archived)
# No, it is not number dependant.
If there are so many it is a bitch to count then it is still countable.

You never have less grains of sugar, no matter how much sugar there is, yet you have less sugar, even if there is only 1 grain left.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 18:37, archived)