You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 263 (Older | Newer)

[challenge entry] Eyed Eggs

My first ever submission: Eyed Eggs!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 21:23, archived)
# That's a really bad pun.
VERY BAD pun.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 21:25, archived)
# Yes indeed
It is eggsellently bad - keep 'em coming...
(, Wed 30 Jan 2002, 5:02, archived)
# My first Googlewhack
malapropos hypothalamus

Only got - 103,740,000
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 19:32, archived)
# all further posting of alleged googlewhacks
should be banned from this board unless accompanied by a photoshopped illustration of said whack. I fear it is the only way to save the board....
(, Wed 30 Jan 2002, 2:52, archived)
# motion carried
brilliant idea.
(, Wed 30 Jan 2002, 4:20, archived)
# Foreshadow Lolitas
It makes sense!

66,624,000,000
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:59, archived)
# Lolitas
are banned....why not move on to pastures new....something like "sluts" or "mature"
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 19:06, archived)
# Fine I claim the first use of 'Internet' in a googlewhack then
Internet Swanskins
106,000,000 x 39 = 4,134,000,000
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 19:54, archived)
# How
do you score a googlewhack? I need to know how katabatic anopheles scores in order to validate my pointless existence.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:52, archived)
# Once you've got your whack (asit were)
enter each word individually, note the number of results, and multiply the 2 numbers.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 19:17, archived)
# Hebridean Photometry
...only scores 2,058,500,000, but it's the first whack I've actually managed!
Wahay!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:13, archived)
# Congratulations
now illustrate it!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:15, archived)
# The question
everyone wants to know the answer to is:

Who will get the first teragooglewhack(tm)?
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:00, archived)
# Frabjinaceous Cytopteradonopoediacs
Well, maybe not.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:14, archived)
# What's that?
Crap score for this one, but
Googolplex Kitties
sounds good, and that's an awful lot of kitties.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:15, archived)
# About this many...

...roughly
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:47, archived)
# its the party elephant
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:54, archived)
# Aww bless 'im
I bet he can sneak up on you with those slippers, too.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:02, archived)
# Breeeeeeel!
We love your animals in casual footwear! :)
(, Wed 30 Jan 2002, 3:29, archived)
# Homicidal volcanology

Another googlewhack gallery entry
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:18, archived)
# I like this idea
Creating pictures to go with Googlewhacks. It's inspired.

More, please.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:20, archived)
# Lazarus (bless his Googlewhacking soul)
is trying to get a gallery going at his site and so far there are 3 pix (2 by your's truly)
so it's less than crowded (and he still can't spell my name)
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:40, archived)
# Yep,
I sent him this one tonight.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:43, archived)
# Anyone
remember The Lost Consonant?
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:52, archived)
# and the crappy one
by me ;)
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:54, archived)
# Pish,
my good man!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:08, archived)
# now the batcat is ready for bed
just needs a pipe


.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:16, archived)
# Ah yes,
I see your point now.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:21, archived)
# Cameron Diaz would like a word.
here.

Erm... I rock! Whoo hoo!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:55, archived)
[challenge entry] Yeyekes
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:55, archived)
# broken
link

try img src="
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:56, archived)
# Hello
Gotta use boring html codes only eye'm afraid.

Welcome, great name btw.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:58, archived)
# thanks
got it
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:00, archived)
# Worth waiting for then.
Eye eye eye!!!!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:06, archived)
# Thank god
the penis is censored or I might have been offended ;)
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:08, archived)
# Fookin 'ell
thats a bit strong aint it? I've just eaten too!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:12, archived)
# is that possible?¿?
in fact I dont really want to know
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:17, archived)
# Have you people
not seen the goatse.cx man?

(DONT CLICK THAT LINK :)
(, Wed 30 Jan 2002, 3:32, archived)
# family resemblance?
Is he related to the goatse girl? maybe their married - damn! that would be one freaky family!
(, Wed 30 Jan 2002, 5:35, archived)
# I've just gipped
I think that's actually worse than the original.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:18, archived)
# Never noticed this before
But isn't it a bit worrying that the guy seems to be married?
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:22, archived)
# Another distinguished member of the Bush family.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:15, archived)
# I feel bad now
I think I'm going to hell.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:13, archived)
# One for the Googlewhacking Gallery

(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:01, archived)
# That's absolutely fantastic
although, slightly racist.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:29, archived)
# Yeh I'm sorry
but it was to illustrate someone's Googlewhack called
"golliwog accountancy".
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:50, archived)
# Jeesus
'Golliwog Accountancy' is a Googlewhack (I think). I hope you knew that before you posted the picture.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:59, archived)
[challenge entry] rub me
for good luck
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 15:32, archived)
# No original ideas left for today

Its a house fly, innit!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 14:38, archived)
# Look, it's changing.....

(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:27, archived)
# Yummy!
There's nothin' like our Danish butter!!!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 18:09, archived)
[challenge entry] It's a fl-eye
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 14:23, archived)
# .
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 13:51, archived)
# That is
terrifying!
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:42, archived)
# great
but it could do with some slippers or something
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 16:55, archived)
# It's a
catacabras.
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 17:40, archived)
# Here's
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 13:20, archived)
[challenge entry] The Queen
'Er MadgeSuddenly realises that is WASN'T an umbrella poking her after all... M'aam
(, Tue 29 Jan 2002, 13:04, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds