isn't it amazing how something so big and powerful can be so delicate?
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 0:12, Reply)
I can't tell if that's terrible or fucking brilliant.
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 0:28, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2OS2pwrZTI&feature=related
all i can say is YUMMY!!
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 0:35, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WffKfxxBGNU&feature=related
Fake??
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 9:54, Reply)
I have seen a video of an unlucky (military) ground controller get sucked into the air intake of a military aircraft though; he survived, but only because the intakes on military jets are rarely big enough to ingest a human being wearing bulky clothes and a helmet etc.
Here it is: www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_wticWfA4Q
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 10:18, Reply)
unless they're alive, in which case it's only awesome
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 2:29, Reply)
This makes me feel all confident inside.
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 0:33, Reply)
It is a "blade out" test where they have to demonstrate that a broken fan blade will not cause the fuselage/passengers to be damaged/injured by shrapnel.
The engine housing/cowling has to able to contain the explosion/debris. The fan blade which they break/shatter (with explosives, via remote control obviously) is the orange & purple one.
Aero engines can ingest some birds without suffering from structural failure (although the engine might stall/lose power), but not entire flocks of them (especially big birds like geese).
www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcALjMJbAvU
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 1:04, Reply)
Almost like he has access to some sort of giant searchable source of technical knowledge from his home PC, but enough of that unbelievable science-fiction crap.
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 3:04, Reply)
I take it your an engineer of sorts then?
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 3:17, Reply)
I just remember seeing one of these destructive tests on a documentary about the A380; it's not the sort of thing you easily forget (explosions and fireworks etc.)
Found it: www.youtube.com/watch?v=j973645y5AA
(they use kevlar or some other kind of uber cloth to contain the shrapnel)
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 10:25, Reply)
was that test succesful?
Seems like an awful lot of smoke / fire / vibration going on in there. Although it's not total catastrophic failure...
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 10:20, Reply)
There was a lot of smoke and fire though; I've seen other tests where that doesn't happen (although the engine is not completely enclosed here. They are just testing the part of the cowling that needs to contain a failure of the front fan; shrapnel coming out of the back of the engine isn't a problem).
The vibration issue is solved by connecting the engine to the wing using pins that are designed to break if the engine vibrates too much (i.e. enough to damage the wing).
They can design for some vibration, but only so much because every blade off event will be unique/not entirely predictable.
(, Wed 11 Feb 2009, 10:34, Reply)