HAHAHA!
Further to a mention on here earlier in the week about those nasty pieces of work from the Westboro 'church'...They've been banned from entering the country.
That's a first, a bit of common sense from out government. yay! I guess that makes me (in their words) a 'fag enabler'.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 17:16, Reply)
I was really, really looking forward to egging them. Surely there's a freedom of speech issue there also?
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 17:18, Reply)
but gloating at the grieving families of soldiers? Telling gays that god hates them? That's not just saying what you want, that's being a grade 'a' non-biodegradable cunt.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 17:29, Reply)
to make their point. They are being denied that right and we are being denied the right to hear and disagree (or agree) with them. Nanny much?
Free speech means what it says. You may not like it but you should allow it - go and argue if you disagree. If you must limit it then I guess incitement to violence might be a line.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 19:46, Reply)
if they made their point in a neutral manner, that is to say they just say it somewhere and if I'm looking for it I can find it, then that's okay.
If they actively go and act in an aggressive or potentially offensive manner at another person's funeral or some gay-marriage thing, etc. then their (teh gheys) freedoms are at risk from crazy people.
Yes, airing one's opinion in a 'neutral' manner does mean less publicity for them, but psst, that's half the point.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 20:12, Reply)
I know it's dangerous to suggest 'common sense' prevail over universally applied law. But in this case, they're the naughty children in the corner who disrupt the class for everyone else. Out they go. Simple as.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 21:32, Reply)
Grow up you twit. Offended yet? Who cares? Free speech is more important than you being offended and if you don't see that, you deserve what we will, very likely, end up with.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 22:05, Reply)
Because they control what is and what is not free speech. I don't trust anybody that much - do you?
(, Fri 20 Feb 2009, 17:40, Reply)
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 20:15, Reply)
They are ignorant and foolish but there's a lot of that around....
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 21:59, Reply)
There is no suppression of free speech here, just the failure of the church to satisfy entry-clearance requirements. They need to show their presence in the UK would be conducive to the public good.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 17:40, Reply)
How scarey.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 19:37, Reply)
..and shout FIRE! FIRE!
is that free speech?
No, its a crime
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 20:08, Reply)
It's fine if there is a fire and spouting the words of a very silly man doesn't make you intelligent.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 22:07, Reply)
Well done that man. Instead of coming out with stupid platitudes why don't you explain to me why freedom of speech is not important. Civil liberties, in this country, are under great threat. I find this very worrying - they are easy to lose but much harder to re-gain. Perhaps you could reassure me that I have nothing to worry about.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 22:45, Reply)
When people decide that they are right, in the face of all evidence, they are known as 'liars'.
As a very sensible person once said, 'everyone is entitled to their own opinions, not their own facts.
I did not encourage violence towards these idiots, but encouraging violence towards others is their entire life.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 22:43, Reply)
why you believe they do not have a right to express their view. I might add that they are very careful not to go beyond what the law allows in terms of incitement (and are quick to sue if anyone attacks them physically). I find their views very unpleasant but they are entitled to express them. That is my point.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 22:50, Reply)
you obviously consider the nazi party in 1933 had a right to spout their 'opinions' of hate.
Good luck to you sir, you will need it.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 22:46, Reply)
They went way beyond expressing an opinion. Is it really so difficult to understand the difference between an opinion expressed verbally and an act of violence? You seem intent on confusing the two. Please try to understand that my belief that people have a right to their opinions does not mean that I agree with those opinions.
Edit: I'm knackered so I'm off to bed. It's been fun.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 22:54, Reply)
never personallly killed anyone
He just spouted his opinions, that made stupid, evil people do so.
You will never understand free speech until you grow up
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 23:08, Reply)
Telling someone to "grow up" when you have no reasonable answer is an ad hominem attack (look it up). It makes you feel better but it doesn't further the discussion.
I may have to invoke Godwin's law at this point.
(, Fri 20 Feb 2009, 17:37, Reply)
which is a suprise for someone so vocal about it.
or maybe not such a suprise, when i think about it.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 20:16, Reply)
It worries me that a lot of people don't seem to get the idea of "Free Speech". It's not free speech except for what I don't like or what offends me. If you don't like what someone says argue with them. Don't ban opinions.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 21:57, Reply)
The more I read what you have written, the less sense it makes.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 22:22, Reply)
Freedom of speech and freedom to enter the UK are not the same thing.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 23:47, Reply)
He seems to be trying to be insulting and funny but failing.
If that is what he means, then in this case they are effectively the same thing. I do accept that there may need to be limits and, maybe, incitement to violence is the line. I'm not at all sure that I really agree even with this but hey, ho.
(, Fri 20 Feb 2009, 17:47, Reply)
Would have made some great TV comedy, if they'd done the chat show circuit...
They would have been crucified.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 17:24, Reply)
is letting them fly here, then be greeted by the cast of that gay musical in IT Crowd. Who can then deny them access through the medium of song.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 19:44, Reply)
"Mrs Phelps-Roper told BBC News Online the decision would "bring great wrath upon your heads"."
Can't they do them under the anti-terrorism laws for saying that? Threatening an entire country with a "great wrath" sounds like the sort of thing a terrorist would say. Fucking lock them up in Guantanamo bay and butt fuck them until they tell the location of their WMD stash. I DEMAND!!!!!
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 17:43, Reply)
But let's for a second assume that the Westboro Church is right...so why do they think their message needs delivering.
Let's put ourselves in the shoes of someone who believes in God. He's powerful. Really fucking powerful. And he knows everything. And he's everywhere....And in the beliefs of the Westboro Church, he's going to fuck every single on of us right over, because he can't fucking stand us.
So why do they believe that they should tell us? We're going to find out sooner or later, right? Has God specifically said that what he really needs is a family to go around bothering people and sneering about what's coming to them?
It's this 'doing God's work' thing..God doesn't need us to do shit, right? God can do EVERYTHING in the blink of a massive eye.
These guys don't even want people to change their behaviour, they merely want you to know how badly their god is going to fuck you. They believe that god already has a punishment lined up for us all...So they've already won the argument (in their opinions)...so, there's no reason to be so angry with the world, is there? .....You won, god is going to punish us, and we'll get what's coming to us...so...drop it.....
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 17:49, Reply)
really fucking well said!
If anything they are being patronising to god, suggesting he can't do it on his own and needs their help!
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 17:53, Reply)
*gets a semi, pulls trousers down*
**again
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 17:58, Reply)
then you could say he's fucking you right now. Infact, by that logic he's also fucking every human being and animal all at the time whether they like it or not. So God's a zoophile-homo-paedo-rapist. I'm sure I must be wrong
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 19:05, Reply)
not that i give a shit about these fucktards because they are irrelivant scum, but i really really hope that when one of them dies theres a shit load of people laughing their heads off at the funeral. KARMA BITCHES its going to bite you hard!
mmmm i went all colonial there, dont know what happened.sorry wont happen again chaps.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 18:47, Reply)
Sounds kinda odd.
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 18:56, Reply)
and I would have thought that would have been their favourite book
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 19:27, Reply)
These fucktards make me so angry. I seriously hope some gay rights group go down there and bum each other in front of them. That will show them!!!
(, Thu 19 Feb 2009, 19:34, Reply)