![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is to reach a point where they can release a movie ONLY in 3D at the cinemas, thereby stopping camcorders from recording them in theatres. If 3D becomes popular enough, you'll never see another 3D and 2D cinema release at the same time - the 2D version will get released weeks later.
( , Sat 16 Jan 2010, 20:26, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Never thought of the piracy thang. Surely not intentional though.
( , Sat 16 Jan 2010, 21:02, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
other than a blockbuster action movie or a kids film gets released in 3D.
Anything aimed at adults and with a decent plot is going to be ruined by having to have pointy-stick moments shoehorned in.
That said, there are 2 moments in Antichrist that would have been fantastic in it.
( , Sat 16 Jan 2010, 22:57, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Sat 16 Jan 2010, 23:05, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
That said, ultimately colour did add very little.
Good black and white films are still good, shit colour films are still shit.
In terms of technological advancement, surely computer games are far more immersing than 3D cinema and thus that area of screen entertainment is far more advanced than cinema will ever be.
Cinema is great for story telling and reflection, so I wish it would stick to that.
( , Sat 16 Jan 2010, 23:31, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Voila, 2d.
( , Sun 17 Jan 2010, 11:45, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Fri 22 Jan 2010, 16:42, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Or (if such things exist) some kind of polarising prism(s) to direct the left and night images to separate CCDs so they can be recorded. The picture can be easily re-merged in post-production and dropped on to the format of your choice.
( , Sun 24 Jan 2010, 13:32, Reply)