
Initially disappointed, but then about half way in, where did he hide that yard of bread?
Again I was interested.
Also one of the popular posts is amusing.
(Scruntwall says no)
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 8:51, Reply)

...didn't you just accuse me of being a racist, and then delete your post?! What was that all about?!
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 9:03, Reply)

What the FUCK has that got to do with you?!
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 9:16, Reply)

There is a bunch of London wankers crying about hand hygiene and office cleanliness, swiftly followed by a report about the possible use of chemical weapons in Syria.
Utter, UTTER spastics!
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 9:32, Reply)

Why would we need to hear about chemical weapons in Syria or anything like that when there's a crisis of slightly dirty hands in our own capital?
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 9:38, Reply)

Ah ha ha!!! What have you done with the real Pissflaps?
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 11:38, Reply)

That cook the dough as he's pulling it through his hand. NEXT !
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 9:06, Reply)

there are some weird post production camera shifts and stuff (the zoom in when they notice the reflection on the table might give something away)
Problem is in this day and age it's just too easy to edit it in After Effects you can only be properly impressed with their slight of hand if you are there to watch it yourself
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 9:15, Reply)

I assumed the croissant was sleight of hand done properly, due to how crushed it appeared to be, and the subtle massaging he had to do to get it back to croissant shape. The bread on the other hand was quite clearly edited.
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 9:18, Reply)

it's not that surprising, just disappointing
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 9:23, Reply)

magicians have been using (and indeed, inventing) editing tricks since 1896
Anywho, the croissant trick can be done fairly straightforwardly live as he appears to have a lot of space for a topit, and the angles look workable.
The baguette however, I'm not convinced by at all as the handling just doesn't look like something which could work live - especially with the punters sat on the sides. The only way you could load at that angle, with that much clearance would be *incredibly* obvious from anywhere other than the camera position.
There's just too much negative space around the load area, and the production angle is too steep for it to be anything other than an edit.
Pity, because the other effects were nice enough, and would easily work live.
</retired closeup magician blog>
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 10:12, Reply)

*raises eyebrow*
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 12:46, Reply)

The rubber band trick is so slowly done that it becomes clear how he's doing it. His hands repeatedly go out of frame during the phone trick, and there's also a convenient reflection at the first reveal, followed by some dodgy focussing at the change.
That baguette trick is really badly done though. If it's not edited in post, then he should try to make it look like it wasn't.
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 10:37, Reply)

Bring back the guy with the cup and the balls from yesterday.
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 11:29, Reply)

He keeps blowing on stuff.
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 10:03, Reply)

I have a talent for seeing through bad acting. And, yeah,^ the music can sod off as well.
( , Sun 9 Dec 2012, 12:16, Reply)