
Watching the old man swing home from the pub and start arguing with Newsnight can be either funny, slightly unnerving or just plain terrifying. Tell us about daft things parents have done while they've been in their cups.
Suggested by NotDavidBailey, voted for by YOU
( , Thu 24 Feb 2011, 17:58)
« Go Back

Most of the time my parents are fairly tame when drunk - maybe their jokes get slightly cruder, and double entendres tend to slip towards single entendres. About the worst that happens is my mum's wine allergy kicks in and she ends up being almost able to cook a fry-up on her face. However, there's a few times when it goes that little bit too far, and there's one particular incident that always springs to mind.
I must have been about 8 or 9 at the time, so I can't remember all that much. I remember my dad going out for a drink with a couple of workmates (including an uncle), and then he was in hospital for a few weeks with pneumonia. I can remember going to visit him every now and then, but whenever mum brought me and my sister along there was always a very slightly tense air between her and dad. "Fair enough" says I, "maybe she was just worried about him".
It wasn't until later that I found out exactly *how* he ended up in hospital - something my uncle was only too happy to inform us of. Y'see, it turns out that after closing time, my dad felt like enjoying the company of my mum. But, given that she was all the way back home, he'd decided to settle on the next best thing that looked vaguely similar - a postbox.
(For the record, yes my mum is about the same build and complexion, especially after the wine, but still - easy to see why she was so pissed at him)
Luckily he passed out before he was able to do anything more than hug it while bawling my mum's name, but not quite so luckily my uncle was too twatted to do anything more than leave him on the pavement for the night - hence the pneumonia, and eventually losing a lung.
My dad's no longer allowed out on the piss.
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 11:26, 94 replies)

I'm pretty sure this kind of thing must actually happen to some of us.
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 12:32, closed)

..unless the OP's dad had TB in the 1940's due to the only available treatment being of remove the afflicted lung, or, on his admission to hospital was found to have had SERIOUS lung cancer(which would have manifested symptoms so severe as to render going out on the piss impossible) I'm going to officially class this story as Medical Horseshit.
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 12:37, closed)

( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 12:38, closed)

( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 12:40, closed)

To be fair Badger, I wasn't taking notes at the time. I do know he had a lung out around that time after constantly coming down with pneumonia - could have been a secondary infection. It's not exactly something that gets brought up, mostly as dad starts looking sheepish and mum somewhat bloody furious a decade or so on.
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 13:36, closed)

So, I'm calling 'medical horseshit' here.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 9:42, closed)

health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/pneumonia/surgery.html
But thanks for your diagnosis of "horseshit" all the same. Your qualifications are...?
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 13:42, closed)

Just because he's too tiny and effeminate to be a real doctor and had to become a nurse instead.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 13:58, closed)

( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:02, closed)

'Severe cases' being defined as 'not having picked up a chest infection after a night on the piss'.
People who need lobectomies(removal of part of the lung) or pneumonectomie(removal of the whole of the lung)generally aren't able to be out on the piss, raping postboxes, given that they're pretty much housebound with severe long term lung complaints.
Which aren't brought on by fucking postboxes.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:00, closed)

Just because you're too tiny and effeminate to be a real doctor and had to become a nurse instead.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:11, closed)

Because since records began, no-one has ever died of pneumonia after being left outside all night, let alone had any complications that might have required a lobectomy.
You are obviously wasted in your current profession. May I suggest you retrain as an all-seeing oracle?
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:12, closed)

Let me fetch the paddling pool and tapioca.
OK.
Now you can fight properly.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:19, closed)

Eh, it doesn't matter. Cancel the paddling pool and the tapioca, just get me a barrel, some fish and a gun.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:27, closed)

I'm utterly wasted at Kwik Fit.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:26, closed)

I wish I'd taken a screenshot now.
Anyway, I only have one of the largest biomedicinal libraries in Europe at my disposal, which informs me that never, in the course of human history has a thoacotomy/lobectomy been used to treat a patient with pneumonia. On that note, I shall change my sig to something unequivocally mocking the OP and make myself feel like a big man into the bargain.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:48, closed)

and now you're trying to retcon the whole thing?
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:53, closed)

Now go and watch some more Stewart Lee videos and see if that re-acquaints you with the notion of sarcasm.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:55, closed)

( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:56, closed)

More likely with last week's question though. Nothing a good soak and a 40 degree wash couldn't remove.
( , Thu 3 Mar 2011, 10:02, closed)

Given that, y'know, it's not.
But well played for googling something vaguely associated with the initial diagnosis and prognosis of disease but not really a guide for treatment.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:54, closed)

but to say that there's never been a case of pneumonia that has required surgery is, to borrow a phrase, "medical horseshit".
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:59, closed)

There is pretty much no benefit to removing a lung surgically as you can return some, if not all the function of the lung on treatment.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 15:01, closed)

I swear it changes every time I press F5
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 15:14, closed)

It's the internet equivalent of taking down shorthand and then writing it up longhand.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 15:27, closed)

And you're absolutely sure, 100%, that the OP's dad had no additional complications or conditions that might have required a thoracotomy/lobectomy?
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 15:48, closed)

Otherwise, unlikely.
Unless hey'd found a massive cancer.
In which case he'd have been too ill to go out on the piss.
Hence, horseshit.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 15:59, closed)

Thoracotomy is used to treat "unresolved" pneumonia where the symptoms do not respond to treatment after a couple of weeks, or in cases where the pneumonia coincides with an abcess or empyema - either of which could have developed after the initial diagnosis of pneumonia and would require surgery to treat. Given that the OP already posted "I do know he had a lung out around that time after constantly coming down with pneumonia - could have been a secondary infection" it seems perfectly reasonable that his dad was admitted with pneumonia and had a lobectomy due to subsequent complications. The following timeline:
1) Goes out on piss, tries to fuck postbox
2) Comes down with pneumonia, admitted to hospital
3) Pneumonia doesn't react to treatment, empyema discovered
4) Thoracotomy/lobectomy to treat empyema
...it's not beyond the realms of possibility, is it?
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 16:14, closed)

but that is a different kettle of fish, than it being the pnuemonia given by a cold night out on the piss that actually caused it. It just seems unlikely the pnuemonia had anything to do with it, regardless of how many cases he had. Also an abscess is not exactly the 'secondary condition' in this scenario.
Out of interest your 'biomedical library' is definitely jstor isn't it?
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 18:34, closed)

...though I appreciate that since the Badger thought of a new section for his archive, he needs to fill it somehow.
An abcess or empyema, either pre-existing or developed after the initial hospitalisation for pneumonia would account for everything given here - the OP themself admitted that they didn't know all the details of the case - but LOL their lung fell out ROLF
No, it's not jstor.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 22:50, closed)

I thought you were just pretending to argue to make a point?
If you're being genuinely pedantic then you need more than a barrel of booze.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 15:02, closed)

( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 15:05, closed)

and watching Badger frantically re-edit his replies is entertainment enough
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 15:17, closed)

I mean ... it's an outdoors activity so it instantly elevated him above 90% of the grey-faced flabby shut-ins on /talk.
Even if it isn't a real sport.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 16:02, closed)

hang on - whose side are you on, here?
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 16:17, closed)

It just seemed an odd target for a group that features so many people whose greatest exercise is unsticking themselves from the sofa when their butterkist runs out.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 16:29, closed)

oh! here come the /talk bullies! they only hate this story because it's too clever for them and anyway, they have no sense of humour and no lives and and and and!
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 12:46, closed)

( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 12:51, closed)

or assassins. i've even got one who's an alcoholic assassin stripper but i don't like to talk about it as some awful things happened and it makes my tummy hurt if i think about them.
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 13:00, closed)

i feel so much better just for sharing my pain on an anonymous comedy website. don't go changin'.
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 13:30, closed)

Here comes the cavalry!
Right ... shall we talk about breakfast? I had some home-made jésuites because I am a ponce.
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 13:14, closed)

i'm so sorry. we all appear to have got completely the wrong end of the stick, here. just wait a moment and i'll be back with some porn featuring worryingly young looking girls fellating arthropods.
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 13:34, closed)

it's terrible. not funny, not well written and absolutely trying to pass off shite as humorous truth.
fill your boots!
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:25, closed)

GOD, can't you just THINK before you post?
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 13:18, closed)

and that's why I don't have any kidneys
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 13:19, closed)

with 10 million turkish lira in the sink?
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 13:22, closed)

Lick an envelope, lose an eye, minimum.
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 13:23, closed)

That you can definately pull some humour from someone trying to shag a post box whilst drunk and howling out his wifes name....Some people may walk past a scene like that thinking it's disgusting but I would just laugh my arse off!! Really not a bad post at all imo. Just as well the lung falling out wasn't the comedy bit here but how do we prove the OP's dad really tried to hump a post box?!?!?!? I guess i'm missing the point here...
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 14:40, closed)

nobody is ever really going to think it IS their partner, not a postbox. Nor do you lose vital organs as a result. Unless you catch your cock in the slot...
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:27, closed)

Only aspire to getting my cock trapped in one of those...
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 15:34, closed)

And as for fucking parking meters, I've licked one out but that's only because I thought it was my GF....I wazh dirunk you see...
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 16:02, closed)

honesty Badger I would be a bit worried if I'd shat out someone else's ;)
( , Tue 1 Mar 2011, 17:50, closed)

lamp-posts are more my thing.
I wonder if there's a street furniture fetish site?
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 8:00, closed)

Lamp-posts are the supermodels of the street funiture fetish scene.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 10:48, closed)

and the next day all my internal organs dropped out of my arse.
Or not.
( , Wed 2 Mar 2011, 14:12, closed)
« Go Back