![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Overheard the other day: "I've told you before - stop swearing in front of the kids, for fuck's sake." Your tales of double standards please.
( , Thu 19 Feb 2009, 12:21)
« Go Back
![This is a QotW answer](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Outside of Japan, anyway.
Conventional weapons have killed so many more people it's barely funny. Look at Vietnam- there were horrific things done to that country that caused vastly more suffering than nuking them would. Cars are doing pretty well compared to nukes, too. So are mosquitos.
Can you name one person you knew who was killed by a nuke? No? How about someone who was shot / hit by a car / killed by a mosquito?
What we need next is an incredibly powerful bomb that wipes out every living thing within a certain radius then just stops- no fallout. That way it'd be quick and relatively painless and of far more military value than a nuke. Plus we'd have a reason to discourage other countries from using nukes!
( , Fri 20 Feb 2009, 15:22, 14 replies)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Kills everyone within a 5 mile radius without damaging any buildings, created by an architect with no mates.
( , Fri 20 Feb 2009, 15:49, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
it's still a bomb- and the bigger ones are kiloton-sized. So they'll do a lot of damage over a short range.
I guess it's better, though.
The only way I can think of achieving something like this would be to have a dirty great killer-satellite blast an area with vast doses of gamma radiation / plasma / etc. Something that'll kill properly.
There was an idea a while ago of dropping steel rods from space- they'd accellerate to speeds that would let them rip through buildings and armoured vehicles.
Pretty much I'm not a fan of hurting people, but recognise that wars are something of a neccesary evil. So we might as well get building more effective killing machines rather than crap like land mines that are designed to incapacitate the enemy.
( , Fri 20 Feb 2009, 16:09, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
"There was an idea a while ago of dropping steel rods from space"
betcha when they 'dropped them' from space they all just floated away in different directions. Space has a very floaty feel to it you know...
( , Sat 21 Feb 2009, 0:03, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Doesn't just stop where the atmosphere does. That's why satellites work.
( , Tue 24 Feb 2009, 11:24, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Wars fought to stop them, etc, whatever?
( , Fri 20 Feb 2009, 16:07, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and they're used as a cheap excuse to invade in some other conflicts.
It's still almost cetainly responsible for fewer deaths than the AK-47.
( , Fri 20 Feb 2009, 16:17, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
... then they'd drop them everywhere they could, whenever they liked, on whomever they chose.
Well, after all, they're "painless" bombs, aren't they. No reason not to use them.
( , Fri 20 Feb 2009, 16:23, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
You are quite right though more people die every year from fork lift truck accidents than radiation poisoning (Even including chernobyl). A neutron bomb will cause a lot of damage over a fairly small area but will fatally irradiate a much larger area. BTW dying from radiation poisoning is not pretty it makes cancer look like the easy way out.
( , Fri 20 Feb 2009, 16:36, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
But I *do* know someone who was killed by a speeding bullet shot from a car driven by mosquitos, if that counts?
One day, I will avenge him.
( , Tue 24 Feb 2009, 5:49, closed)
« Go Back