b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1204447 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

That's the Laurentian Abyss.
You really aren't very good with these film references, are you?
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:17, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
Transformers hardly even qualifies as a film
More an epilectic fit of school boy robot fantasies.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:23, Reply)
You are a poor quality Monty AICMFP

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:24, Reply)
That would make me a fucking gold plated AA

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:27, Reply)
Ooof

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:34, Reply)
I don't attempt to reference things I have no clue about, as I know it makes me look ridiculous.
Ergo, I'm already doing better than you.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:34, Reply)
and I don't see that having an encyclopedic knowledge of a children's film is agood thing...
By the way, this isn't a competition, it's a forum.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:40, Reply)
And yet you're still managing to lose.

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:46, Reply)
Ha ha!

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:47, Reply)
You sound like Wormulous
oh dear
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:48, Reply)
You're on the internet, dear
we've already all lost.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:49, Reply)
I've watched ten minutes of one of those films in Currys once, I'm confident that allows me to reference it as a fucking piece of bubblegum shit
Are you expecting forum users to have an MA in Transformers before being allowed to comment on how banal it is?
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:50, Reply)
You say that like it's bad thing

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:25, Reply)
I'd watch it just for slow motion Megan Fox
Films like that are a like a quick wank, initially satisfying but they leave you feeling a little empty and sordid.

/Claudia Winkleman
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:30, Reply)
Ironically, I consider Claudia Winkleman to be worthy of a quick wank
A longer, more deliberate one would see my mind wander onto other, more attractive TV presenters, however.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:32, Reply)
She is filth
I bet she takes it in the tradesmans
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:35, Reply)
She's not as filth as Kirsty Allsop.
Claudia puts on a filthy act, but when you actually started smacking her around the face with it and trying to get five fingers up her, she'd get all upset.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:37, Reply)
I bet she's surprisingly prudish and uptight IRL
Alexa Chung, now there's a girl who could indulge anyone's filthy perversity. Except Kroney, as she obviously never eats anything.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:39, Reply)
Looks like a corpse
More a LiC kind of girl
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:41, Reply)
That Clare Balding, phwoar
I bet she loves a hot meat injection on a Friday night
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:44, Reply)
Clare Balding has bigger balls than you

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:44, Reply)
she might go for a lukewarm plastic injection.
She's fairly famously not into "the meat"
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:45, Reply)
She likes a kebab

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:47, Reply)
ah, does she now?

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:48, Reply)
Allsop is a definite 'dorty bord'.

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:40, Reply)
I bet her clopper matches TGBs

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:41, Reply)
mind like a Welsh railway.

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:44, Reply)
Going nowhere?
Up the valley?
A risk of a racially motivated beating?
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:45, Reply)
one track and dirty.

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:46, Reply)
but, yeah. Also all of the above.

(, Tue 17 May 2011, 9:46, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1