b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1358073 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Basically that it lets you concentrate all your energy on your vocation.
I'm not saying I believe these things per se, but it was interesting to see the viewpoint put intelligently.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:37, 3 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
but that's retarded, i am perfectly capable to living my life without sex getting in the way at all...not like that
the idea that sex is a problem is ridiculous. An analogy for you, the only people obsessed with food are the obese and the anorexic, everyone else gets along just fine...
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:40, Reply)
I think it's more the relationship side of life than the sex and one usually comes with the other.
No pun intended.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:42, Reply)
again, most of the worlds population, aprt from the internet LOLZ, can manage this
is capable of doing both, these people are obviously soft in the head and the trousers
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:44, Reply)
Not to the extreme that the religious orders live.
Relationships don't hinder our lives only when they are going right.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:46, Reply)
they can't wank
everyone else can cope with not getting laid if they have a decent vibrator.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:48, Reply)
Speak for your self.

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:50, Reply)
you know i'm right
there is a difference between a temporary diet of manual orgasms only and a rigidly enforced diet of no orgasms.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:53, Reply)
well yes
I was just doubting your statement that having a good vibro makes not getting any OK. Partly because not all of us use vibrators and partly, coz it's still not much of a substitute, abstinence is worse to=hough, agree on that.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:57, Reply)
I didn't say I agreed with it, nor have I articulated it well.
it just happened to be well put, such that I can believe that others might sincerely believe it.

On the eating analogy, I reckon I could gen more done if I wasn't wasting time cooking, eating, buying food and being out pof sorts due to low blood sugar. This is not a good reason to want to give up eating, assuming it were biologically possible) but there are days I could do with out it.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:45, Reply)
I don't understand this at all
because surely someone who is getting some every night is far less distracted than someone who needs to change their sheets every time they accidentlly watch Channel 5.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:41, Reply)
Technically it's only being unmarried
which I suppose is to avoid favouritism. Said priest could be shagging anyone and everyone.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:42, Reply)
fairly sure cafflicks have views on sex outside of marriage.

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 13:55, Reply)
Yes: "It's OK as long as it's with the altar boy".

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:05, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1