Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I;m on holiday, about to go walking along some Yorkshire cliff tops, so nothing can annoy me today.
But the fact that Einstein may have been wrong puzzles me:
www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/22/faster-than-light-particles-neutrinos
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:32, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
todmorden is in lancashire
as we tell my father repeatedly
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:47, Reply)
Also this is worth bearing in mind www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI7o-FJM8f4
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:39, Reply)
"which could mean fundamental things like E=MC2 could be wrong"
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:41, Reply)
I was discussing it with a colleague on the way in this morning. Granted, neither of us specialise in theoretical physics, but the best we could come up with is "maybe the currently quoted speed of light is actually very slightly wrong?"
Even the bloke who did the work is adamant it must be wrong, he just can't work out how.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:43, Reply)
before being allowed to report on it.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:45, Reply)
(I used to do this epsrc NOISEmaker thing) and explained this. They payed very little attention. Unsurprisingly.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:47, Reply)
Well, that and the fact that I absolutely do not give a shit
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:52, Reply)
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:53, Reply)
Especially since it was only my Physics teacher, Mr "Loves the jism" Chisholm, who enforced it. My female Biology teacher had no truck with such practical methods of explanation.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:58, Reply)
Mainly because I don't understand any of it.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:41, Reply)
It would be incredibly shocking if he was, but it just got me imagining what the implications would be if this were true,
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:42, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread