b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1364427 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Nothing
I;m on holiday, about to go walking along some Yorkshire cliff tops, so nothing can annoy me today.


But the fact that Einstein may have been wrong puzzles me:

www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/22/faster-than-light-particles-neutrinos
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:32, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
Where in Yorkshire?

(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:35, Reply)
Skipsea
near Bridlington.

I've never been to Yorkshire before.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:36, Reply)
Ooo! lovely.
Quite a way from me though.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:37, Reply)
well, yes
todmorden is in lancashire

as we tell my father repeatedly
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:47, Reply)
It's in Yorkshire now.

(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:49, Reply)
Brid is nice
My brother-in-law lives there
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:38, Reply)
I like Yorkshire
Also this is worth bearing in mind www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI7o-FJM8f4
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:39, Reply)
It's pretty likely he wasn't wrong.
xkcd.com/955/
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:38, Reply)
That spastic cunt on BBC breakfast announced the headline and followed it up with the gem
"which could mean fundamental things like E=MC2 could be wrong"
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:41, Reply)
haha, fuck.
I was discussing it with a colleague on the way in this morning. Granted, neither of us specialise in theoretical physics, but the best we could come up with is "maybe the currently quoted speed of light is actually very slightly wrong?"

Even the bloke who did the work is adamant it must be wrong, he just can't work out how.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:43, Reply)
I just wish that people were forced to have a basic understanding of science
before being allowed to report on it.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:45, Reply)
I've sat in several meetings with BBC and C4 programming people
(I used to do this epsrc NOISEmaker thing) and explained this. They payed very little attention. Unsurprisingly.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:47, Reply)
This is exactly why I have nothing to say on the matter
Well, that and the fact that I absolutely do not give a shit
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:52, Reply)

absolutely do not give a shit spent all my time in science class learning how to insert lubricated penises into my bottom.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:53, Reply)
I was slightly confused as to that part of the curriculum I must admit
Especially since it was only my Physics teacher, Mr "Loves the jism" Chisholm, who enforced it. My female Biology teacher had no truck with such practical methods of explanation.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:58, Reply)
Nothing surprises me in the world of science.
Mainly because I don't understand any of it.
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:41, Reply)
Oh I know
It would be incredibly shocking if he was, but it just got me imagining what the implications would be if this were true,
(, Fri 23 Sep 2011, 9:42, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1