Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
it's the police lines that look to be tricky.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:19, Reply)
Even drunk as you were you may have noticed I look more punk than hippy.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:35, Reply)
they all need a bath
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:29, Reply)
They are non-taxpayers protesting about how little taxpayer money they receive. To get their bullshit degree.
IT'S ONLY RIGHT!
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:32, Reply)
merit-based, with a weighting for those who went to comps.
get 3 A's and want to be a doctor? here's your fees.
get 3 D's and want to study surfing at the uni of plymouth? er...
i am exaggerating, but there is a very obvious point.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:37, Reply)
just because it was free for predecessors does not make it your right.
you want it, you pay for it. can't pay for it? then you simply can't go, until you can pay for it. yes that sucks hard, but that's life. lots of things about it suck.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:42, Reply)
They should have had the good sense to be born into a wealthy family.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:45, Reply)
It's a harsh assessment of the current options.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:57, Reply)
as it happens. family wealth or lack of had nothing to do with it. brains and hard work definitely did.
but that's not really relevant here. the sad truth is, there are lots of things you can't do if you can't afford them. private healthcare. houses. cars. designer clothes. holidays. now a degree is miles more important than any of these, but unfortunately, when there are as many students in the country as there are, they can't all have it for free. someone has to pay for it, OR difficult choices have to be made about who should get it for free.
yes it fucking sucks giant balls if you want to go and you can't afford it. not denying that. but lots of things in life are really hard and suck. life is fucking hard and it sucks. why does anyone see it as their RIGHT to have their fees paid?
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:59, Reply)
I make no comment on your personal circumstances. I don't know you, but as a lawyer you must be clever and you sound as though you have done alright for yourself.
I agree there is too much that people expect for nothing these days, I imagine this is a logical conclusion of a consumerist, capitalist society that keeps the poor poor - eventually they will kick up and demand nice things, even though they haven't worked to achieve them.
And finally, why does anyone see free education as their right?
Because we have a long history of free education.
Because the people who are taking it away had one.
Because their predecessors who began this sorry business claimed a mantra of "Education, education, education"
Because it is well-established that the better your education the better quality of life you can expect to have.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:11, Reply)
but I am trying to look like I am working at the same time, and having to deal with constant interuptions.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:12, Reply)
is not an argument. there are many more people in the country now, for a start. and the economy simply can't support it: look at the number of graduates who are unemployed.
this goes back to my previous argument: make it merit-based. if you get good grades and you are doing a good subject at a good university, it should be free. otherwise not.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:17, Reply)
Will your merit based system allow for positive discrimination for those from poorer backgrounds or who go to shit schools, who are less likely to get the good grades than their more affluent counterparts, even if they are brighter?
Also, our education system is broken all the way down to the start - "good" secondary schools nowadays tend to train children to pass the curriculum, rather than give them a grounding in education.
Research shows that the majority of education funding should be put into early years if you are ever going to lift children out of poverty. That was one really good thing that the previous administration were doing, when they weren't out waging wars.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:26, Reply)
is if they don't get the support at home, it is wasted energy. somehow the parents need to be made to give more of a fuck.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:30, Reply)
Then they stand a much better chance, regardless of how shit their parents are.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:32, Reply)
she likes to play the corporate bitch, Stunned on the other hand....
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:00, Reply)
it's factual. i am not saying wealthy kids deserve an education but screw the rest. i am saying, life is fucking unfair, but if you can't pay for it, you're not entitled to it as of right.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:02, Reply)
Them's the breaks.
And that is bollocks because they will lend you the money. You may owe a fortune when you finish but that, for me, will encourage people out of hotel management degrees.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:56, Reply)
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:57, Reply)
But that is the sort of shit that should be vocational. Taxpayers, in times of austeriity, should not be paying for a Beatles degree from John Moores University.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:01, Reply)
People on b3ta often rail against the pure nonsense spouted in the Daily Mail, yet people still come out with tosh like this.
Of course tax-payers should not fund filthy scousers doing a Beatles degree at John Moores and thankfully, they don't.
Silly Stunned.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:15, Reply)
www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/27/us-beatles-degree-odd-idUSTRE70Q60920110127
In your face!
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:26, Reply)
When you show me evidence of UK tax-payers funding such studies I will (un)happily eat my words and apologise.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:31, Reply)
Even the clever ones aren't going to easily find jobs nowadays.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:58, Reply)
and yet more and more of our logistics and manufacturing goes abroad.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:00, Reply)
We have a couple of useless nitwits here but we daren't get rid of them in case we can't find replacements.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:02, Reply)
But again, you CAN go to Uni. You will just owe a shitload of money when you are finished.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:04, Reply)
There are kids going in to uni regardless of the debt. And let's face it we never thought that far ahead at that age. These are kids who would rather work or would be more suited to working instead of trying to get a degree they don't really care that much about.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:06, Reply)
We should be training more plumbers, engineers etc, rather than art historians.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:21, Reply)
On the guardian website is some beeny hatted student waving a banner about the right to a free education. Silly little girl.
*rages*
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:47, Reply)
Higher education is a privilege, not a right. Not everyone can expect to go on and do a 'do you want fries with that' degree and expect the taxpayer to pay for it.
Money is tight, and difficult decisions have to be made. I'd rather that schools and hospitals were well equipped rather than loads of middle-class fuckwits learn about the History of Art at my expense.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:05, Reply)
But there was little choice. It had to be done or the whole infrastructure would collapse.
They have been very short sighted in paying bonuses again so soon.
That said, if you worked for RBS in Dartford, say, you stand a good chance of having been made redundant. Not all banking is investment banking.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:09, Reply)
Investment banking makes up a relatively small percentage of banking staff in the UK, but it's the larger group that have taken the hit in terms of job losses.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:11, Reply)
is the mass idiocy behind them. The government makes a decision, you and your mates don't like it, so you organise a march, or to duff up the windows at Footlocker. Presumably the hope is that David Cameron shits himself at this and changes the decision you and your mates don't like. And then what? There are plenty of other governmental decisions being made that people don't like, and if one gets reversed because of rioting, it will only encourage more riots.
I thought university students were meant to be clever?
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 15:05, Reply)
Well, I got a fees only grant and some student loans, so not totally free anyway.
(, Wed 9 Nov 2011, 14:38, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread