Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:03, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
I'm special because I understood a film quote. Can I join the cool kids club now?
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:04, Reply)
But I'm less happy about his plan to do a sequal to Blade Runner.
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:08, Reply)
He could do three shit prequels, re-tweak the original film six times, then release a 3-D version of the worst one of the lot.
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:12, Reply)
I must take umbrage with the suggestion that Revenge of the Sith is shit
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:18, Reply)
Phantom Menace - Shit.
Attack of the Clones - A bit less shit than the last one.
Revenge of the Sith - Less shit than the last one, mainly because it hasn't got Jar Jar "Mesa fucking annoying cunt" Binks in it.
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:21, Reply)
Phantom Menace is the only one of the prequels that isn't total wank. The other two have a petulant prick teenager as the star.
And Jar Jar Binks is the only decent character in any of them. You're an idiot.
No offence. Opinions and that.
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:27, Reply)
My child thinks Jar Jar Binks is hilarious.
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:30, Reply)
Point taken about Hayden Christensen though. Although Jake Lloyd wasn't exactly lacking in the "Oh God, somebody punch him" stakes, either.
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:32, Reply)
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:33, Reply)
Why is George Lucas such a twat? Anyone with eyes can see that he can't act.
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:28, Reply)
Oh fuck. Off. If ever there was a film that stood alone perfectly well without needing a sequel... it's probably Lawrence of Arabia, but you get the idea
(, Tue 7 Feb 2012, 9:13, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread