They're generally angry bitter people who don't believe that a country has to protect it's citizens.

(PsychoChomp, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:53, 4 replies, latest was 14 years ago)

Nothing wrong with protecting the weak and vulnerable.
Dole scum job-avoiding workshy cunts who are perfectly able to get and keep a job are not weak and or vulnerable. They are lazy and should not be supported by the state.
( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:57, Reply)

What about their children?

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:58, Reply)

Feckless.

(Set your faces to Stunned Bigly, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:59, Reply)

So are they born lazy? Or are they taught to be lazy?

(PsychoChomp, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:59, Reply)

Both.
With those parents as role models.
(Set your faces to Stunned Bigly, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:59, Reply)

The whole 'nature versus nuture' debate is much broader than this.
TBH, I can't be arsed to begin discussing that.
( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:03, Reply)

Or do they have laziness thrust upon them?

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:06, Reply)

Or shot
I'm voting option B
( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:59, Reply)

Not so
they/we just think that if you are getting something for free that you don't have the right to bitch about where you get it.
( Peej, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:58, Reply)

^ This ^

( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:02, Reply)

I don't want them living near me. They make the place look untidy.
Send them Up North where they can spruce the place up and teach the denizens how to use a knife and fork. An shit indoors.
(Set your faces to Stunned Bigly, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:05, Reply)

I wouldn't protect any fucker that doesn't know where apostrophes go.

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:04, Reply)

THATS THE JOKE

( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:07, Reply)

Nice to see you have finally adopted this's spelling.

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:14, Reply)

urrrrgh
people who don't get apostrophes really annoy me. it's soooooo simple.

abbreviation or possessive? it gets an apostrophe. plural? it doesn't. the only two exceptions you need in every day life are "its" and "it's" and "who's" and "whose". THAT'S IT! THAT REALLY IS IT! THAT'S THE GOLDEN RULE YOU MORON.

when i am queen, i will burn every shop selling "fish and chip's".
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:22, Reply)

Chip's what?

( Agnostic Antichrist Baltimora, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:24, Reply)

Can you also destroy all people who mix up "was" and "were" in speech?

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:25, Reply)

First up against the wall
"were not were"
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:26, Reply)

don't "shake your head" at that

( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:32, Reply)

As well as "have" and "of".

(Set your faces to Stunned Bigly, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:28, Reply)

oh god
"well, i was sat over there"...

shudder.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:30, Reply)

isn't the fundamental problem there "sat" not "sitting" ?

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:32, Reply)

either "i sat" or "i was sitting" would be fine
"i was sat" implies someone picked you up and forcibly parked your arse.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)

and no
the fundamental problem is, if you say that, you are a colossal fuckwit
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)

I was not disputing that for a second, my dear.

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:47, Reply)

Can we welcome you to The Cause Mr. Chomp?

( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:06, Reply)