
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

so sunday/monday morning, during another pointless drunken argument with the ex. he's the only person i argue with; otherwise it's pretty much impossible to fall out with me.
alt: i was amazed to learn that most germans rent rather than buying their homes. who here owns/rents?
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 13:52, 4 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

I'll pop out to Sainsburies and get you some more boxes
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 13:54, Reply)

Buying is a british thing and the rental market isn't as regulated as in Europe.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 13:53, Reply)

i guess it is dead money when you think about it. you've been paying off someone else's mortgage for years.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 13:54, Reply)

And you can do things to places you are renting and stuff.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 13:55, Reply)

leasehold is a fucking cheek though
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 13:58, Reply)

the best way is to buy somewhere that has a share of freehold and hope your co-owners aren't cunts. my landlord is the queen, so everything is immaculate - but the cunting service charge is £10,000 a year.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 13:59, Reply)

£10k, what the fuck do you get back for that kind of money? how many flats are there?
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:00, Reply)

and gardeners etc. it's also one of those mansion blocks, so they're always doing something to it, to upgrade it. last year it was electric gates. this year it's sky tv for all the flats.
not sure how many flats. there's about 5 blocks in total, going down the street, and lizzie owns the lot.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:02, Reply)

i want to be able to demand blowjobs from the 24hr porter
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:06, Reply)

the one in my block is an alcoholic bald dude. you go for him. i don't mind.
the bulk of the money will be in lease extensions. eg mine was the thick end of £50k, and i had over 80 years left.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:07, Reply)

but the statute doesn't bind certain entities, and the crown is one of them. however, the crown has volunteered to abide by it where possible.
in my case, the crown wants all the flats on the same length leases. therefore they were only prepared to grant me another 57 years. i was happy with that, since it saved me a few more thousand on the full 90 years, but 137 years is plenty long enough to boost the value of the flat.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:18, Reply)

but let's say I'm looking at a flat and it currently has a lease of 90 years. So I buy it, pay off my mortgage, but then your saying that because it took me 25 years to do that and my lease is only for 65 years that my flat would now be worth less because of the shorter lease period, and to extend that lease I have to pay thousands of pounds more?
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:22, Reply)

And why can't you just buy the flat off them instead of leasing it?
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:26, Reply)

could be the people in the block collectively. could be the builder. could be the queen. could be an investor.
you can't own the freehold of a flat independently of the rest of the block. the structure, roof, common parts etc are owned by the landlord, who then leases the live-able bits.
what you CAN do is get together with the other residents and force the landlord to sell to you, provided enough people want to do it. then you can grant yourself a new 999 year lease at a peppercorn premium!
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:31, Reply)

Sounds like a massive con to me. Why can't leases be made really long, like 500 years or something?
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:32, Reply)

you can agree whatever you want. but you can only force the landlord into another 90. as a VERY rough rule of thumb, you only see short-term leases like these in london. the rest of the country tend to be on 999 year leases, or even 2,000 year leases, so of course it's academic.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:33, Reply)

you are renting, like any other tenancy, but on a longer term and at a low rent to reflect the fact that a premium was paid for the grant of the lease at the beginning.
i have a second floor flat. effectively i have the right to use the space between the floor and the ceiling for the next 137 years. except that the landlord made damn sure to demise the ceiling to me, since plaster is expensive!
it's a simplistic view. it gets factored into the purchase price, eg which is why share of freehold is more attractive. and for a second eg, ideally you will extend at about 85 years so that it's much cheaper.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:29, Reply)

since flats are all you can buy in central london, the prices of them aren't very attractive.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:31, Reply)

but there is no way to change it.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:32, Reply)

there is always a way to change it, there is simply no inclination to change it.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:33, Reply)

it gives me a lot of work though. landlord and tenant disputes are meat and drink to me.
dullest letter ever: "i act for your landlord. stop hanging your dirty sports socks out on the balcony. it breaches the nuisance clause in your lease."
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:37, Reply)

not a problem for you, but it will mean that you'll struggle to sell, as any purchaser wouldn't be able to get a mortgage on that. mind you, there are agencies that specialise in hooking up cash buyers with shorter term leases.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:06, Reply)

( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:07, Reply)

but it looks like being 25k odd to sort it: not something currently possible for me, as you'd imagine.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:07, Reply)

which feels criminal really
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:12, Reply)

that's kind of my plan. Assuming I can hang on here*, I will have no mortgage by my early 50s and will borrow the money to add 99 years or whatever then.
*BIG assumption
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:11, Reply)

( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:13, Reply)

at the very best.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:17, Reply)

( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:13, Reply)

or that tennis bird scratching her arse.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 15:16, Reply)

which is based on the market value of the flat. plus you have to pay the landlord's legal costs.
it does suck. the only thing is that it is usually reflected in the purchase price by the time you get below 80 years. eg i saw a stunning flat in south ken when i was looking; it was only £500k for a 3 bed top floor flat with a terrace. i sniffed a rat. a giant stinking sewer rat. sure enough, foxtons admitted sheepishly it had 7 years left on the term. valuer estimated cost of extending for another 90 years to be £1,500,000. so basically... a £2M flat.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:10, Reply)

..speak English woman.
What is this fucking lunacy?
Up here, you either buy a house and it's yours forever, or you rent. It's not fucking difficult.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:19, Reply)

I hope she carks it soon, for your sake.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:36, Reply)

rather a change from cash wealth to asset wealth, rent is just money being poured away.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 13:56, Reply)

would either have swung something amazing like a rent act tenancy, or have a severe case of denial. but maybe i've been brainwashed by the property ladder media.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:00, Reply)

( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:03, Reply)

i have some that i am dealing with at the moment, and it's a total bitch. eg i have one dude paying £400 a month for a 3 storey townhouse in notting hill. and it's hereditary, so when he carks it, a relative could stay for the next god knows how long.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:05, Reply)

then there would be an option, but the way it currently works you're a mug if you rent, but also, you probably won't ever be able to afford a mortgage of your own.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:05, Reply)

it meant that there was no money in being a landlord, so people either resorted to very dodgy tactics or didn't put any rental property on the market. i mean, why would you pay all that money on a mortgage, only to be stuck with a tenant's rent covering a fraction of it? there's no incentive.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:07, Reply)

but there must be a compromise available somehow or it wouldn't work in other countries. There aren't enough houses being built full stop, which is only increasing the pressure on prices.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:09, Reply)

Did you see that program outlining how small their rooms often are and how tiny the windows are to help meet engergy efficiency targets?
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:12, Reply)

And then you go round the corner to where they've built the housing association plots and it's even worse.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:15, Reply)

instead of relatively traditional bricks and mortar, 2 up 2 down etc etc
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:19, Reply)

( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:22, Reply)

They are cheap and strong and can easily be made insulated to give you a toasty warm home.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:25, Reply)

( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:32, Reply)

I'm guessing you are a surveyor of some sort
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:27, Reply)

when i was 18, i bought a 1 bed flat in didsbury as an investment. i paid £42,000 and the mortgage was about £312 a month. my rental income was £560. profit.
5 years later, i sold it to pay for my law degree. i sold it for £101,500. marvellous for me. but priced it totally out of the rental market for anyone who needed a mortgage, as the rents had stayed totally static.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:12, Reply)

is now back up for rent at 40% higher than it was when I rented it.
In the meantime my monthly mortgage repayments, which started off about 12% lower than the rent I was paying have now dropped to less than half what it would cost to rent that house today.
I think buying was the right option for me.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:26, Reply)

From a house to a flat to a shared house.
I'm doing it wrong.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:42, Reply)

for a while, anyway.
More flexible, innit.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 14:03, Reply)

I shall be looking for a 3 bedroom flat with a terrace in Kensington with that, obviously.
( , Fri 11 May 2012, 15:20, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread