b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1753802 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Psychochomp is correct, this is an appalling development.
Not least because it is not a large step from this to people being silenced for saying stuff that corporations/governments/people don't like and it's not a large step from *that* to proper thought crime stuff.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 10:57, 4 replies, latest was 13 years ago)
it isn't really though.
there isn't some conspiracy by "the man" or shadowy x-files type shite going on.
chompy is paranoid because he likes to wank while wearing a maid's outfit and humming the theme tune to thomas and friends.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 10:59, Reply)
To be fair, that does sound like a lot of fun.

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:00, Reply)
*donald sutherland from invasion of the body snatchers*

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:01, Reply)


(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:06, Reply)
thanks lighty, can't post pics at work.

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:07, Reply)
I hope I can
or I'm in trouble.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:09, Reply)
That's from Don't Look Now ACTUALLY

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:12, Reply)
I always liked side 3 the bestest

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:15, Reply)
They're 2, they're 4, they're 6, they're 8
Shunting trucks and hauling freight
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:01, Reply)
he's never got to the final part.
pity, that's a nice piano solo.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:02, Reply)
No, there isn't any conspiracy theory and I know this sounds a bit tin-foil-hatty
but people get used to the current situation. Something changes that people thinks a bit off but nobody says anything. People start getting used to it being the usual method of operating and something else then happens that's a little worse. Rights aren't lost via conspiracies and Illuminati plots, they're lost via apathy and the old death by a thousand cuts business.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:01, Reply)
meh

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:03, Reply)
bullshit.
if people are apathetic then fuck the lot of us, deserve everything we fucking get.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:03, Reply)
Good chat.

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:04, Reply)
get bent

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:05, Reply)
The problem with slippery-slope arguments
is once you've used it you find yourself resorting to it more and more.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:10, Reply)
Very good.

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:11, Reply)
You could argue we're already at stage 2 of that
Ask the old bloke ejected from the Labour conference a couple of years ago.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:00, Reply)
Neil Kinnock?

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:00, Reply)
the thin end of the wedge argument, so verstaile it can be used in almost all situations
also bollocks as one step does not necessarily lead to another
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:04, Reply)
Somebody getting imprisoned
for saying something on his personal status is a violation of his freedom of speech regardless of whether you think he's a prick to say it. He is supposed to have the right to say whatever he wants. Other people don't have the right to silence you until it violates their own rights, which do *not* include the right to sit in a little bubble of approval and to never be offended by anything, ever.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:07, Reply)
not according to the social media act 2003
LEARN FACTS FUCKO
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:08, Reply)
It's a good job bad laws never get passed

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:14, Reply)
that's a purely objective argument.
fact is, we can't pass any laws that contravene the european act on human rights, this includes free speech.

jog on fucko.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:20, Reply)
This all began when you started intercepting bog trotter's emails and reading them

(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:09, Reply)
He only reads the fit ones' emails
Just in case they say something a bit saucy.
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:11, Reply)
lol
ur stopid, we don't have freedom of speech in the uk, it's never been a legal requirement
(, Wed 10 Oct 2012, 11:39, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1