Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
or are you going back to Uni?
/I've never filled them out. However, I can get to see and brutally judge about 5-600 a year as that's our usual number of first year applicants.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 13:42, 3 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
Unless you are applying for medicine or vet med, it doesn't make a blind bit of fucking difference what you write. We will judge you on your academic peformance.
Unless you are, of course, applying for a course where academic ability isn't important in which case STOP FUCKING RUINING HIGHER EDUCATION FOR THE PROPER STUDENTS.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 13:46, Reply)
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 13:53, Reply)
at least within reason.
The problem is more that you can do a degree in Chemistry from the University of Stoke, say. Which clearly isn't even going to get you a job adding chlorine to swimming pools.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:07, Reply)
Or, if there genuinely is a massive difference between degrees, the regulation of qualifications?
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:10, Reply)
as opposed to 3 A's, there's a reason for that
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:12, Reply)
The use of external examiners is supposed to ensure this. But the more universities, the more shitty courses, the more shitty external examiners available. Obviously, employers in a specialist science/engineering field are unlikely to take your degree in any way seriously if the external examiner moderating it is Bobby Buttfuck from Padstow Tech, but then prospective students, probably understandably, rarely check that.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 15:46, Reply)
this is why all decent science and engineering degrees are accredited by certain industry bodies.
Unlike a University of Stoke science degree.
There may not even be a University of Stoke. I don't know. The point is valid.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:12, Reply)
They appear to be accredited by Institute of Biomedical Science and the British Psychological Society, amongst others.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:20, Reply)
Now is it?
I never said all degrees from Stoke Poly were shit. Or, for that matter, that all degrees from a redbrick etc. were good. Just the point that "worthless degrees" are not decided purely by field, but by whether that particular course at that particular institution has any value or respect within said field.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 15:26, Reply)
EVEN THOUGH THE "UNIVERSITY" WAS FOUNDED IN 2003 AND I GOT STRAIGHT E'S IN MY A-LEVELS
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 13:53, Reply)
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 13:54, Reply)
Poor people would only waste it
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 13:57, Reply)
In their defence a few do work.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 13:59, Reply)
no, you fucktards.
It's an intellectual priviledge. If you hadn't all been so desperate to get your Bachelors in surfing studies, there would be enough money to fully fund student courses for, say, 10-20% of the population. You can't have it both ways
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 13:59, Reply)
However when I was at Uni (and I am sure you see a lot of this) there were so many people who were far to fucking stupid to be doing a degree. It was that universal push to have "education" that fucked up the benefits of apprentices etc.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:01, Reply)
My leftie principles remembers that there used to be other routes for people to take, tech colleges, apprenticeships, and rails against the loss of those.
But that's not the point with University funding, at least directly.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:03, Reply)
It is set on Auto Rankle that's all,
logic says universal higher education is a flawed system. Hence me mentioning the decline in apprenticeships etc.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:08, Reply)
although frankly anyone could get an a at a-level, they're hardly difficult. depending on what you score, you get a contribution to your fees. otherwise, if you want to go, you have to pay.
meanwhile employers should look closely at what is actually valuable. clue: it's not going to be fucking Chaucer for an hour a week for 3 years.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:09, Reply)
So suck my balls, narc.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:12, Reply)
It's a subject I've worked for 20 odd years in, on and off.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 13:52, Reply)
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 15:24, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread