
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

That the word "paedophile" when looked at linguistically makes no bloody sense? A lover of children... odd that.
( , Tue 28 Apr 2009, 17:44, 10 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

My dad's an english teacher, and he hates the fact that it basicaly means someone who loves childeren. I think that it's just due to the naming tradition for any paraphilia.
EDIT: For clarification, my Dad specialises on Eytomology, which is why he's pissed off with how it's named.
( , Tue 28 Apr 2009, 17:52, Reply)

Love emotionally - yes, that's fine. Even physical hugs, nice kisses are all dandy.
Love physically in teh sexy way - nooo. Maybe that's the type of love they're refering to but just didn't make the fact clear enough.
( , Tue 28 Apr 2009, 17:56, Reply)

In other contexts, say Bibliophile, or Angliophile the philia thing generaly refers to a non-sexual love. Wheras in paedophilia it refers to a sexual lust.
( , Tue 28 Apr 2009, 17:59, Reply)

there's only one explanation!
Whoever came up with the word is an idiot who didn't research the proper meanings of other languages *tuts*
Do you know of any other words that have incorrect meanings attached to them?
( , Tue 28 Apr 2009, 18:07, Reply)

Given that they usualy refer to sexual lust as opposed to love... I'm sure there are others.
( , Tue 28 Apr 2009, 18:15, Reply)

is nowhere near as interesting as it sounds.
( , Tue 28 Apr 2009, 18:24, Reply)

...seems more appropriate then?
Good job The Sunday Sport!
( , Tue 28 Apr 2009, 18:51, Reply)

But that is specifically someone who engages is sodomy with boys, I believe.
( , Tue 28 Apr 2009, 19:13, Reply)

has been banging on about this for years. It's a pet peeve of hers how it's misused constantly.
( , Wed 29 Apr 2009, 9:19, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »