Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
Number 112 in the periodic table. It is super heavy so what would you name it? I go for Bluewhalium.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:45, 54 replies, latest was 17 years ago)
whats up?
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:49, Reply)
that she's going to spend the whole bash punching me in the arm and running away.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:54, Reply)
It's too much entertainment to see their face screw up in pain.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:55, Reply)
Behind the pub.
My advice, and trust me on this one, is to clean your teeth that day.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:55, Reply)
It's always a pleasure to meet a fellow gentleman.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:58, Reply)
Saves me the bother of having to fix you up?
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 11:40, Reply)
by adding the "Widde" prefix to it.
(cf a piss-take in Private Eye some years ago where Ann went around canvassing Tory votes in a vehicle known as the "Widdiecopter.")
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:57, Reply)
As an aside, there used to be a band called "Osmium".
"Because it's the heaviest metal, lol!"
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:49, Reply)
But scientists are not yet sure that osmium is the heaviest metal, as it's a close run thing with iridium.
It's difficult to make a large enough and pure enough sample of each to measure their densities properly.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:53, Reply)
Thanks for that!
Isn't iridium used in pens and stuff?
Or is it a very low-percentage alloy?
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:54, Reply)
is used in pen nibs because it's so hard. But it's not necessarily very pure. It's also very expensive.
To do accurate measurements, you need something like 99.9999% purity, which is very difficult to achieve.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:56, Reply)
Hardness is not the same as strength. Or not the same thing as toughness...hang on a minute...
Oh, that's right - something can be hard, but not very strong, if, say, it's brittle. Iridium is probably used in pens because it keeps its edge, but is quite brittle.
I don't really know - try slashing someone's face with your pen and see how the nib fares...
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:59, Reply)
Incredibly well, in fact.
He's now in the back of an ambulance.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 11:03, Reply)
Well, an iridium-edged sword might be a fearsome weapon. But the iridium tipped pen will still be mightier.
...Still, it's obviously done the do on him - what state is your pen in?
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 11:47, Reply)
but I don't know about its brittleness, as Mr Crow said above. So it may lose its edge if you use it, just by chipping bits off. Also, it would be an extremely heavy and unwieldy sword.
A hardened steel sword with an iridium edge might be a good compromise.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 11:03, Reply)
in sunglasses lenses too for some reason
doesn't it only come from meteorites?
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 11:08, Reply)
"Behold, I write letters with the AWESOME POWER OF METEORITES! ROOOOAAAR!"
*scribble-scribble-scribble*
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 11:46, Reply)
but a lot of it does. There's an anomalously rich layer of it in the earth's crust, which has been found by geologists to coincide with the period when the dinosaurs were wiped out. This is consistent with a globally significant meteorite impact at that time.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 12:13, Reply)
What? I'm studying physics... these things always take a while to get named, it could happen...
EDIT: wait a sec, 112 was made in 1996... Its just that the results have only been confirmed now (putting it up for official naming).
Its also not the heaviest so far found, that goes to 118
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:51, Reply)
UnUnBium. from the latin numbers. How droll. Needs more imagination. 7\10.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:54, Reply)
My periodic table only goes up to 103!
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:57, Reply)
They're mostly ones that've been created in particle accelerators.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:59, Reply)
Even Lawrencium262 (103) decays rapidly, I'de hate to think what the half-life of anything bigger would be.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 11:01, Reply)
an island of stability at about 116, IIRC.
That is, nuclear physicists predict that element would not decay rapidly. May be wrong with the number though.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 11:11, Reply)
And while things there decal less rapidly than expected, the half lives are still in the second range (rather than the millisecond range predicted). Uub 285 has a half life of half a minute according to wiki, and thats the most stable by at least a factor of 10 after meinerium (109)
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 11:18, Reply)
There are enough silly names in the periodic table already so I'd keep it simple and just call it Alf.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 10:58, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »