b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 703670 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

what?
Gordon Brown is not a decent man. He is a flesh-waste. And as for Tories always screwing you, what has Labour done to us in the last few years? Messed us up royally. When history is written it will not deal kindly with Tony Blair and Gordon Brown
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 12:52, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Remember a vote for the Conservatives is a vote for Thatcher.
The tories will never change, it isn't in their interest to do so. Thatcher screwed the country and no-one will ever put that right now.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 12:56, Reply)
no offence
but that is ridiculous. A vote for the Conservatives is a vote for Thatcher? By that reasoning we should never vote for Labour again- a vote for Labour is a vote for Tony Blair. The Tories generally fix economic problems, and I like their manifesto especially in education. Labour are fuckers through and through.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 12:59, Reply)
It's not as ridiculous as you think.
The underlying principles of modern conservatism have not changed in the way labour has (not for the better I might add). A vote for labour is not a vote for Blair, the same way as a vote for the libs is not a vote for Jeremy Thorpe. In my view the conservatives are the only party who cannot afford to change due to their vested interest in the financial status quo. The other parties can and will change.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:03, Reply)
you mean a government
like Labour that has financially fucked the economy needs to change? Damn right they do. Modern conservatism has changed. It cares about people more than Labour does. Individual people, not some mealy-mouthed socialism that Gordon Brown has wet dreams about and will never implement.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:06, Reply)
Bankers fucked the country. Not Brown.
And you know it.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:09, Reply)
LoL.
Just wait. The tories never reveal their true colours until they are in power. Then all bets are off and it's open trough time. The tories only care about individual people of the right type. The rest are tax fodder. To my mind labour are currently shite because they have forgotten their roots and what they are supposed to stand for.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:10, Reply)
Wow
You genuinely don't think the last few years have happened do you? Labour are shit, they've fucked the entire country up. What they've done is worse than Thatcher in most respects. Even setting the economy aside (which is not solely the bankers fault) let's look at their trackrecord in education, health, and most of all foreign policy. Iraq anyone?
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:13, Reply)
Well I'm looking.
Education - what I see locally are six school all with new buildings and fully staffed. And only one of them lost their playing fields in the last Tory rule luckily.
NHS - two massive shiny new hospitals for me to choose from.
Iraq - oh, wait, that was American foreign policy. Which we were tied into to pay back Maggie's Falklands fun. America has a rather rightist capitalist government if I recall.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:22, Reply)
NHS spending has risen by 100% since 1997

Do you think that there has been a 100% increase in quality? this is a classic example of throwing money at a problem. Money borrowed by Labour that we will be paying back for the rest of our lives.

Labour have been shit even when they have borrowed more money than most people can egven imagine. What would have happened had they lived within their means? It doesn't bear thinking about.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:27, Reply)
Here you go
This is what *I* see
Education - Massive amounts of money wasted on shiny new schools, falling standards of literacy, abdication of teacher power
NHS - Don't even bother telling me a shiny new hospital is worth it. I've spent six months in a hell-hole being absused and mistreated by overworked nurses. Or how about the millions spent on a non-working IT system, or the increase in administration, or the new PFIs?
Iraq - Oh wait Tony Blair couldn't lick George Bush's arse enough. He was Labour. Yeeeeah that was payback for the Falklands. No it was a weak man playing a bad hand badly
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:30, Reply)
I worked in two of those school - still work in one. They are both very succesfull.
That's what I see.
I had to use one of the new hospitals. Very efficient, and while there was a lot of 'management' about, and I did feel a bit like product, the job was done.
That's what I saw.
Iraq - we shouldn't be there. Blair got out as soon as he realised he was not going to come up smelling of roses. But I'm glad you agree it was American policy. Brown would never have got us in.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:40, Reply)
I've had a very wide education
I've been to every type of school, and both my parents are teachers, and I can safely say that standards have dropped massively. Being a teacher is like being a social worker at the moment.
As for the hospitals on the surface they look good (sometimes) but I'm not merely basing my judgement on my own bad experience, but on other people I know who come out with what are pretty much horror stories. As NakedApe pointed out, it's simply not improved to the extent it should have with it's budget.
Iraq is just a fuck-up plain and simple, but it's Labour's fault for getting in there in the first place.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:45, Reply)
Foreigner
Hi. Sorry to but in - especially as I'm a foreigner and thus don't have a vote in the UK.

From my (limited) knowledge of the Falklands War, why would Iraq be pay-back for the Americans when it was Britain -v- Argentina, without American involvement?
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:42, Reply)
Curious Incident sort of thing.

(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:45, Reply)
You really think that the Conservatives care about the common man?
They have absolutley no idea about real life. How can they know what's best for us.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:13, Reply)
How can they not have an idea about real life?
Or rather any less so than any other politician. Take a look at Nick Clegg's background why don't you?

I think they've got a better handle on what is needed than Labour does
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:14, Reply)
you can say the same for most politicians
believe it or not, conservatives are people as well, and are much the same sort of people as the other parties, with a sprinkling more toffs.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:15, Reply)
to be honest
the Lib Dems have more toffs than the Conservatives in my university society
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:19, Reply)
university societies can fuck off
the tosser who runs the Lib Dem society at Exeter Uni is on the Labour propaganda saying that as Lib Dems won't get in he's voting Labour to stop the Tories.

outrageous behaviour from anyone, let alone someone "involved" at university level.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:23, Reply)
That's the cuntiest thing I've heard all week
students are generally pricks and I say that in the full knowledge that I am one myself
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:26, Reply)
I couldn't believe it when I read it

(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:34, Reply)

www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/04/21/conservative-general-election-candidate-rates-average-family-home-at-1million-115875-22200124/
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:20, Reply)
that guy is obviously an idiot
also, I didn't say they could relate to the man on the street, just that they weren't really any different from any other politician
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:23, Reply)
I know but it made me laugh.

(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:42, Reply)
That is a very stupid thing to say
However if you live in London, then million pound house are not that unusual, and the family living there may have been there for years riding the property boom. It doesn't mean they are exponetially richer then anyone else.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:24, Reply)
well
(a) notice the word 'claiming'
(b) the lack of actual statistics
(c) the lack of comparisons
(d) it's The Mirror
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:24, Reply)
All true: we agree on one more thing!
Pity about all the rest.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:29, Reply)
I don't care about the common man.
Filthy commoners. Ugh.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:32, Reply)
I'm not rich enough to not care about the common man
yet
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:34, Reply)
Thatcher
screwed the Prols, not the country.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:00, Reply)
Not quite.
So while the rest of the world was propping up their ailing heavy industry base and infrastructure against the day things would improve (and they have), Thatcher dismantled ours thoroughly and effectively. Way to go.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:05, Reply)
I can't disagree with that
But nobody in the Eighties, either in this country or any others could tell what was going to happen in the future. Unlike other European countries at the time, we went for a purely financial economy. Yeah, that screwed most people at the time who didn't have or couldn't afford the education necessary to get into the financial sector and as a humanitarian decision, it was a shit one.

However, her aim was to fix the economy the quickest way she could. Which she did. The Unions, whilst a good idea in general, had grown too powerful and paralised the country by mobolising the workforce every single time something happened that they didn't like. Thatcher did what she thought she needed to do to get rid of them. Once they were gone, the economy started to recover.

I think the whole thing could have been avoided if power-hungry Union bosses hadn't subverted the unions to feed their own agendas, but that's the problem inherent in Socialism, people are naturally out for themselves.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:11, Reply)
My father in law would agree with you on this one.
Which, considering he worked down the mines during the 1980's is perhaps a bit strange. He thought the sun shone out of Thatcher's arse. Staunch Tory through and through (but by his own admission is unconvinced by Cameron).
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:42, Reply)
Just goes to show
That you can't judge a voter by his party. I think Thatcher made some terrible decisions with awful implications for society on a humanist level, but saying that she wrecked the country isn't fair. Certainly you can't expect somebody like Thatcher to be too worried about the people when she's pursuing her goals.

She didn't wreck the country, but I think it's fair to say that when she fixed the country, she shafted society.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:56, Reply)
This phrase annoys me soo much, voting on performance from 28 years ago is retarded
Labour didn't exactly have a great time in the 70's but I don't automatically rule them out because of this. i rule them out as they are a bunch of incompetent cunts now.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:00, Reply)
Hmm - I see we have a few differences.
But we agree about Blair. He has moved on to lusher pastures and getting fat on it. History will probably record Blair as a continuation of Tory government and note the start of socialist work from Brown taking over.
(, Wed 21 Apr 2010, 13:01, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1