Prejudice
"Are you prejudiced?" asks StapMyVitals. Have you been a victim of prejudice? Are you a columnist for a popular daily newspaper? Don't bang on about how you never judge people on first impressions - no-one will believe you.
( , Thu 1 Apr 2010, 12:53)
"Are you prejudiced?" asks StapMyVitals. Have you been a victim of prejudice? Are you a columnist for a popular daily newspaper? Don't bang on about how you never judge people on first impressions - no-one will believe you.
( , Thu 1 Apr 2010, 12:53)
« Go Back
people who wear jeans
BELOW their asscheeks are tools.
i was walking behind one such specimen on the way to the tube today, he was waddling like a duck because his jeans were buttoned underneath his bum. do i really want to see his ass and underwear? no. but man he thought he was teh shit.
all i could think was, where is the village toolbox? i have found a tool that has escaped and needs to be locked back up. i wouldn't give him a job, a pound or even the time of day if he can't even pull his trousers up by himself!
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:33, 25 replies)
BELOW their asscheeks are tools.
i was walking behind one such specimen on the way to the tube today, he was waddling like a duck because his jeans were buttoned underneath his bum. do i really want to see his ass and underwear? no. but man he thought he was teh shit.
all i could think was, where is the village toolbox? i have found a tool that has escaped and needs to be locked back up. i wouldn't give him a job, a pound or even the time of day if he can't even pull his trousers up by himself!
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:33, 25 replies)
My housemate's in a band
and both the other two in the band wear their jeans like this
Maybe I'm getting old, but I think they look like complete idiots
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:38, closed)
and both the other two in the band wear their jeans like this
Maybe I'm getting old, but I think they look like complete idiots
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:38, closed)
Quite agree
Although this 'look' is apparently down to hand-me-down clothes in some of the poorer parts of the States. So I'm informed, the more ill-fitting your over-sized denims were, the bigger your older brother must be, thus meaning you don't get your head kicked in on regular basis.
Kids these days though, do, as you rightly point out, look like tools.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:39, closed)
Although this 'look' is apparently down to hand-me-down clothes in some of the poorer parts of the States. So I'm informed, the more ill-fitting your over-sized denims were, the bigger your older brother must be, thus meaning you don't get your head kicked in on regular basis.
Kids these days though, do, as you rightly point out, look like tools.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:39, closed)
More thoughts on the subject
www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/does-a-pair-of-trainers-hanging-from-a-telephone-wire-denote-poverty
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:45, closed)
www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/does-a-pair-of-trainers-hanging-from-a-telephone-wire-denote-poverty
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:45, closed)
Apparantly the theory is that you get your belt taken away from you when you get sent to jail and therefore have no way to hold your trousers up. If you wear your trousers halfway down your arse, it means that you have done time and must be a rude bwoy, innit?
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:46, closed)
I've been told it comes from US prisons.
Wearing low riders indicates your bum is available for hire.
In much the same way lipstick was originally a sign that the wearer was offering oral sex.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:47, closed)
Wearing low riders indicates your bum is available for hire.
In much the same way lipstick was originally a sign that the wearer was offering oral sex.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:47, closed)
Whether or not that theory is true
I think it should be pointed out to all those who do wander round with their jeans round their knees. I think they'd pull them up pretty sharpish...
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:15, closed)
I think it should be pointed out to all those who do wander round with their jeans round their knees. I think they'd pull them up pretty sharpish...
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:15, closed)
I heard this theory from my 60+ year old aunt...
It sounds plausible, but so do all of the other theories.
The conclusion to take from all this, is that peopl who wear their trousers so low, are probably poor, and probably gay.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:32, closed)
It sounds plausible, but so do all of the other theories.
The conclusion to take from all this, is that peopl who wear their trousers so low, are probably poor, and probably gay.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:32, closed)
Indeed.
In fact, any gentleman not in a bespoke three-piece Saville Row suit and wearing a trilby is not worth taking seriously.
As for women - subtley, understatement and humility is the true face of God, and baring oneself like a strumpet only cheap and irrefutably hostile to upstanding values.
As for children below working age - seen and not heard.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:39, closed)
In fact, any gentleman not in a bespoke three-piece Saville Row suit and wearing a trilby is not worth taking seriously.
As for women - subtley, understatement and humility is the true face of God, and baring oneself like a strumpet only cheap and irrefutably hostile to upstanding values.
As for children below working age - seen and not heard.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:39, closed)
if he wears a trilby
with a three piece Saville suit, he deserves a battering
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:52, closed)
with a three piece Saville suit, he deserves a battering
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:52, closed)
It's not racism
when I decline to sleep with your mum. It's specisim.
/has sunk low
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:55, closed)
when I decline to sleep with your mum. It's specisim.
/has sunk low
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:55, closed)
You're just jealous because I've got a mum
Not an adoption certificate.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:01, closed)
Not an adoption certificate.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:01, closed)
"In fact, any gentleman not in a bespoke three-piece Saville Row suit and wearing a trilby is not worth taking seriously."
But not if he's wearing the hat whilst indoors, surely.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:46, closed)
Well of course not.
That would be ridiculous, not to mention sartorially inelegant, rude, and disrespectful.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:54, closed)
That would be ridiculous, not to mention sartorially inelegant, rude, and disrespectful.
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:54, closed)
Didn't this all start. with Kris Kross?
They're all the followers of a shitty tweeny 90's rap group. On May 7 every year they burn all of their well fitting trousers around an effigy of Kris on the Kross
Daddy mack'll make ya, JUMP JUMP!!
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:52, closed)
They're all the followers of a shitty tweeny 90's rap group. On May 7 every year they burn all of their well fitting trousers around an effigy of Kris on the Kross
Daddy mack'll make ya, JUMP JUMP!!
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 11:52, closed)
They pissed out of their arses
And shat out of their cocks. People think that it was just a fashion thing but these kids were really sick
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:21, closed)
And shat out of their cocks. People think that it was just a fashion thing but these kids were really sick
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 12:21, closed)
« Go Back