b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Sexism » Post 603196 | Search
This is a question Sexism

Freddie Woo tells us: Despite being a well rounded modern man I think women are best off getting married and having a few kids else they'll be absolutely miserable come middle age.

What views do you have that are probably sexist that you believe are true?

(, Sun 27 Dec 2009, 12:23)
Pages: Latest, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

it's not cleaner!
just a myth circulated by God squad types who want to discourage masturbation.

The main function of the foreskin is to clean + protect the glans.

Poor sods with the end of their widgey chopped off. :[

Don't know what I'd do without my frenulum either
(, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 5:11, 5 replies)
Exactly.
And I doubt much would grow under there that wouldn't grow in a mimsy anyhoo.
(, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 5:29, closed)
Agreed
Chopping off your foreskin to prevent willy rot seems a bit like cutting off your lips to stop gum disease.
(, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 9:04, closed)
I dunno
Mine is neat and clean without it. and it doesn't look like its trying to hid something...
(, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 11:07, closed)
supposedly it's left over from when the jews were journeying through the deserts
sand in the foreskin is not good, so they removed it
(, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 15:07, closed)
This.
It's the fundamental reason Muslims do it too.
(, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 20:40, closed)
It CAN be cleaner
If a man has trouble with his foreskin, like it doesn't go all the way back. The man essentially can't clean under it, leaving a stinky vile mess that circumcision prevents.
(, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 15:53, closed)
That's for medical purposes then rather than just for the sake of cleanliness
Besides we have a foreskin for a reason. It has evolved to make sex more pleasurable (so to encourage you to procreate more often).
(, Sun 3 Jan 2010, 16:53, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, ... 1