oh give it a fucking rest you prick
the only soldiers I support are the ones that disobeyed orders when they realised how fucked up the tour was and how little regard it gave to the indiginous population, who , by the way, have very little choice about being there. And there are many who disobey. the true heroes in my opinion.After seeing the fisrt 10 mins of maimed and dismembered little afghani children, who were heroin addicts because of all the trauma they experience on a daily basis would change the publics attitude,but these reports are rare,compared to the charity drives for the poor bastards injured.then disposed of by the gov who were responsible for the shit in the first place.

"The pioneers of a warless world are the [youth] who refuse military service." Einstein

the opposite is also the case. Time to stop hero worshipping these bastards.
(Dagwood, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 18:39, 2 replies)

back to the sixth form, you whiney little shit.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 19:06, closed)

Back to Daily Mail corner
he has a perfectly valid point. The only reason the troops are kept there is so the governent don't lose face, nothing more.
( sandettie light vessel automatic New Twitter - @bollocksreally, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 20:28, closed)

I don't read the Daily Mail, and I don't give a tupenny fuck about your approval or lack thereof. If a person's understanding of global politics is basically 'lol solders r teh bad rofl", I feel they can be safely ignored.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:18, closed)

So blaming the troops is a valid point?

( wotofco pissing in your swimming pool, Tue 28 Dec 2010, 11:53, closed)

I think blaming the troops
that know an action will lead to the death of innocents is very valid.
I think hero worshipping only the soldiers that refused to fight when they knew exactly how little consideration was given to these innocents is also very valid.
(Dagwood, Wed 29 Dec 2010, 22:00, closed)

ha ha
i've been earning a wage long before your mum wiped up that cum stain and shoved it up her mif to produce you, you shitstained little fuck
(Dagwood, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:15, closed)

cutting.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:19, closed)

aw diddums
i would love to shove all the whiney little armchair cunts like you in afghanistan and see how pro soldier/war you fucking are after you come back
(Dagwood, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:20, closed)

yeah, that would certainly show me.

I note you've ninja-edited both of your posts. Does your sweaty-fisted sweary frustration prevent you from forming a whole thought in one go?
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:28, closed)

aw diddums
people are going to disagree with your pro war bullshit as you cheer from your armchair. get used to it you little cunt
(Dagwood, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:32, closed)

which 'pro war bullshit'?

Honestly, I think differences of opinion are often helpful, and discourse should, in most cases, be encouraged. Yours, however, seldom (if ever) rises above the level of crude simplification, pathetic over-generalisation, and risible playground swears; you're not exactly "Question Time" material, are you?
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:38, closed)

says the fuckwit
who begins the disscusion by instead of challenging the logic of my post to instead opt for just calling me a whiney sixth former. get used to people calling you a pathetic little cunt. Im sure it isn't the first time. Muppet
(Dagwood, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:41, closed)

there really wasn't any, besides a poorly worded sub-Donovan rant along the lines of 'oh boo hoo soldiers are all irredeemably evil and it's all their personal fault and also they eat babies honest'.

Actually, I think by comparing your understanding to that of the average sixth-former, I was doing the latter a disservice.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:45, closed)

ah so I was meant
to deduct this arguement from that 1 line insult . Prat.

in your desperation to backtrack from your first insult you're now trying to convince me you had a valid objection to my post. yet you can't even fake being a smartarse very well.

If im sixth formish, as you say, going by the argumenent you've put up so far you must be fucking infant school.

go back and read the post you were replying to. When did I ever fucking say all soldiers were evil you utter tosspot.

forcing assumptions and even not reading my post correctly just makes you look a fucking prat my friend. kind of takes the shine off that self righteousness when you can't even understand the intial post you're replying to you soft shit.

my point was valid. alot of soldiers refused to fight, these are the ones that should be hero worshipped in my opinion. That was clear from the first post . you're either blind or just a thick twat. I did't say they are evil, but I do say every soldier takes responsibility for his actions, no one forces you to drop a bomb or pull a trigger when you know civilians are in danger. Given the absolute obscene fucking waste of innocent life in Afghansitan the piss poor excuse that they are just doing the right thing and following orders doesn't fucking wash in my opinion. alot of them there are aware of how wrong it is but do it because of the public support.

if we truely cared for the lives of these people putting on the uniform and more importantly for the thousands of innocents who have no choice in Iraq and Afghanistan then we have to show them our digust for their own good.

No doubt a fair percentage actually disagree with the war , but they think because of the huge public support they have an obligation to be there.

By showing our lack of support they would question their own motives more and without the support behind them may even rebel.
Even seeing how the MOD treats returning maimed soldiers is not enough to wake them up.

go on then genius, blind me with the logic of your counter arguement, or rather do what you've been doing : misread the post and invent something you say I've said and respond to that. Muppet
(Dagwood, Mon 27 Dec 2010, 23:02, closed)

Danny, you really are taking the bait far too easily.
Chill out a bit.
(pissflaps. FSPW, Tue 28 Dec 2010, 9:00, closed)

He is a cunt isn't he?

( Blackdogmanguitar is out with Fat Larry's Jazz Band on, Tue 28 Dec 2010, 12:34, closed)

well if he is, he's my type of cunt
what a post full of sense Mr Fireman :D
( cakeburglar still bored with Freebase, Tue 28 Dec 2010, 13:15, closed)

you have good taste
I like you and your convictions, don't let the little gobshites get you down fella
(Dagwood, Wed 29 Dec 2010, 21:51, closed)

oh the individual gobshites don't bother me
but the fact that as a society there are so many so easily led into supporting the actions of those that we would condemn if a different coloured flag was being waved about does tend to depress me somewhat :(
( cakeburglar still bored with Freebase, Thu 30 Dec 2010, 5:55, closed)

still sore are we?
better a cunt that a gobshite :)
do fuck off, there's a good chap
(Dagwood, Wed 29 Dec 2010, 21:43, closed)

Don't let me get to you :)

( Blackdogmanguitar is out with Fat Larry's Jazz Band on, Thu 30 Dec 2010, 10:34, closed)

aw didums
did the big bad man upset you?
(Dagwood, Thu 30 Dec 2010, 11:15, closed)

it's not bait if
I enjoy it, is it?
(Dagwood, Wed 29 Dec 2010, 21:58, closed)

Anybody care to summarise that?
far too much to read.

I suspect 'fuck off, you cunting muppet' just about covers it.
( Not Pineapple anymore, Wed 29 Dec 2010, 10:36, closed)

this really is grade A bollocks

( kappynitty doubled your entendre on, Wed 29 Dec 2010, 14:04, closed)

you are Rory Lyon
AICMFP

Actually, Rory Lyon's less stylish alter ego
( sandettie light vessel automatic New Twitter - @bollocksreally, Tue 28 Dec 2010, 1:43, closed)

Beautiful!
Edit: Hello SLVA, what are you doing down here by yourself?
( Ring Of Fire A petty, drooling belming butthurt retard., Tue 28 Dec 2010, 9:59, closed)

couldn't sleep
And civ.4 crashed on me
( sandettie light vessel automatic New Twitter - @bollocksreally, Tue 28 Dec 2010, 12:59, closed)

Yeah
it's totally the soldier's fault that they're fighting a pointless war. I'd hold them responsible for the Taliban using children as human shields, too. The stupid underfunded, underequipped and clearly undervalued cunts.
( wotofco pissing in your swimming pool, Tue 28 Dec 2010, 11:51, closed)

It's the propensity for the coalition forces to lob area effecting weapons (bombs and missiles) into places that clearly are likely to contain civilians that kill the civilians.

A Taliban hiding in a school does not make a school a legitimate or legal target. The troops in another generation may have rounded up the population of a village and executed them, we just drop a thousand pound bomb on it and claim the deaths were accidental.
( Ring Of Fire A petty, drooling belming butthurt retard., Tue 28 Dec 2010, 12:47, closed)

Fair enough
just thought I'd make the point that the Taliban are a bunch of spastic shitcunts. We've been dropping ordnance on civilians for a few generations now, not sure it's a particularly new development...as for this Danny the fireman chap, he's been quite happy to quote from people who treated the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as gospel, so I'm entirely unsure why he's quoting from a Jew now. Some consistency of standpoint, no matter how deluded, might be useful. Doubt it'll be forthcoming.
( wotofco pissing in your swimming pool, Tue 28 Dec 2010, 13:20, closed)

Protocols of the Elders of Zion was one of the very first things I read on the information superhighway.

( Ring Of Fire A petty, drooling belming butthurt retard., Tue 28 Dec 2010, 14:28, closed)

It pretty much set the precedent for 99% of the stuff on the internet
badly written unattributable conspiracy theory {{Citation needed}}.
( wotofco pissing in your swimming pool, Tue 28 Dec 2010, 15:13, closed)

what in the name of jesus titty christ
is 'the protocols of zion'? probably best i find out considering i'm being accused of quoting them/it eh?
just out of interst what have I said to make you thing Im quoting this zion bullshit?
(Dagwood, Wed 29 Dec 2010, 21:46, closed)