b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 1245757

Help!
Who were the two gay footballers in the NOTW yesterday?



Who wants to send me a get well soon card?
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:18, archived)
your mum and dad

(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:18, archived)
oh yeah...
that explains dads love of tights and cock
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:19, archived)
He
is the sidekick Robin from Batman?
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:22, archived)
Woohoo!
Go you!

also, I have no idea.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:20, archived)
Campbell and wise?

(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:20, archived)
i was thinking...
campbell and lampard. they both look like they enjoy le cock
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:20, archived)
I had heard it was Campbell
and thats why he went AWOL for a little while. I havent seen the NOTW *spits* though.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:21, archived)
well he is always in bed with morecombe

(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:23, archived)
sol campbell and graeme le saux
/vague popbitch memory
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:20, archived)
I actually meant le saux but couldn't remember his name so I guessed at wise

(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:22, archived)
hahaha
have a woo
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:22, archived)
but really
popbitch is over there
*points*
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:23, archived)
You are new to talk so I will let you know woos are for the other board
*keeps woo*
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:24, archived)

can i give out wo instead, or just w?
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:26, archived)
no
learn the rules or die
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:26, archived)

Doesn't surprise me

Edit: bugger. Copy and paste: http://www.geocities.co.jp/Athlete-Athene/7813/soccer/lesaux2.jpg
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:23, archived)
what the sweet shuddering baby jebus
has that to do ith Graham le socks?

Edit - ah, thank you. yep, he's seen the business end of a few blue-veined custard chuckers and no mistake.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:25, archived)
still doesn't work
*spangs*
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:25, archived)
Reload the fecking thing then, spangface

(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:26, archived)
Look you fucking
Cock guzzling kiddie touching slut, it doesn't work even with a reload
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:31, archived)
Well it obviously works for other people.
Are you sure you're not just terminally stupid?
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:37, archived)
he needs a handbag shopped into that

(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:26, archived)
What the fuck is THAT link all about?
It's aload of Carzy Jap(TM) writing and a flash banner of Crazy Jap(TM) schoolchildren.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:26, archived)
It's 'no hotlinking' in Forrin, presumably
hence the edit.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:27, archived)
hmm
i had a look on their website, but it's shit
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:22, archived)
Not unlike the paper then?

(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:24, archived)
i assume so
i don't read any of the rags as they're all shit
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:25, archived)

any of the rags as their all shit as my spelling will testify
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:27, archived)
bah
didn't edit in time, anyway it's a messageboard - like you care

itz nt lke i use txt spk lolz1!!
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:28, archived)
You'll find we do care
We care because you care.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:30, archived)
um
it was the right spelling!
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:31, archived)
It wasn't originally.
their they're
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:38, archived)
well thats ok then.
.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:43, archived)
I avoid the shit ones
but find myself drawn to The Independent and The Times, simply because they don't tend to insult my intelligence. The Times can, on occasion, show its Murdoch fangs, but on the whole it's pretty good.

The others blow goats.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:28, archived)
I still peruse the red tops and the mail from time to time
as I don't like to be a "I don't read them because they're shit" kind of guy. I like to know what and why things are shit before saying they're shit.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:31, archived)

i just get my news from other sources that happen to be more convenient and don't try to tell you what to think, or which political party is better etc
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:34, archived)
this (but less so the Times)
plus the Guardian and the Observer pour moi
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:32, archived)
eurgh, you dirty lefty
*showers you in lentils*
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:36, archived)
i have facist tendancies though

(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:45, archived)
*covers you in lentils*
*cooks you in a BNP-approved something oh never mind I can't be arsed to finish this
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:53, archived)
Bah!
The Grauniad and, to a lesser extent, The Observer throw opinions at you, reporting stories in a biased way (which, in my opinion, is almost as bad as The Sun & Mirror controlling the thinking of their readership by their method of reporting).

That they use bigger words and are biased in a different direction is neither here nor there to me. :(
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:37, archived)
*shrugs*
I don't really care. As long as they kiss and hug each other, that's all I need to get me off.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:23, archived)
Apparently "they cannot be named due to legal reasons"
i.e. they're making it all up.

Anyway, who cares? I'm sure there are plenty of gay footballers, to be honest out of that many men it would be pretty weird if there wasn't. Why should it be headline news?
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:25, archived)
Cos we dun want some fackin pooves playing a real mans sport
/average notw reader
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:26, archived)
Exactly
It is common knowledge that the welsh and french rugby teams are a big bunch of gays but no-one makes a big deal out of it.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:27, archived)
Google Image Search for 'french rugby team' with SafeSearch off
But don't do it at work.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:30, archived)
with the Welshers
at least their forwards, it's not so much the gayness as the family lineage. You know, dad was a Valley boy and a miner, mum was a Leicester Longwool.
(, Mon 13 Feb 2006, 11:31, archived)